It seems you are right indeed. Compatibility has to be taken into
consideration, using OpenDMARC library version that is accessible from
headers, I guess a mere of an if statement should handle two code
blocks for post to 1.3.2 and up to 1.3.2, in relation to this specific
" few
On 2022-01-09 Zakaria via Exim-users wrote:
>> On 9 Jan 2022, at 11:44, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users
>> wrote:
>> On 08/01/2022 18:30, Edwin Balani via Exim-users wrote:
>>> Can't you rely on OPENDMARC_LIB_VERSION? It's defined in dmarc.h:
>> Quite possibly. Now, is the changed API
Also, the EXIM reference of opendmarc_policy_store_dkim its in
https://github.com/Exim/exim/blob/e3e281ccf9d8777d0df98ddd644720573e0343d1/src/src/dmarc.c
“
libdm_status = opendmarc_policy_store_dkim(dmarc_pctx, US sig->domain,
dkim_result, US"");
"
While following new OpenDMARC method
I spent an amount of time trying to get latest DMARC work against master EXIM,
over last few weeks. It was only one method DMARC has refactored, with extra
parameter, and EXIM integration isn’t it taking into account.
I found this bug issue opened on
On 08/01/2022 18:30, Edwin Balani via Exim-users wrote:
Can't you rely on OPENDMARC_LIB_VERSION? It's defined in dmarc.h:
Quite possibly. Now, is the changed API documented? Or are we
supposed to inspect the libdmarc code and watch for API-breaking
changes, evermore? And *guess* from the
On 8 Jan 2022, at 14:07, Julian Bradfield via Exim-users
wrote:
> My mail servers run, and have run for decades, on Debian, and I've
> always used the Debian package for exim4, though I don't use debconf
> for my own additions, but just edit the conf.template file as if it
> were a .conf file.
>
Hi Julian,
Julian Bradfield via Exim-users (Sa 08 Jan 2022 15:07:01
CET):
> My mail servers run, and have run for decades, on Debian, and I've
> always used the Debian package for exim4, though I don't use debconf
> for my own additions, but just edit the conf.template file as if it
> were a
On 2022-01-08, Odhiambo Washington via Exim-users wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 8, 2022 at 5:26 PM Julian Bradfield via Exim-users <
> exim-users@exim.org> wrote:
>
>> My mail servers run, and have run for decades, on Debian, and I've
>> always used the Debian package for exim4, though I don't use debconf
On 2022-01-08, Slavko (tblt) via Exim-users wrote:
>>So I suppose the question is: if I drop the master-source-built binary
>>on top of the Debian one, what can I expect to break?
> AFAIK spfquery is used in debian's exim for years, thus i am confused, why it
> is problem for you right now,
Hello.
On Sat, Jan 08, 2022 at 03:27:45PM +, Julian Bradfield via Exim-users wrote:
> Specifically, I don't like the idea of installing an external tool
> spfquery and using the slightly clunky config snippet to use it,
> rather than using the built-in spf - I like things in the exim4
On Sat, Jan 08, 2022 at 05:02:10PM +, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users wrote:
The dmarc library project appears to have changed their API
in a incompatible fashion. It's difficult to tell, because
there is no visible documentation and no obvious way to discover
the library version at build
* Julian Bradfield via Exim-users (exim-users@exim.org) [220108 16:36]:
> However, I also don't like fiddling with systems more than necessary -
> sysadmin is not my job, it's just what I have to do to make things
> work. If I have to go the trouble of building my own Debian package, I
> might as
On Sat, 8 Jan 2022, Julian Bradfield via Exim-users wrote:
On 2022-01-08, Andreas Barth via Exim-users wrote:
* Julian Bradfield via Exim-users (exim-users@exim.org) [220108 15:18]:
The pain of dealing with Debian's antiquated versions (4.92) and
gratuitous messing around with upstream's
On 08/01/2022 16:31, Slavko (tblt) via Exim-users wrote:
new version of DMARC lib, which fails
to build with exim
The dmarc library project appears to have changed their API
in a incompatible fashion. It's difficult to tell, because
there is no visible documentation and no obvious way to
Hi Julian,
I installed exim from source, and here is my input.
Expect to start with all configuration being set in one file when you
install from source. I used Dovecot as IMAP server, for security
purposes disabled startttls in port 587 for smtp in exim and 143 +
startttls for
Dňa 8. januára 2022 15:27:45 UTC používateľ Julian Bradfield via Exim-users
napísal:
>So I suppose the question is: if I drop the master-source-built binary
>on top of the Debian one, what can I expect to break?
IMO nothing will break, except two things:
+ many ACL & routers presets, which
On 08/01/2022 15:27, Julian Bradfield via Exim-users wrote:
(Tainting is the
main thing I'm aware of as a risk.)
It's also a major benefit, because it shows up places in your
config where you have coded in a manner vulnerable to attack.
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## List details at
On 08/01/2022 15:27, Julian Bradfield via Exim-users wrote:
I like things in the exim4 manual
to work in my installation!
The manuals for old releases are available on the Exim website.
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim
On 2022-01-08, Andreas Barth via Exim-users wrote:
> * Julian Bradfield via Exim-users (exim-users@exim.org) [220108 15:18]:
>> The pain of dealing with Debian's antiquated versions (4.92) and
>> gratuitous messing around with upstream's configuration (most recent
>> annoyance, not supporting
On Sat, Jan 8, 2022 at 5:26 PM Julian Bradfield via Exim-users <
exim-users@exim.org> wrote:
> My mail servers run, and have run for decades, on Debian, and I've
> always used the Debian package for exim4, though I don't use debconf
> for my own additions, but just edit the conf.template file as
On 08/01/2022 14:07, Julian Bradfield via Exim-users wrote:
I wonder if anybody on this list has done such a conversion recently,
and would have time to share the chief gotchas they encountered.
Not directly, but: ALWAYS read the ChangeNotes file when changing
versions. It's there for good
* Julian Bradfield via Exim-users (exim-users@exim.org) [220108 15:18]:
> The pain of dealing with Debian's antiquated versions (4.92) and
> gratuitous messing around with upstream's configuration (most recent
> annoyance, not supporting built-in SPF) is prompting me to think about
> switching to
My mail servers run, and have run for decades, on Debian, and I've
always used the Debian package for exim4, though I don't use debconf
for my own additions, but just edit the conf.template file as if it
were a .conf file.
The pain of dealing with Debian's antiquated versions (4.92) and
23 matches
Mail list logo
