On Friday 23 of November 2012, Graeme Fowler wrote:
On Fri, 2012-11-23 at 13:32 +0100, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote:
Shouldn't exim_tidydb make databases physically smaller?
You'd like to think so, wouldn't you? However for reasons which are
historical but mostly related to performance, Exim
Hi.
Shouldn't exim_tidydb make databases physically smaller?
# ls -al /var/spool/exim/db/callout
-rw-r- 1 exim exim 677601280 11-23 13:25 /var/spool/exim/db/callout
# exim_tidydb -t 2d /var/spool/exim/ callout /dev/null
# ls -al /var/spool/exim/db/callout
-rw-r- 1 exim exim 677601280
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz ar...@maven.pl wrote:
Hi.
Shouldn't exim_tidydb make databases physically smaller?
Have a look at
http://www.exim.org/exim-html-current/doc/html/spec_html/ch52.html#SECID262
--
.warren
--
## List details at
W dniu 23.11.2012 13:32, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz pisze:
Hi.
Shouldn't exim_tidydb make databases physically smaller?
# ls -al /var/spool/exim/db/callout
-rw-r- 1 exim exim 677601280 11-23 13:25 /var/spool/exim/db/callout
# exim_tidydb -t 2d /var/spool/exim/ callout /dev/null
# ls -al
On Friday 23 of November 2012, Warren Baker wrote:
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz ar...@maven.pl
wrote:
Hi.
Shouldn't exim_tidydb make databases physically smaller?
Have a look at
http://www.exim.org/exim-html-current/doc/html/spec_html/ch52.html#SECID26
2
On Fri, 2012-11-23 at 13:32 +0100, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote:
Shouldn't exim_tidydb make databases physically smaller?
You'd like to think so, wouldn't you? However for reasons which are
historical but mostly related to performance, Exim prefers to use the
Berkeley DB library for its databases.
