Re: [exim] :fail: in a manualroute router?

Dave Lugo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm converting a sendmail install to exim. > Mailertable on sendmail has numerous entries such as this: > yhoo.comerror:5.7.1:550 Check address - maybe yahoo.com > I'd like to duplicate that in an exim router - but it seems that > :fail: doesn't wor

Re: [exim] :fail: in a manualroute router?

Dave Lugo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 30 Sep 2007, Andreas Metzler wrote: >> > Mailertable on sendmail has numerous entries such as this: >> > yhoo.comerror:5.7.1:550 Check address - maybe yahoo.com >> > I'd like to duplicate that in an e

Re: [exim] Debian packages for Exim

Luca Bertoncello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I want to install Exim on a Debian server. > Unfortunately, Debian uses a (relatively!) old version of Exim, an I can't > use some features... [...] I will probably upload 4.68-2 for etch to backports.org, once it has not propagated to testing. Tempora

Re: [exim] Debian packages for Exim

Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I will probably upload 4.68-2 for etch to backports.org, once it has > not propagated to testing. Temporary packages on ^^^ Delete the "not" to get a useful sentence. ;-) -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailm

Re: [exim] Exim OOMing on 800K spam messages

Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've recently started having a problem with exim causing the machine > it's running on to OOM on some emails - of around 800K. I know this > machine can normally accept messages of up to around 8MB or so > usually without problems. [...] It probably is no

Re: [exim] Rejected EHLO

Oscar Mas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Oscar Mas wrote: >> I use exim4 with split configuration. When a user send a mail to my >> server he say: >> 2007-11-23 17:22:41 rejected EHLO from [217.116.29.3]: syntactically >> invalid argument(s): domain_domain.net >> The problem is the "_", [...] >

Re: [exim] Debian exim and Ubuntu exim - differences?

Pascal Penners <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > in a few days, I need to migrate all services on our old Ubuntu 6.10 server > to a new machine, which I want to use with Debian stable. The main purpose > of the machine is serving as a mail server using exim 4.63. > Now I need to know if there are diffe

Re: [exim] exim3 vs exim4 configs

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >I have used exim3 for quite awhile and got comfortable with the > configure syntax > however I am looking for a cross reference table that would make the > transitions from 3x to 4x > less of a headache. > The main thing I am interested in is requiring no users can se

Re: [exim] exim3 vs exim4 configs

jake_stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>As you can see this is a spammers dream, I must be missing something, >>Why is this a spammers dream? It does not allow unauthenticated hosts >>to send mail to arbitrary addresses, only to local ones. >I see this as a problem because anyone from an

Re: [exim] Wildcard aliases do not work

Tony Finch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 26 Mar 2008, Konstantin Boyandin wrote: [...] >> The catch-all alias >> *: localbox >> doesn't work, either. > You need to tweak the system_aliases router to use lsearch* instead of > plain lsearch. > http://www.exim.org/exim-html-current/doc/html

Re: [exim] Different smarthosts on different ports?

Steinar Bang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Platform: Ubuntu 7.10, Intel Pentium M, > exim4 4.67-5build1 > I'm currently relaying outgoing email via my home machine, connected via > a cable modem, on a non-standard port, because my ISP blocks incoming > SMTP. > I've done this, by adding a

Re: [exim] EXIM4 ERRORS ON UBUNTU SERVER

Kosmocronos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't receive incoming fax (hylafax 4.4.0 + Ubuntu server 7.10) on my email > address : > when I try to run the command exim -bt faxmaster I receive this errors (I > think) : > R: lowuid_aliases for [EMAIL PROTECTED] (UID 105) > R: system_aliases for [

Re: [exim] incompatible command-line options or arguments

Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 06 May 2008 17:07:32 +0200, Brent Clark > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>Hopefully Marc too will port 4.69-3 to testing very soon. > http://www.debian.org/releases/testing/ > Thankfully it doesn't take manual intervention to have packages > migrate fr

Re: [exim] malformed numerical string / system filter

Anja Gawlik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > ** This is my system.filter: > if $h_X-Spam-Score above 7.5 [...] > ** And this ist the error-message I find in mainlog: > 2008-06-09 15:20:29 1K5hI4-0002gB-CS Error in system filter: malformed > numerical string "-2.5" > (The mail is not being del

Re: [exim] Denying all remote deliveries

Doug Jolley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have an instance of exim setup for the exclusive purpose of > receiving and delivering incoming e-mail to local mailboxes. It does > not handle any outgoing e-mail. I would like to configure this > instance of Exim to deny all deliveries (including the d

Re: [exim] Exim can't delete queue

shwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ubuntu 8.04 > Exim 4 > I have 10 frozen messages in the queue and I can't delete them. Both of > these commands: > sudo exim -bpr | grep frozen | awk '{print $3}' | xargs exim -Mrm [...] > return Permission Denied. [...] You are running 'sudo exim -bpr' and pi

Re: [exim] Failed to get write lock for /var/spool/exim4/db/retry.lockfile: timed out

On 2006-04-26 Philip Hazel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 25 Apr 2006, Andreas Metzler wrote: [...] > > Perhaps this is related to mailscanner? > Ah! I don't know much about mailscanner. Am I right in thinking it looks > at Exim's spool files itself?

Re: [exim] Bug#360696: Bug#360696: Failed to get write lock for /var/spool/exim4/db/retry.lockfile:timedout

On 2006-04-26 Michel Meyers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Philip Hazel wrote: >> On Tue, 25 Apr 2006, Michel Meyers wrote: >>> If there's anything I could run to debug it, please let me know (as I >>> can reproduce the problem pretty easily here). >> Perhaps compiling Exim with -g and taking a cor

Re: [exim] Abused as spam relay with A=login:0 ??

Heiko Schlittermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] ># login authentication using a clear text password file >login: > driver = plaintext > public_name = LOGIN > server_prompts = Username:: : Password:: > server_condition = ${if > eq{$2}{${lookup{$1}lsearch{/etc/exim4/

Re: [exim] Bug#360696: Failed to get write lock for /var/spool/exim4/db/retry.lockfile:timedout

On 2006-04-28 Michel Meyers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Philip Hazel wrote: [...] >> (gdb) where >> #0 0xe410 in ?? () >> #1 0xbfd18ce8 in ?? () >> #2 0xb7ab6ff4 in ?? () >> #3 0xbfd18d0c in ?? () >> #4 0xb7a44313 in ?? () >> #5 0xb7e78cb0 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libdb-4.2.so >> #6 0xbfd

Re: [exim] URI Blacklists in Exim

Stanislaw Halik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > Slightly offtopic: it's bad that no alternative to SA (preferably > written in C) exists, it seems not to do much more than DNSBL checks, > MIME decoding, HTML parsing and regexp matching. Even with that, on a > pretty minimalistic setup, the daemo

Re: [exim] URI Blacklists in Exim

Stanislaw Halik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Apr 29, 2006, Andreas Metzler wrote: >>> Slightly offtopic: it's bad that no alternative to SA (preferably >>> written in C) exists, it seems not to do much more than DNSBL checks, >>> MIME decoding, HT

Re: [exim] A proper way to authenticate users against login?names/passwords

Timo Neuvonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > So, I'm checking user names against regular user login names and passwords, > not from a separate database. [...] > I'm using Exim 4.60. > How are you others doing this? I am not using system passwords, I want to use CRAM-MD5, which cannot work wit

Re: [exim] exim 4.61 + spamassassin 3.1.1 spamd not writing headers

Rob Lingelbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Spamd from spamassassin 3.1.1 doesn't write headers for exim to > parse. Spamd debug shows it > processes messages on port 783 and scores them. Running > "spamassassin -t spam.out" > writes headers fine. Where might I be going wrong? thanks in ad

Re: [exim] suppress pipe close at "\n.\n"?

Marilyn Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm making an application that pipes to exim for a redelivery. > And, today I have an email message that breaks my code because exim > closes the pipe when it sees "\n.\n". [...] > Is there some way to suppress the pipe closing at a dot? Quote from the

Re: [exim] problem with the declaration (delay_after_cutoff = false)

enediel gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At the end of the file /etc/exim4/exim4.conf.template I added > delay_after_cutoff = false > but restarting the exim I got > Restarting MTA: 2006-05-18 09:57:52 Exim configuration error in line 667 of > /var/lib/exim4/config.autogenerated.tmp: > opt

Re: [exim] Advice needed on Bounce messages and backup MX

Per Dalgas Jakobsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > Setup: > Two servers on seperate domains acting as primary MX as well as backup > MX for each other. (Friends server and my server). > Problem: > My server is rejecting mails detected as spam (sa-exim). When spam is > delivered through backu

Re: [exim] Comments in config files

Marc Perkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there any other commenting character in config files other than the # > character? Looking to comment blocks like: > /* > text > */ > Something like that? I guess this .ifdef blah .endif should work. cu andreas -- ## List details at http://www

Re: [exim] at what point does exim generate a message ID?

Ian P. Christian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At what point does exim generate a ID for a mail? [...] http://www.exim.org/exim-html-4.62/doc/html/spec_html/ch11.html#SECTexpvar $message_exim_id When a message is being received or delivered, this variable contains the unique message id that is ge

Re: [exim] Exim4 + greylistd + spf

Aurélien Fernandes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A few months ago I installed Ex Exim 4.5-8 + Clamav + Greylist on > my Debian Sarge. When i started to get spams coming through the greylist > I decided to install SPF as first filter. SPF is no Anti-Spam measure. It is just a way to enforce that e

Re: [exim] STARTTLS fails

Daniel Tiefnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Marc Sherman wrote: >> On debian, iif gnutls-bin is installed, it changes the way it >> regenerates the encryption params to do a way that does not cause >> Exim to block. > Could you be a little bit more verbose on this? What exactly is changed? > I a

Re: [exim] Greylisting without SQL db

Andreas Pettersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does anyone know of a good greylister for use within Exim ACL that > doesn't make use of an SQL db? postgrey and greylistd. > Or require python for that matter. That kicks out greylistd. ;-) > I'm thinking of implementing greylisting, but I don't

Re: [exim] Postfix Xforward in exim?? OS fingeprinting in exim?

Marc Sherman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Is there implementation of postfix Xforward in exim? >> I want to use exim with p0f fingerprinting and amavisd-new but i cannot >> because of lack Xforward mechanism. > What does Xforward do? http://www.postfix.org/XFORWARD_RE

Re: [exim] "pipe_transport unset" error... (exim4-sarge / sympa)

Francois Sauterey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, it's a well knowned problem about "pipe_transport unset in..." error, > but I can't find a pertinent answer ;~{ > I use the exim4 debian sarge package, in a splited configuration style, > and I'm trying to configure it with the sympa mailling

Re: [exim] Submission mode, Message-ID header

Martijn Grendelman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > One example of blocked mail came from a large internet provider in The > Netherlands (@Home) that, according to the Received headers, uses Exim > 4.30. This particular mail came from one of their clients and did not > have a Message-ID header

Re: [exim] dbm/dbmnz 'write' lookup?

Jim Tittsler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is it possible to have Exim write to a dbm/dbmnz as part of a string > expansion or are only reads possible? Only reads are possible, you'd need to use a helper binary or sidestep the issue by using sqlite instead. cu andreas -- The 'Galactic Cleaning'

Re: [exim] Exim and mailman

Phillip Ryker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > mailman_router: > driver = accept > #require_files = MAILMAN_HOME/lists/$local_part/config.pck > require_files = > /virtual/${domain}/mailman/lists/$(lc:$local_part)/config.pck [...] This looks like an error, it probably shold say /virtual/${

Re: [exim] SQL Lookup question

Stuart Gall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In the docs a mysql example is > ${lookup mysql{select mailbox from users where id='userx'}\ > {$value}fail} > I find ${lookup mysql{select mailbox from users where id='userx'}} > returns the data just fine. > What are the $value and fail for ? http://

Re: [exim] builtin greylisting?

Marten Lehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > there are several greylisting projects, but they all lack serious > documentation, require perl-scripts to be called and seem to be just > hacks to get the greylisting-thing done. What is the problem with greylistd (or postgrey)? > Is there anything p

Re: [exim] adding a header to a message in an ACL, ?even when the condition defers

Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I want to do this: > warn message = X-Exim-ACL-envelope-sender-verify: failed > ($acl_verify_message) > !verify = sender/callout=60s > ...and that's all good, *unless* it defers, in which case I get no header :( > Adding defer_ok makes the warn ve

Re: [exim] Sender: did I miss something ?

David Restall - System Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I noticed today that exim's messages came without a Sender: header > line. I have been using this to save the messages to a file. Is it a > deliberate thing or has something broken. I've now changed my pattern > to /return-path:ex

Re: [exim] condition check in router with a space in the header

Marco Kammerer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I want to ask in a router if the Spam Flag is set to YES > condition = ${if def:h_X-Spam-FLAG: YES {1}{0}} > http://www.exim.org/exim-html-3.30/doc/html/filter_33.html Consulting the documentation for 3.30 if you are using 4.63 is not necessarily a goo

[exim] Re: no immediate delivery

Zbigniew Szalbot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have been testing exim and saw this in log. Could someone help me > understand them? >> 2005-08-24 11:00:19 ILPYCJ-0002ZC-9Z no immediate delivery: more than 10 >> messages received in one connection > Does it mean that exim deferred the delivery b

[exim] Re: Mails stay in spool

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] > To empty the spool by "hand" i tried: " /usr/sbin/exim4 -qf -v" > but i got following error: > /usr/sbin/exim4: relocation error: /usr/sbin/exim4: undefined symbol: > db_create_4002 [...] What arch is this on? Are you running Debian stable? What does ldd /usr/sbin

[exim] Re: which linux for exim

Marc Sherman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > as a result, Debian will often ship as stable a relatively immature x.x0 > or x.x1 release. For example, the current Debian stable release > contains exim 4.50. While many of the fixes from 4.51 were backported > into Debian's 4.50 package before

[exim] Re: Debian exim

Marc Sherman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > So, to summarize, my suggestion remains: something else should be the > default MTA, targetting the people who just want mail to work, and don't > need a fully featured MTA. My previous suggestion was ssmtp, which you > pointed out correctly isn't ap

[exim] Re: rerouting emails with an unqualified local part

Christopher L. Everett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > cobalt:/etc/exim# exim -d2 -bt [EMAIL PROTECTED] [...] -bv instead of -bt or even better running a real test with -bd -d (on a different port -X 666 if you cannot take down the main daemon) might yield better results. cu and

[exim] Re: Stumped and Frustrated

Marc Perkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have a file with a list of domains: > paypal.com > ebay.com > ... > It's in a domain list: > domainlist verify_list = dbm;/etc/exim/run/verifylist.db > And on an ACL I have > sender_domains = +domain_verify > So - if the sender is [EMAIL PROTECTED] - I

[exim] Re: ClamAV with Exim4.50

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Saturday 01 October 2005 23:07, Marc Haber wrote: >> On Sat, 1 Oct 2005 17:47:04 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >The following error occured: >> >Reloading exim4 configuration files >> >2005-10-01 16:56:32 Exim configuration error in line 92 >> >of /var/lib/exim4/c

[exim] Re: Exim Config for ClamAV (av_Scanner) and SpamAssassin?(spamd_address)

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I have an server with Exim. I want to uses ClamAV and SpamAssassin to scan > incoming mail (presumably coming through port 25 SMTP) for all users. The > hostname is "server" and the domain is "windfinder.com". > So I guess the correct entries in /etc/exim4/exim4.conf.

[exim] Re: LDAP lookup over SSL

Philip Hazel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Are you sure that there is a specification for STARTTLS in LDAP? I > thought it was just an SMTP thing. STARTTLS is also used for IMAP and NNTP. cu andreas -- The 'Galactic Cleaning' policy undertaken by Emperor Zhark is a personal vision o

[exim] Re: Replacing subject header when spam scanning: new idea & FAQ suggestion

Tim Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > Now, the method suggested in the spec (using warn = Subject: whatever) > is OK, but results in two Subject headers which is a bit nasty. So I > started thinking about an improved way, and stumbled across FAQ Q0905 > (http://www.exim.org/exim-html-4.50/

[exim] Re: Routers senders option, multiple senders?

Burhan Khalid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am trying to apply a outgoing email redirect to a few addresses in > my domain. After browsing the archives for a while, I came upon this > router: > sneaky_copy: > driver = redirect > senders = [EMAIL PROTECTED] > data= [EMAIL PROTECTED] >

[exim] Re: FW: Undeliverable Mail

Robert Cates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've just recieved this mail, and do not know how this even happened. I'm > finally getting my Exim 4.54 server configured to work well and protected > (at leased I thought), but today I get mail like this one (also one where I > supposedly sent mail to [E

[exim] Re: Potential logic error in retry handling for IPv4+IPv6 hosts

Philip Hazel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > I have not looked at the source, but the patch should be trivial; just > delete (or skip) the code that processes the additional section. [...] I see. I think this should do the trick: --- --- exim-4.60/src/host.c.orig 2006-01-01 15:1

[exim] Re: Skip ACL action on specific mail address

Michael Ben-Nes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have the next ACL rule: > denymessage = This message scored $spam_score spam points. >spam= nobody:true >condition = ${if >{$spam_score_int}{45}{1}{0}} > I want to skip this rule if the address is [EMAIL

[exim] Re: mandate ehlo before mail while sending out email

Gilbert W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 1 of my client sent an email to hallmarklabels.com but he didn't succeed. > Here's what the log said: > 2006-01-05 17:49:32 1EuRhL-0005l7-SW ** <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>R=dnslookup > T=remote_smtp: SMTP error from remote mailer after RCPT TO:< > [EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

[exim] Re: Why doesn't this work?

Marc Perkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Trying to reject based on subject. This is in the predata acl > denymessage = REJECTED >condition = ${if match{$h_Subject:}{x}{true}{false}} > What am I missing? Hello, The predata ACL determines the response to DATA command, whether the clien

[exim] Re: Extract email address from From header

Marc Perkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OK - this can't be that hard but how do you extrace the email address > part from the $h_From: header? > Shouldn't this work? ${local_part:$h_From:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:$h_From:} > What am I missing? Thanks in advance. Works for me. ($address would be shorte

[exim] Re: Extract email address from From header

Marc Perkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > The first one works. It tests the sender. The second one tests the From > header and it soesn't seem to work. > # - Master Block List Sender > denymessage = REJECTED - Sender listed in master block list >condition = ${if exists{/etc/exim

[exim] Re: Exim 4.60 & SpamAssassin 3.1.0 Problems

Jeff Lasman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday 11 January 2006 08:39 am, Giuliano Gavazzi wrote: >> On 11 Jan 2006, at 15:18, Bradley Walker wrote: >> > domainlist local_domains = lsearch;/etc/virtual/domains >> > domainlist relay_domains = lsearch;/etc/virtual/domains : localhost >> mmm, r

[exim] Re: global filtering with exim4

Ivo Michiel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Strange, when I add the line: > system_filter = /etc/exim4/system_filter.exim > in the config file: /etc/exim4/exim4.conf.template > I get this result: > Exim configuration error in line 669 of [...] system_filter needs to go into the first section of the

[exim] Re: 3000 + frozen messages

Jeremiah Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there an easy way to "thaw" 3000 frozen messages? The exim -Mvh > method will take to long. How about exipick -i | xargs exim -Mt cu andreas -- The 'Galactic Cleaning' policy undertaken by Emperor Zhark is a personal vision of the

[exim] Re: 550 Administrative prohibition

Arnór Kristjánsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > -- > xa-speakers:~# telnet 127.0.0.1 25 > Trying 127.0.0.1... > Connected to 127.0.0.1. > Escape character is '^]'. > 220 xa-speakers.lhi.is ESMTP Exim 4.50 Sun, 05 Feb 2006 17:04:42 + > ehlo xa-speakers.org > 250-xa-speakers.lhi.is Hello xa

[exim] Re: message_size_limit

Jim Pazarena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I do not have this option set in my configure file, > and it was my understanding that unset meant unlimited. [...] > yes, it was huge, but I don't have this set? The docs indicate > default is zero (unlimited) but the above suggests otherwise. Am I > missi

[exim] Re: no reply to STARTTLS

Jürgen Herz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > Now I'm quite puzzled, but after some searches it looks like a common > problem. ldd says exim4 is linked against libgnutls.so.11 as well as > libssl.so.0.9.7. [...] That's because ldd lists indirect linking. e.g. for exim this can be caused by: exim

[exim] Re: Sending mail through a smarthost with TLS

Matthew Ford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would like to configure Exim to send all of my non-local outgoing mail > through an external relay on port 465. The relay host requires TLS and > SMTP authentication. I do not need to use TLS for incoming mail. > I am confused as to whether I need to s

[exim] Re: Gateway recipient verification (again)

Tor Willy Austerslått <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > userlist_domains: > driver = redirect > allow_fail > domains = DEBCONFdc_relay_domainsDEBCONF > data = [EMAIL PROTECTED]/etc/exim4/ > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:fail:Unknown user} You are missing a final closing curly brace, but I guess that

[exim] Re: greylisting builtin to exim?

Jeremy C. Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Has there been any discussion of patching exim to add greylisting support > (so outside programs are not needed)? > I understand that exim can insert mysql (or postgres) records. > But also needed would be a way for Exim to keep time and expire the > gr

[exim] Re: Help with "if" syntax

Martin A. Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have an ACL entry that pulls a value from a SQL database. If the > database is unavailable, I'd like the entry to default to a sensible figure. > So far I have this: > warn set acl_m6 = ${if eq{${lookup pgsql{ATTHRESH}}{0}{60}{${lookup > pgsql{AT

[exim] Re: How to substitute colon `:' for another character in?maildir_format delivery file name?

My BSD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > The problem is not really Samba but Windows. > The cron job is to backup Maildirs from an OS/X host to a smb share on > a Windows server mounted with "mount_smbfs." > Because, as far as I know, file names in Windows may not contain a > colon, the Windows

[exim] Re: command line macros

Sergei Gerasenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I need to define a macro only under certain conditions. That's why I > thought I'll just use the -D option when I start exim. But it seems like > if a macro with the same name doesn't exist in the configuration file, > the -D version of the same macro d

[exim] Re: MBX format and UW-IMAP

David Snowden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have been experimenting with implementing shared mailboxes using > MBX format, but I seem to have run into a tricky problem with file > locking and I was wondering if anyone else has seen this and can > advise on a fix. [...] > If I have read the documen

[exim] Re: local_scan_path error

De Leeuw Guy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I just upgrade exim 4.34 to 4.60, but when I start exim -bV I receive an > error : > Exim version 4.60 #1 built 01-Apr-2006 13:41:50 [...] > main option "local_scan_path" unknown > the sa-exim it's no longer supported ? I ommited an option ? Iirc local_

[exim] Re: trusted_users

Alexandre Busquets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's possible have the trusted_users stored in a file? [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat /tmp/trusted ametzler : staff : games [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ /usr/sbin/exim4 -bP | grep trusted_g trusted_groups = ametzler:staff:games [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ grep trusted_gr

[exim] Failed to get write lock for /var/spool/exim4/db/retry.lockfile: timed out

Hej, we have received the following bugreport in Debian BTS by Michel Meyers on : --- [...] Version: 4.60-4 [...] I communicate a lot with people defined on an SMTP server that uses greylisting and whenever that server rejects one of my outgoing e-mail

[exim] Re: spam_score_int signed or unsigned?

Jakob Hirsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Quoting W B Hacker: >> Steal threads *how* ?? I started a new one. > No, you replied to a message in an existing thread, otherwise there > would have been no References and In-Reply-To header. Which will cause it to appear as part of the treead in any de

[exim] 4.61 documentation not yet on website

Hello, the webpage still only contains the 4.60 docs. :~$ w3m -dump_head http://www.exim.org/exim-html-4.61/doc/html/spec.html/index.html HTTP/1.1 404 Not Found [...] thanks, cu andreas -- The 'Galactic Cleaning' policy undertaken by Emperor Zhark is a personal vision of the emperor's, and its

[exim] Re: 4.61 documentation not yet on website

Marc Sherman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andreas Metzler wrote: >> the webpage still only contains the 4.60 docs. >> :~$ w3m -dump_head >> http://www.exim.org/exim-html-4.61/doc/html/spec.html/index.html >> HTTP/1.1 404 Not Found >> [...] > Docs are on

Re: [exim] Failed to get write lock for /var/spool/exim4/db/retry.lockfile: timed out

On 2006-04-20 Philip Hazel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 15 Apr 2006, Andreas Metzler wrote: > > gets stuck with 100% CPU usage and the only way to get rid of it is to > > kill it with signal 9. While the stuck process is there, the mainlog > > keeps men

Re: [exim] Authentication using saslauthd <-> cyrus_sasl

Christian Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > what I've got here is not a real question, but more a problem in > understanding the authentication mechanisms. > I configured my exim (4.50 on Debian Sarge) to use salsauthd for > authentication. The authenticator looks like this: > sasl_plain: > d

Re: [exim] Authentication using saslauthd <-> cyrus_sasl

Christian Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andreas Metzler, 22.04.2006 (d.m.y): [...] > But what I didn't yet understand is what the differences between the > following two authenticators are: > saslauthd_plain: > driver = plaintext > public_name = PLAIN > s

Re: [exim] Why is this list so abusive?

Jason Meers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why is this list so abusive? [...] exim-users is probably the least abusive list or newsgroup I am subscribed to. Generally even no-brain questions are answered not with RTFM, but with solution is x, more detail in reference manual chapter y. cu andreas --

Re: [exim] Failed to get write lock for /var/spool/exim4/db/retry.lockfile: timed out

On 2006-04-25 Philip Hazel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 21 Apr 2006, Andreas Metzler wrote: [...] >>>> 2006-04-04 09:13:48 1FQfhL-00035E-Ay Failed to get write lock for >>>> /var/spool/exim4/db/retry.lockfile: timed out >>>> 2006-04-04 09:14

Re: [exim] Exim 4.63 Segmentation Fault when starting with -bd -q30m

Tom Kistner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tomasz Werczynski wrote: >> I didn't uncoment one line :-( >> deamon_smtp_ports = 25 > And that makes the crash go away? If yes, do you also use the > local_interfaces setting? >> I thought that is active on default. > The default is 'smtp' (which will u

Re: [exim] Newbie help for virtual domains (Exim4)

Roy Coates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > Many thanks Marc, I'll check that out. I'm a little concerned now that > the packaged debian edition of exim has been 'tweaked' such that the > standard solution to this problem doesn't work. [...] exim itself has not been tweaked at all. Just the def

Re: [exim] smtp authentification with exim

rezeaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > I have installed sasl2-bin but it still doesn't work. [...] Is it running? cu andreas -- The 'Galactic Cleaning' policy undertaken by Emperor Zhark is a personal vision of the emperor's, and its inclusion in this work does not constitute tacit approval

Re: [exim] include directive

Jonathan Knight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm trying to use the .include (in fact the .include_if_exists) > directive and I'm not being successful at getting the filename to > include a string expansion. [...] > So I'm guessing that string expansion isn't possible in an include > directive.

Re: [exim] update-exim4.conf.conf > dc_local_interfaces

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > An interface connected to an ISP commonly > has a dynamical address. How would this > be specified in update-exim4.conf.conf > > dc_local_interfaces ? Can an interface > be specified? > dc_local_interfaces='eth0' > Perhaps a domain name. > dc_local_interfaces='peasth

Re: [exim] Postfix policy server imitation

Mark Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have need to have Exim imitate the Postfix policy server protocol, [...] > The particular field I'm looking for input on is the "instance" > field. The documentation says: > instance=123.456.7 > The "instance" attribute value can be used to correlat

Re: [exim] localhost bypass ignore_target_hosts rule

Klauss Fumuldavijus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > my exim's configre under the "routes" section looks like the following: [...] > wondering, where else (matched "*") gets involved in the configuration? > so, as far as my machine's hostname is not present at upstream's dns - mails > get unroutable.

Re: [exim] exim and mailman - performance issues and obsolete variable?

Zbigniew Szalbot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I sent this to the list but did not get any reply. I hope you can suggest > something. [...] >> http://www.exim.org/howto/mailman.html for details. [...] >> I'd like to notify Mailman developers to update their FAQ. Follow the link you posted, it con

Re: [exim] Connection time out

AndrewODYN wrote: > I have exim4 installed on a debian box and it has been working ok for nearly > a year. However all of a sudden we are having problems sending emails - the > e-mails stay on the queue. > The emails we send all go to an external mail server. > When a do a mail -v t...@odyn.co.uk

Re: [exim] clamd: unable to connect to UNIX socket?/var/run/clamav/clamd.ctl (No such file or directory)

W B Hacker wrote: > Stephen Gran wrote: [...] >> The version of clamd he's running has some known bugs WRT signature >> processing - it takes ages to load the signature (sometimes more than 15 >> minutes on even good hardware), and it won't create the socket until it >> has loaded the signatures.

Re: [exim] Options for authenticating against /etc/shadow (PAM)withoutmaking exim suid root

On 2008-08-28 08:48, Jaco van der Schyff wrote: > What are my options to auth against /etc/shadow using PAM without giving > exim too much priviledges? > I currently have two options: chgrp exim /etc/shadow or write an > external authenticator (which is suid root) that returns a > true/false which

Re: [exim] Root user and aliases

Space Ship Traveller wrote: [...] > Because there is no domain supplied, the mysql query fails and exim > decided to try and route the address to the smarthost.. This doesn't > really seem correct - if the address is provided without a domain, > should it default to localhost? yes? no? No.

Re: [exim] TLS verification errors in 4.69?

Heiko Schlittermann wrote: [...] > on the client side I'm now using openssl s_client, on the server side > I tested: > openssl s_server -accept 587 \ >-CAfile /etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt >-cert /etc/ssl/certs/ssl.schlittermann.de.crt \ >-key /etc/ssl/private/ssl.schlittermann.d

Re: [exim] greylisting

David Woodhouse wrote: > On Sat, 2009-06-06 at 17:19 +0100, Terry wrote: [...] >> ( using postgrey by the way ) . > Ah, that explains it. Postgrey is one of the worst implementations of > greylisting I've ever encountered. Hello David, Could you please tell me what's so bad about postgrey? I am

Re: [exim] greylisting

Andreas Metzler wrote: > David Woodhouse wrote: [...] >> I'd suggest reading http://wiki.exim.org/SimpleGreylisting > [...] > Situation seems to have changed, though. Major thing I do not like about this: It runs after DATA. For me a major point of greylisting is to be c

Re: [exim] DKIM and DomainKeys

Rick Cooper wrote: [...] > BTW: the current exim-doc in cvs appears to be broken and won't build. It > appears to be broken in the section you added a couple of weeks ago > referencing the DKIM support. There are a bunch of errors all pretty much > like > ** Error: missing closing flag %& > Pro

  1   2   3   4   >