On Fri, 2003-02-21 at 11:25, James Sparenberg wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-02-21 at 06:58, Praedor Atrebates wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On Thursday 20 February 2003 08:07 pm, Vincent Danen wrote:
> > > On Thu Feb 20, 2003 at 10:58:03AM -0500, Praedor Atrebates wr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 21 February 2003 02:25 pm, James Sparenberg wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-02-21 at 06:58, Praedor Atrebates wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On Thursday 20 February 2003 08:07 pm, Vincent Danen wrote:
> > > On Thu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 21 February 2003 03:03 pm, Todd Lyons wrote:
> Praedor Atrebates wrote on Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 01:19:52PM -0500 :
> > > Try a RedHat kernel. I suspect you're having acpi issues.
> >
> > You appear to be correct but in a way I hadn't suspecte
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Praedor Atrebates wrote on Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 01:19:52PM -0500 :
>
> > Try a RedHat kernel. I suspect you're having acpi issues.
> You appear to be correct but in a way I hadn't suspected. I installed the
> current cooker kernel (binary) and then
> > In any case, the harddrive is new, the system memory is sound, the CPU is
> > sound, the video card is sound (NVidia Ti4200).
And what about the sound card? Any sound in there?
Sorry, i know, stupid joke, you will probably want to beat me up for
this, but i could not resist.
Want to
On Fri, 2003-02-21 at 06:58, Praedor Atrebates wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Thursday 20 February 2003 08:07 pm, Vincent Danen wrote:
> > On Thu Feb 20, 2003 at 10:58:03AM -0500, Praedor Atrebates wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > Have people actually managed to BUIL
Praedor:
Wich compiler are you using??
I use to have problems with it a long time ago.
Try to see wich are the options that the 2.4.19-24mdk.src.rpm package
use to generate the binary package.
El Vie 21 Feb 2003 11:58, Praedor Atrebates escribió:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 20 February 2003 02:45 pm, Todd Lyons wrote:
> Praedor Atrebates wrote on Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 10:58:03AM -0500 :
> > Anything kernel-wise from 2.4.19 or higher has been a complete, total
> > loser for me. It is either kernel panics (can't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 20 February 2003 08:07 pm, Vincent Danen wrote:
> On Thu Feb 20, 2003 at 10:58:03AM -0500, Praedor Atrebates wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > Have people actually managed to BUILD 2.4.19-24mdk and use it? Or are
> > you simply using the binary versi
On Thu Feb 20, 2003 at 10:58:03AM -0500, Praedor Atrebates wrote:
[...]
> Have people actually managed to BUILD 2.4.19-24mdk and use it? Or are you
> simply using the binary version. What did MandrakeSoft do to get it to build
> and actually work, if this is the case? To what god(s) did they
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 20 February 2003 04:14 pm, Robert Crawford wrote:
> Praedor's problems must be system related. Admittedly, I'm not running any
> peripherals that could cause problems.
>
> With a stock 9.0 install, kernels 2.4.19-16mdk, 2.4.-19-24mdk, kern
Hi,
Todd Lyons wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Praedor Atrebates wrote on Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 01:48:15PM -0500 :
whatsoever, no beeps, no messages. Logs are totally devoid of any
information on the 2.4.19-24 kernel. It is absolutely, totally, without
doubt a dead, lif
Praedor's problems must be system related. Admittedly, I'm not running any
peripherals that could cause problems.
With a stock 9.0 install, kernels 2.4.19-16mdk, 2.4.-19-24mdk, kernel.org
vanilla 2.4.20 (with or without a preemptive patch), and the cooker
2.4.21.-0.pre4.5mdk (normal i586, or r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Praedor Atrebates wrote on Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 01:48:15PM -0500 :
> whatsoever, no beeps, no messages. Logs are totally devoid of any
> information on the 2.4.19-24 kernel. It is absolutely, totally, without
> doubt a dead, lifeless, useless, lim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Praedor Atrebates wrote on Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 10:58:03AM -0500 :
>
> Anything kernel-wise from 2.4.19 or higher has been a complete, total loser
> for me. It is either kernel panics (can't find init even though there IS an
> init), no bootups, lo
On Thursday 20 February 2003 11:54 am, Greg Meyer wrote:
> On Thursday 20 February 2003 10:58 am, Praedor Atrebates wrote:
> > Have people actually managed to BUILD 2.4.19-24mdk and use it? Or are
> > you simply using the binary version. What did MandrakeSoft do to get it
> > to build and actuall
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 20 February 2003 11:54 am, Greg Meyer wrote:
> On Thursday 20 February 2003 10:58 am, Praedor Atrebates wrote:
> > Have people actually managed to BUILD 2.4.19-24mdk and use it? Or are
> > you simply using the binary version. What did Man
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 20 February 2003 10:58 am, Praedor Atrebates wrote:
>
> Have people actually managed to BUILD 2.4.19-24mdk and use it? Or are you
> simply using the binary version. What did MandrakeSoft do to get it to
> build and actually work, if this
Well, at the suggestion of someone on the list, I downloaded, built, and
installed the 9.0 update kernel 2.4.19-24mdk. Doesn't work. Not at all. I
also built 2.4.18 from MDK 8.2 (and have been using my own build of the
default MDK 9.0 kernel) and can use each without problems. 2.4.19-24mdk,
19 matches
Mail list logo
