Re: [expert] Did someone else get this also?????

2003-09-05 Thread Anne Wilson
On Friday 05 Sep 2003 1:05 am, Charlie wrote: IIRC also doesn't infect win98 and Millennium boxes. [or is there just no patch for these from M$ because they no longer support those O/S's?] As I understand it, it uses a 'feature' introduced into NT and present in all related versions :-)

Re: [expert] Did someone else get this also?????

2003-09-05 Thread Bryan Phinney
On Thursday 04 September 2003 07:58 pm, Charlie wrote: On Thu, 4 Sep 2003 11:00 pm, many eyes noted that Mark Belanger wrote: On Thu, 4 Sep 2003 20:36:42 +1000 Charlie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [expert] Re: Approved From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] See the

Re: [expert] Did someone else get this also?????

2003-09-05 Thread ed tharp
On Fri, 2003-09-05 at 07:34, Bryan Phinney wrote: On Thursday 04 September 2003 07:58 pm, Charlie wrote: On Thu, 4 Sep 2003 11:00 pm, many eyes noted that Mark Belanger wrote: On Thu, 4 Sep 2003 20:36:42 +1000 Charlie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [expert] Re: Approved From: [EMAIL

[expert] Did someone else get this also?????

2003-09-04 Thread Charlie
[expert] Re: Approved From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] See the attached file for details Inserted here was:- thank_you.pif Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com I suppose it was quite harmless but naturally it went in the bin.

Re: [expert] Did someone else get this also?????

2003-09-04 Thread Anne Wilson
On Thursday 04 Sep 2003 11:36 am, Charlie wrote: I suppose it was quite harmless but naturally it went in the bin. Yes - I got one for both the expert and the newbie list. I sent this to the newbie list when it was the first to arrive: Looking at the headers, I'm confused. I was looking for

Re: [expert] Did someone else get this also?????

2003-09-04 Thread Bryan Phinney
On Thursday 04 September 2003 06:43 am, Anne Wilson wrote: On Thursday 04 Sep 2003 11:36 am, Charlie wrote: I suppose it was quite harmless but naturally it went in the bin. Yes - I got one for both the expert and the newbie list. I sent this to the newbie list when it was the first to

Re: [expert] Did someone else get this also?????

2003-09-04 Thread Mark Belanger
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003 20:36:42 +1000 Charlie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [expert] Re: Approved From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] See the attached file for details Inserted here was:- thank_you.pif I suppose it was quite harmless but naturally it went in the bin. It is probably

Re: [expert] Did someone else get this also?????

2003-09-04 Thread stefmit
On Thursday 04 September 2003 06:28 am, Bryan Phinney wrote: On Thursday 04 September 2003 06:43 am, Anne Wilson wrote: On Thursday 04 Sep 2003 11:36 am, Charlie wrote: I suppose it was quite harmless but naturally it went in the bin. Yes - I got one for both the expert and the newbie

Re: [expert] Did someone else get this also?????

2003-09-04 Thread Bill
Man I was getting a ton of those from addresses I dont even know. It could be either W32.Elkern or the W32.Klez.E virus spreading again! I had to actually block the email server that was sending out these emails with my firewall. On Star Date Thursday 04 September 2003 06:00 am, Mark Belanger

Re: [expert] Did someone else get this also?????

2003-09-04 Thread Bryan Phinney
On Thursday 04 September 2003 08:55 am, stefmit wrote: Following the headers further down the chain, if they are to be believed would seem to indicate the origination was a pacbell DSL modem (67.122.222.126) which does belong to Pacbell so is probably accurate. If anyone on the list is

Re: [expert] Did someone else get this also?????

2003-09-04 Thread Eric Huff
Following the headers further down the chain, if they are to be believed would seem to indicate the origination was a pacbell DSL modem(67.122.222.126) which does belong to Pacbell so is probably accurate. If anyone on the list is using a pacbell DSL modem and has Windows machines

Re: [expert] Did someone else get this also?????

2003-09-04 Thread Anne Wilson
On Thursday 04 Sep 2003 2:00 pm, Mark Belanger wrote: On Thu, 4 Sep 2003 20:36:42 +1000 Charlie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [expert] Re: Approved From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] See the attached file for details Inserted here was:- thank_you.pif I suppose it was quite

Re: [expert] Did someone else get this also?????

2003-09-04 Thread James Sparenberg
On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 06:25, Bill wrote: Man I was getting a ton of those from addresses I dont even know. It could be either W32.Elkern or the W32.Klez.E virus spreading again! I had to actually block the email server that was sending out these emails with my firewall. On Star Date

Re: [expert] Did someone else get this also?????

2003-09-04 Thread Michael Adams
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003 08:17:52 -0700 Eric Huff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Following the headers further down the chain, if they are to be believed would seem to indicate the origination was a pacbell DSL modem(67.122.222.126) which does belong to Pacbell so is probably accurate. If anyone

Re: [expert] Did someone else get this also?????

2003-09-04 Thread Charlie
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003 11:00 pm, many eyes noted that Mark Belanger wrote: On Thu, 4 Sep 2003 20:36:42 +1000 Charlie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [expert] Re: Approved From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] See the attached file for details Inserted here was:- thank_you.pif I

Re: [expert] Did someone else get this also?????

2003-09-04 Thread Charlie
On Fri, 5 Sep 2003 04:50 am, many eyes noted that Anne Wilson wrote: On Thursday 04 Sep 2003 2:00 pm, Mark Belanger wrote: On Thu, 4 Sep 2003 20:36:42 +1000 Charlie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [expert] Re: Approved From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] See the attached