The current RHBeta is 6.9.5, and yes it is 2 CDs... but I don't think the
2nd is a "copy" of MDK7.02. There are still many apps that RedHat just
doesn't bother with, that Mandrake chooses to install whether you need them,
want them, or would rather never see. Pinstripe is still a smaller full
inst
Tell us more about it.
Jeff Malka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Registered Linux user 183185
- Original Message -
From: Greg Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 8:29 PM
Subject: Re: [expert] Differences between Red Hat and Man
pablito wrote:
[snip]
> problems. Mandrake also does a much better job sticking on the various
> programs that make Linux easier to use.
[snip]
Plz clarify this.
Thanks,
Ron
--
+--+
| Ron Johnson, Jr.Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I downloaded Pinstripe beta one night. It was two disks. The first one was
numbered Redhat 6.8 and would not install at all. The second disk was a copy
of Mandrake 7.02 ?!?!?!?
I don't have a lot of respect for redhat.
Abe
>= Original Message From "Greg Stewart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ===
Thank you.
Jeff Malka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Registered Linux user 183185
- Original Message -
From: Jesper Holmberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 1:51 PM
Subject: Re: [expert] Differences between Red Hat and Mandrake 7
> If Redhat is cake, Mandrake is cake and ice cream. Mandrake ROCKS!
>
You need to take a look at the RedHat 6.9.5 Pinstripe Beta. :-)
--Greg
__
Vous avez un site perso ?
2 millions de francs à gagner sur i(france)
that make Linux easier to use.
- Original Message -
From: "Jeff Malka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 10:15 AM
Subject: Re: [expert] Differences between Red Hat and Mandrake 7.1
: That is scary, particularly for a newb
ptember 08, 2000 7:53 AM
Subject: [expert] Differences between Red Hat and Mandrake 7.1
> There are numerous books in the stores about Red Hat and almost none about
> Mandrake. Even though Mandrake is derived from RH, I understand there are
> significant differences including where files are
Dont know man i find both with there ups & down
- Original Message -
From: "Ron Johnson, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 9:14 AM
Subject: Re: [expert] Differences between Red Hat and Mandrake 7.1
> &g
Having used RedHat for a couple of years, and having recently (about half a
year ago) switched to Mandrake, I don't think you can expect much
problems running RH RPM's on your machine, or finding RH-specific text
books invalid in the Mandrake environment. I haven't experienced any
problems.
The
you.
Jeff Malka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Registered Linux user 183185
- Original Message -
From: Denis Havlik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: liste.expert
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 11:47 AM
Subject: Re: [expert] Differences between Red Hat and M
On Sat, 09 Sep 2000, you wrote:
>
> > As far as "file locations" go, there is very little difference between LM
> > and RH. However, both RH and LM are going to change file positions a lot
^
> > in the future, in orde
> As far as "file locations" go, there is very little difference between LM
> and RH. However, both RH and LM are going to change file positions a lot
> in the future, in order to be Linux-Filesystem-Hierarchy compliant.
>
> Therefore, most of the the info about file-locations in these books will
On Fri, 8 Sep 2000, Jeff Malka wrote:
:~>Therefore my question is: what are the differences between RH and Mandrake
:~>that a user needs to be aware of to avoid causing problems. To include:
:~>
:~>file locations, config, etc.(I obviously do not know what else or I would
:~>not be asking the qu
There are numerous books in the stores about Red Hat and almost none about
Mandrake. Even though Mandrake is derived from RH, I understand there are
significant differences including where files are kept. As a newbie, this
strikes terror in that if I try to use a RH rpm, etc., I moght inadvertan
15 matches
Mail list logo
