This time Jim C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
becomes daring and writes:
>
> Arrgh! Half the people I know belong there! ;-)
Only half? :)
Vox
--
Think of the Linux community as a niche economy isolated by its beliefs. Kind
of like the Amish, except that our religion requires us to use _higher_
On Fri, 2003-03-07 at 14:07, Jim C wrote:
> Can one check one's self in after misusing "rm -rf"?
> ;-)
Well then heck none of us would be on the outside. PS about 4
months ago my 2 year old taught himself this command you know the
random monkey syndrome. Now I make sure I'm logged out
Can one check one's self in after misusing "rm -rf"?
;-)
Jim C wrote:
Arrgh! Half the people I know belong there! ;-)
Bill Mullen wrote:
On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 12:45, Vox wrote:
There is hope that we can now someday end the (mutual) suffering!
http://www.satirewire.com/features/siliconpines/acf.s
Arrgh! Half the people I know belong there! ;-)
Bill Mullen wrote:
On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 12:45, Vox wrote:
There is hope that we can now someday end the (mutual) suffering!
http://www.satirewire.com/features/siliconpines/acf.shtml
;)
(Bit of an old link, but I just tripped over it the other day
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
G'evenin' all...
On Thursday 06 March 2003 09:42 pm, Vox wrote:
James Sparenberg wrote:
> > Of course the obvious question would be who do you want to exclude and
> > how do you want the results of the test skewed... I can write a test to
> > exclude
This time James Sparenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
becomes daring and writes:
> On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 09:45, Vox wrote:
>> This time Jim C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> becomes daring and writes:
>>
>> >> IMNSHO, if you don't understand IP,TCP, UDP, you have no business
>> >> running a server of any
On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 09:45, Vox wrote:
> This time Jim C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> becomes daring and writes:
>
> >> IMNSHO, if you don't understand IP,TCP, UDP, you have no business
> >> running a server of any kind, no matter what Microsoft may have told
> >> you.
> >
> > Gee, thanks for the
On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 20:52, Bill Mullen wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 12:45, Vox wrote:
>
> > I don't advocate for a MSCE-like test for computer
> > users...theoretical tests don't mean a thing, IMNSHO...but let's
> > start giving out practical tests to everybody before allowing them
> >
This time Bill Mullen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
becomes daring and writes:
> On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 12:45, Vox wrote:
>
>> I don't advocate for a MSCE-like test for computer
>> users...theoretical tests don't mean a thing, IMNSHO...but let's
>> start giving out practical tests to everybody before
On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 12:45, Vox wrote:
> I don't advocate for a MSCE-like test for computer
> users...theoretical tests don't mean a thing, IMNSHO...but let's
> start giving out practical tests to everybody before allowing them
> to use a computer unsupervised...that'd be paradise :)
The
On Thursday 06 March 2003 10:58 am, Pierre Fortin wrote:
> Try a valid port (lsof -i :80) and note that you may not see ":80" but
> ":http"... this is not grep...
> HTH
Got it. I was using port 28000 'cause it popped into my head (Tribes 2 uses
it!). When I used a valid port, it worked fine. (f
On Thursday 06 March 2003 10:12 am, Jim C wrote:
> Did you try :
>
> which lsof
>
> You might not have the executeable.
Thanks for the reply. Yep, I do have it. I just wasn't using it on a port that
had anything. Port 28000 has nothing on it, so no report. Thats all. :-)
--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim C wrote on Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 05:37:35PM -0800 :
>
> Well perhaps you are correct but if you are and it is simple, then why
> am I not seeing netbios ports 137 and 138? If they weren't working I
> wouldn't be writing this because my Samba-LDA
This time Jim C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
becomes daring and writes:
>> IMNSHO, if you don't understand IP,TCP, UDP, you have no business
>> running a server of any kind, no matter what Microsoft may have told
>> you.
>
> Gee, thanks for the flame. :-/
It's not a flame, it's a statement of *m
On Thu, 6 Mar 2003 09:09:44 -0500 "Ronald J. Hall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Wednesday 05 March 2003 09:33 pm, James Sparenberg wrote:
>
> > lsof -i :port#
>
> Hmm, I just tried that and I must be doing something wrong. I tried:
>
> lsof -i :28000
> lsof -i :port28000
> lsof -i :port#2800
Did you try :
which lsof
You might not have the executeable.
Ronald J. Hall wrote:
On Wednesday 05 March 2003 09:33 pm, James Sparenberg wrote:
lsof -i :port#
Hmm, I just tried that and I must be doing something wrong. I tried:
lsof -i :28000
lsof -i :port28000
lsof -i :port#28000
lsof -i :
Apparently some do and some don't. I get such responses from this list
occasionally and if someone replies, getting something in my inbox
rather than having it sorted into one of my many list directories can be
helpful in finding it. I'm sorry you do not find it so. To my
knowledge, this is
On Wednesday 05 March 2003 09:33 pm, James Sparenberg wrote:
> lsof -i :port#
Hmm, I just tried that and I must be doing something wrong. I tried:
lsof -i :28000
lsof -i :port28000
lsof -i :port#28000
lsof -i :port 28000
lsof -i :port# 28000
So...which one is correct? I got various different re
On Wed, 05 Mar 2003 23:13:33 -0800 Jim C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jim,
Can you stop using reply to all? We use a list to keep the discussions
out of our regular mail...
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www
IMNSHO, if you don't understand IP,TCP, UDP, you have no business
running a server of any kind, no matter what Microsoft may have told
you.
Gee, thanks for the flame. :-/
Why not? We let people create human beings without training and there
is far more risk involved.;-)
Truth is that my
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# netstat -l | grep netbios
tcp0 0 *:netbios-ssn *:* LISTEN
^^^ ^^
udp0 0 208.152.4.20:netbios-ns *:*
udp0 0 enigma.micro:netbios-ns *:*
udp0
Because either you have samba running from xinetd or it isn't
running at all. Here's the output of netstat -ntupl on my box:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] etc]# service smb status
smbd (pid 17966) is running...
16535 (pid ) is running...
nmbd (pid 16545) is running...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] etc]# service xine
This time Pierre Fortin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
becomes daring and writes:
> On Wed, 05 Mar 2003 18:06:04 -0800 Jim C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> The truth is that I do not much care for netstat because I feel that it
>> is to much functionality crammed into one little command. I've always
>>
On Wed, 05 Mar 2003 18:06:04 -0800 Jim C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The truth is that I do not much care for netstat because I feel that it
> is to much functionality crammed into one little command. I've always
> felt that this is a poor way to manage complexity.
Even worse is trying to man
On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 15:34, Jim C wrote:
> I remember asking this question a couple of months ago but I can't
> remember the answer, or find the email, to save my life.
>
> What is a simple but sure way to find out if a specific port is open on
> a specific interface?
>
>
> Jim C.
>
>
lsof
The truth is that I do not much care for netstat because I feel that it
is to much functionality crammed into one little command. I've always
felt that this is a poor way to manage complexity.
Example of complexity cut from the much vaunted man pages:
SYNOPSIS
netstat [address_family_o
> I remember asking this question a couple of months ago but I can't
> remember the answer, or find the email, to save my life.
>
> What is a simple but sure way to find out if a specific port is open on
> a specific interface?
>
>
> Jim C.
Try nmap -p -65535 127.0.0.1 (or whatever IP number is
This time Jim C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
becomes daring and writes:
>
> Well perhaps you are correct but if you are and it is simple, then why
> am I not seeing netbios ports 137 and 138? If they weren't working I
> wouldn't be writing this because my Samba-LDAP PDC wouldn't be
> functional.
Be
OK, well perhaps my previous posting was a little kurt however, see my
postings in this thread about the missing ports which netstat is not
displaying.
Jim C.
Todd Lyons wrote:
Vox wrote on Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 06:45:03PM -0600 :
Did I mention simple?
uhm...nothing is simpler than:
netstat -
Well perhaps you are correct but if you are and it is simple, then why
am I not seeing netbios ports 137 and 138? If they weren't working I
wouldn't be writing this because my Samba-LDAP PDC wouldn't be functional.
Jim C.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# netstat -ntl
Active Internet connections (onl
This time Todd Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
becomes daring and writes:
> Vox wrote on Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 06:45:03PM -0600 :
>>
>> > Did I mention simple?
>>
>> uhm...nothing is simpler than:
>> netstat -ntpl
>> It'll give you a list of ports that are open in LISTEN or CONNECTED
>> state
Vox wrote on Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 06:45:03PM -0600 :
>
> > Did I mention simple?
>
> uhm...nothing is simpler than:
> netstat -ntpl
> It'll give you a list of ports that are open in LISTEN or CONNECTED
> state, and what program is keeping the port open...what simpler do
> you want?
I t
This time Jim C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
becomes daring and writes:
> Simon Prosser wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> netstat
>
> Did I mention simple?
uhm...nothing is simpler than:
netstat -ntpl
It'll give you a list of ports that are open in LISTEN or CONNECTED
state, and
Problem:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# netstat -ntl
Active Internet connections (only servers)
Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State
tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:32769 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:389 0.0
Simon Prosser wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
netstat
Did I mention simple?
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
I use netstat -ntl
JG
on the 05/03/03 23:46, Simon Prosser wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 05 Mar 2003 11:34 pm, Jim C wrote:
I remember asking this question a couple of months ago but I can't
remember the answer, or find the email, to save my life.
What is a sim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 05 Mar 2003 11:34 pm, Jim C wrote:
> I remember asking this question a couple of months ago but I can't
> remember the answer, or find the email, to save my life.
>
> What is a simple but sure way to find out if a specific port is open on
I remember asking this question a couple of months ago but I can't
remember the answer, or find the email, to save my life.
What is a simple but sure way to find out if a specific port is open on
a specific interface?
Jim C.
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://
38 matches
Mail list logo
