Eric Huff said:
>> > I'm only going to tell you one more time about hijacking threads,
>> > then I am going to get very, very, very angry.
>
>> what do you mean by saying that the author of this email 'hijacked'
>> the thread? PLEASE be aware, I'm not trying at all to get in any
>> conflict, I jus
> > I'm only going to tell you one more time about hijacking threads,
> > then I am going to get very, very, very angry.
> what do you mean by saying that the author of this email 'hijacked'
> the thread? PLEASE be aware, I'm not trying at all to get in any
> conflict, I just really don't know wh
On Saturday 20 Sep 2003 4:59 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> HaywireMac said:
> > On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 15:56:17 +0700
> > Fajar Priyanto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered:
> >
> > I'm only going to tell you one more time about hijacking threads,
> > then I am going to get very, very, very angry.
> >
> > *S
On Sat, 20 Sep 2003 08:59:43 -0700 (PDT)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
> but what do you mean by
> saying that the author of this email 'hijacked' the thread?
there's a whole thread about it above:
"hijacking: was Gopher was something else"
--
HaywireMac
Registered Linux user #282046
Homepage: w
HaywireMac said:
> On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 15:56:17 +0700
> Fajar Priyanto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered:
>
> I'm only going to tell you one more time about hijacking threads, then I
> am going to get very, very, very angry.
>
> *Stop it Fajar*.
HaywireMac,
I just wandered in here and started reading so
