On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 12:45:45 +0200, Udo Rader wrote:
Am Wed, 27 Aug 2003 01:10:59 + schrieb Matthew O. Persico:
On Sun, 24 Aug 2003 00:29:33 +0200, jipe wrote:
one easy way ...
GLOBIGNORE=no_not_this_one
then any glob like * will ignore this file
bye
jipe
YIKES! Why use estoeric, shell
Am Thu, 28 Aug 2003 03:01:18 + schrieb Matthew O. Persico:
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 12:45:45 +0200, Udo Rader wrote:
If you ALWAYS want to ignore the file. Can GLOBIGNORE take a regexp or a
list of patterns to ignore?
excerpt from the bash manpage:
--CUT--
GLOBIGNORE
On Sun, 24 Aug 2003 00:29:33 +0200, jipe wrote:
one easy way ...
GLOBIGNORE=no_not_this_one
then any glob like * will ignore this file
bye
jipe
YIKES! Why use estoeric, shell specific stuff when the proper application of STANDARD
(cross-shell) command will do:
cd TheDirectory
cp `ls -c1
On Sun, 24 Aug 2003 00:29:33 +0200, jipe wrote:
one easy way ...
GLOBIGNORE=no_not_this_one
then any glob like * will ignore this file
Ok, lets see if I can type a coherent sentence WITHOUT hitting the send key stroke
(apparently CTRL-E, which is end-of-line in xemacs..)
cd TheDir
cp `ls -c1
Am Wed, 27 Aug 2003 01:10:59 + schrieb Matthew O. Persico:
On Sun, 24 Aug 2003 00:29:33 +0200, jipe wrote:
one easy way ...
GLOBIGNORE=no_not_this_one
then any glob like * will ignore this file
bye
jipe
YIKES! Why use estoeric, shell specific stuff when the proper
application of
On Sat, 2003-08-23 at 10:32, Udo Rader wrote:
hi,
I have a directory that contains several hundred files and I want to
copy them all except _one_ file.
This sounds so easy yet still I am stuck or blind or stupid. Is there no
not operator in bash?
If it were, some construct like the
Use rsync.
Udo Rader wrote:
hi,
I have a directory that contains several hundred files and I want to
copy them all except _one_ file.
This sounds so easy yet still I am stuck or blind or stupid. Is there no
not operator in bash?
If it were, some construct like the thing below could then list
Am Sat, 23 Aug 2003 22:49:32 + schrieb Ron Stodden:
Use rsync.
*lol*, use it for rsync, use it for copy, use it for making coffee, use
it for everything ;-)
sounds like a bit of overhead to me :-)
udo
Udo Rader wrote:
hi,
I have a directory that contains several hundred files and I
On Sat, 23 Aug 2003 02:32:35 +0200
Udo Rader [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi,
I have a directory that contains several hundred files and I want to
copy them all except _one_ file.
This sounds so easy yet still I am stuck or blind or stupid. Is there no
not operator in bash?
If it were,
Udo Rader wrote:
Am Sat, 23 Aug 2003 22:49:32 + schrieb Ron Stodden:
Use rsync.
*lol*, use it for rsync, use it for copy, use it for making coffee, use
it for everything ;-)
sounds like a bit of overhead to me :-)
udo
No, in fact it is usually faster and less overhead than any
Am Sat, 23 Aug 2003 22:59:07 + schrieb John McQuillen:
On Sat, 2003-08-23 at 10:32, Udo Rader wrote:
If it were, some construct like the thing below could then list all
files in /opt/too_many_files except no_not_this_one:
% ls -l /opt/too_many_files/*{!no_not_this_one}
You were very
Am Sat, 23 Aug 2003 22:29:33 + schrieb jipe:
one easy way ...
GLOBIGNORE=no_not_this_one
then any glob like * will ignore this file
bye
jipe
wow, jipe!!
that is _exactly_ what I was looking for!!! thank you very much!
udo
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go
On Friday 22 August 2003 07:32 pm, Udo Rader wrote:
hi,
I have a directory that contains several hundred files and I want to
copy them all except _one_ file.
This sounds so easy yet still I am stuck or blind or stupid. Is there
no not operator in bash?
If it were, some construct like the
Udo Rader grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
If it were, some construct like the thing below could then list all files
in /opt/too_many_files except no_not_this_one:
% ls -l /opt/too_many_files/*{!no_not_this_one}
Yes, I know this doesn't work, but is there any other efficient way to do
this in
Am Samstag, 23. August 2003 04:21 schrieb David Guntner:
Udo Rader grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
If it were, some construct like the thing below could then list all
files in /opt/too_many_files except no_not_this_one:
% ls -l /opt/too_many_files/*{!no_not_this_one}
Yes, I know this
On Sat, 23 Aug 2003 02:32:35 +0200 Udo Rader [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi,
I have a directory that contains several hundred files and I want to
copy them all except _one_ file.
This sounds so easy yet still I am stuck or blind or stupid. Is there no
not operator in bash?
If it were,
May be for copy all but one:
mv not_this_one ~/tmp cp * /dist_folder mv ~/tmp/not_this_one .
[EMAIL PROTECTED] yankl]$ mkdir test
[EMAIL PROTECTED] yankl]$ cd test
[EMAIL PROTECTED] yankl]$ mkdir temp
[EMAIL PROTECTED] yankl]$ cd test
[EMAIL PROTECTED] test]$ vi 1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] test]$ vi 2
hi,
I have a directory that contains several hundred files and I want to
copy them all except _one_ file.
This sounds so easy yet still I am stuck or blind or stupid. Is there no
not operator in bash?
If it were, some construct like the thing below could then list all files
in
18 matches
Mail list logo
