Todd Lyons wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
daRcmaTTeR wrote on Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 06:08:29PM -0500 :
I'm not mad. I'm just trying to increase the SNR of this mailing list.
Ok...but whats SNR?
Maybe I should have written S/N Ratio instead. It's an acronym for
"Signa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
daRcmaTTeR wrote on Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 06:08:29PM -0500 :
>
> > I'm not mad. I'm just trying to increase the SNR of this mailing list.
> Ok...but whats SNR?
Maybe I should have written S/N Ratio instead. It's an acronym for
"Signal to Noise Rati
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Todd Lyons wrote:
> -pgpenvelope processed message
>
> Carroll Grigsby wrote on Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 09:39:08PM -0500 :
> >
> > With all due respect, putting this thread in the same category as that mess
> > last week is a hug
On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, et wrote:
>
> > I take responsibility for posting OT on the list. I would do it again but
> > perhaps in doing so I should have specified an off-list, direct reply to me
> > rather than in the list. Newsgroups are sometimes too slow and I needed
> > info ASAP (like within an
On Mon, 3 Feb 2003, Seth Zirin wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 09:59, Praedor Tempus Atrebates wrote:
> > I REALLY need some fast help with a simple statistics question but I am not
> > real strong on statistics. I have a question regarding Fisher's exact: is it
> > a legitimate test to run on a
On Tue, 2003-02-04 at 13:15, Todd Lyons wrote:
> Carroll Grigsby wrote on Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 09:39:08PM -0500 :
> >
> > With all due respect, putting this thread in the same category as that mess
> > last week is a huge leap. For one thing, this hardly a controversial topic.
>
> I did not sa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Carroll Grigsby wrote on Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 09:39:08PM -0500 :
>
> With all due respect, putting this thread in the same category as that mess
> last week is a huge leap. For one thing, this hardly a controversial topic.
I did not say it was the
> I take responsibility for posting OT on the list. I would do it again but
> perhaps in doing so I should have specified an off-list, direct reply to me
> rather than in the list. Newsgroups are sometimes too slow and I needed
> info ASAP (like within an hour or so).
I am on this list to learn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I take responsibility for posting OT on the list. I would do it again but
perhaps in doing so I should have specified an off-list, direct reply to me
rather than in the list. Newsgroups are sometimes too slow and I needed info
ASAP (like within an
On Monday 03 February 2003 04:06 pm, Todd Lyons wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Praedor Tempus Atrebates wrote on Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 03:51:40PM -0500
>
> > Thank you for the help...NOT. In any case, the "OT" DOES provide
> > warning that it isn't ON TOPIC and you can
I have a question regarding Fisher's
> > > exact: is it a legitimate test to run on a particular set of data I
> > > have.
> > >
No statistical test is legitimate in the hands of the inexperienced.
No statistical test is legimate in the hands of the experienced when they have
an agenda.
Mark Tw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Praedor Tempus Atrebates wrote on Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 03:51:40PM -0500
:
>
> Thank you for the help...NOT. In any case, the "OT" DOES provide
> warning that it isn't ON TOPIC and you can read at your own risk.
It's also a flag to list owners that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Seth will be pleased to know I did acquire an answer by aid from this list, no
less, which led me to a website which led me to a PERSON who was able to help
me out with my specific situation.
Thanks to those who did offer aid in various forms.
On M
On Mon, 3 Feb 2003, Praedor Tempus Atrebates wrote:
> I REALLY need some fast help with a simple statistics question but I am not
> real strong on statistics. I have a question regarding Fisher's exact: is it
> a legitimate test to run on a particular set of data I have.
>
> I need help fast.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thank you for the help...NOT. In any case, the "OT" DOES provide warning that
it isn't ON TOPIC and you can read at your own risk.
It sure beats the other OT thread on the list the other day. Be thankful.
On Monday 03 February 2003 03:44 pm, Set
On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 09:59, Praedor Tempus Atrebates wrote:
> I REALLY need some fast help with a simple statistics question but I am not
> real strong on statistics. I have a question regarding Fisher's exact: is it
> a legitimate test to run on a particular set of data I have.
>
> I need hel
On Monday 03 Feb 2003 H:59 pm, Praedor Tempus Atrebates wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I REALLY need some fast help with a simple statistics question but I am not
> real strong on statistics. I have a question regarding Fisher's exact: is
> it a legitimate test to run
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I REALLY need some fast help with a simple statistics question but I am not
real strong on statistics. I have a question regarding Fisher's exact: is it
a legitimate test to run on a particular set of data I have.
I need help fast. Anyone with kno
18 matches
Mail list logo
