Damian G wrote:
but my point is, probably you can't track it down to a single person, virtually
everyone who has you on their adress book can be sending them..
HTH
SHEESH!
Why in hell would I worry about a virus written for a windoze machine
running outlook? I don't do windoze. You do,
Craig,
This was the point I was trying to make that I did not articulate well
enough (I left too much for the reader to assume). You become the
recipient by simply being in someone's email address book (OL, OLE, ICQ,
etc...). The virus is simply being cute by setting the FROM header to
be the
J. Craig Woods wrote:
Damian G wrote:
but my point is, probably you can't track it down to a single person,
virtually
everyone who has you on their adress book can be sending them..
HTH
SHEESH!
Why in hell would I worry about a virus written for a windoze machine
running outlook?
On Mon, 22 Apr 2002 01:30:18 -0500
J. Craig Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Damian G wrote:
but my point is, probably you can't track it down to a single person, virtually
everyone who has you on their adress book can be sending them..
HTH
SHEESH!
Why in hell would I worry
Damian G wrote:
but my point is, probably you can't track it down to a single person, virtually
everyone who has you on their adress book can be sending them..
HTH
SHEESH!
Why in hell would I worry about a virus written for a windoze machine
running outlook? I don't do
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002 01:53:59 -0300 Damian G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Time for an interpreter... :^)
Damian G wrote:
but my point is, probably you can't track it down to a single
person, virtually everyone who has you on their adress book can be
sending them..
HTH
On Tue, 2002-04-23 at 00:42, Damian G wrote:
On Mon, 22 Apr 2002 01:30:18 -0500
J. Craig Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Damian G wrote:
but my point is, probably you can't track it down to a single person, virtually
everyone who has you on their adress book can be sending them..
On 23 Apr 2002 01:39:07 -0400
Lyvim Xaphir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2002-04-23 at 00:42, Damian G wrote:
On Mon, 22 Apr 2002 01:30:18 -0500
J. Craig Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Damian G wrote:
but my point is, probably you can't track it down to a single person,
Thus spake Damian G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On 23 Apr 2002 01:39:07 -0400
Lyvim Xaphir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2002-04-23 at 00:42, Damian G wrote:
On Mon, 22 Apr 2002 01:30:18 -0500
J. Craig Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Damian G wrote:
but my point is,
hmm. not to worry, it's not someone intentionally sending you a virus...
it's the latest Outlook/Outlook Express ... ummm undocumented feature. it's a new
virus that's been breaking out recently. i've alreeady got 10 different kinds of it..
it changes a lot, but it's always the same method.
It looks like someone has decided that I don't have enough headaches and
has started sending me viri. Normally this would not bother me, but the
problem is that the from line shows my email address on my website
[EMAIL PROTECTED]!
the email has been sent twice, from me, to me, containing
On Sat, 20 Apr 2002 21:00:29 -0500 Jason Guidry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
It looks like someone has decided that I don't have enough headaches and
has started sending me viri. Normally this would not bother me, but the
problem is that the from line shows my email address on my website
Pierre Fortin wrote:
The questions I have are:
- what is the qmail machine?
I have no idea. I've contacted roadrunner and ITMOM and I'm waiting for
replies.
- why did mail.itmom.com forward the msg to the qmail machine?
- why is the routing through hilconet.com when the destination is
13 matches
Mail list logo
