Hi Group:
I am progressing in the patch work. Can someone point me to the
location of the kernel on my system? The patch asked which file I
wanted to patch, and I assume that would be the kernel, but I cannot
find that on my 8.0 system. Thanks, again, Dennis in Victoria
Want to buy your
Remember:
There are no stupid questions; Only stupid people asking questions!
hah. kiddin.
Kernel is always at: /usr/src/linux
I always start with a fresh kernel from: kernel.org
It is a tar extrating to current dir linux dir.
cd /usr/src ; tar xzvf /tmp/kernel*gz
Ill
On Wed, 31 Oct 2001 09:23:19 -0500
dmyhand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Group:
I am progressing in the patch work. Can someone point me to the
location of the kernel on my system? The patch asked which file I
wanted to patch, and I assume that would be the kernel, but I cannot
find that
Thanks Alan and Michael:
I had always heard there are no stupid questions, but there are a LOT of
inquisitive idiots around. Peace, Dennis
Alan W Jurgensen wrote:
Remember:
There are no stupid questions; Only stupid people asking questions!
hah. kiddin.
Want to buy your
Marsden MacRae wrote:
I'm having a "duh" moment herehow do I tell which version of
Mandrake I've installed? Augh! Stop Laughing
M
check
/etc/mandrake-release
That should do it
I'm having a "duh" moment herehow do I tell which version of
Mandrake I've installed? Augh! Stop Laughing
M
cat /proc/version
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Marsden MacRae
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2001 12:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [expert] Stupid question
I'm having a "duh" moment herehow do I
On Thursday 22 February 2001 11:27 am, you wrote:
Marsden MacRae wrote:
I'm having a "duh" moment herehow do I tell which version of
Mandrake I've installed? Augh! Stop Laughing
M
check
/etc/mandrake-release
That should do it
Or uname -a
--
Ken Thompson
Electrocom
So sprach Larry Marshall am Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 04:55:50PM -0500:
If you don't have the kernel source you need to download the rpm and
install it.
But you won't need the full kernel source. The kernel headers rpm is good
enough.
Alexander Skwar
--
Homepage:
On Wednesday 01 November 2000 04:11, you wrote:
Argh. I feel dumb.
I just did a clean install of 7.2. I noticed that when I have tried to
compile something (for example, the latest Wine SRPM) that it has been
crashing with a file not found error.
I have narrowed the problem down to the
So sprach Gerald Williams am Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 03:07:32PM +0700:
Uh...another dumb question. You are root when trying to compile the SRPM?(G)
He shouldn't have to be, if that was what you were suggesting. About all of
the mandrake SRPMs are made so that a normal user can rebuild them.
So sprach Larry Marshall am Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 04:55:50PM -0500:
If you don't have the kernel source you need to download the rpm and
install it.
But you won't need the full kernel source. The kernel headers rpm is good
enough.
Interesting to know (I've never had need to compile
On Wed, 01 Nov 2000 04:29:12 Chris Spencer wrote:
On Tuesday 31 October 2000 19:57, you wrote:
Why do you need /usr/src/linux in the $PATH? Chances are the files that
Finding includes has nothing to do with PATH.
are missing are in some devel package. Do a web search for the missing
On Wednesday 01 November 2000 02:06, you wrote:
To the original poster:
Is there a sym link from /usr/include/linux to
/usr/src/linux/include/linux/ ? If not, add it, and you should be set.
Alexander Skwar
Yes, that symlink is there. Everything appears to be in order I just have no
idea
Check if you have /usr/include/linux symlinked to
/usr/src/linux/include/linux werewolf:~# ll /usr/include/linux
lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 26 Jun 8 02:09 /usr/include/linux
- ./src/linux/include/linux/
Same with /usr/include/asm. Or you can have both dirs "real" instead of
So sprach Sarang Lakare am Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 06:57:43PM -0500:
or something.. remember that the directory structure has changed a bit with
7.2.. now its FSH complient.
Well, yes, but the location of the kernel header files did not change.
To the original poster:
Is there a sym link from
Argh. I feel dumb.
I just did a clean install of 7.2. I noticed that when I have tried to
compile something (for example, the latest Wine SRPM) that it has been
crashing with a file not found error.
I have narrowed the problem down to the fact that /usr/src/linux is not in
the path, or include
I just did a clean install of 7.2. I noticed that when I have tried to
compile something (for example, the latest Wine SRPM) that it has been
crashing with a file not found error.
I have narrowed the problem down to the fact that /usr/src/linux is not in
the path, or include path, or
On Tuesday 31 October 2000 15:55, you wrote:
Do you have the kernel source code in a directory with a name similar to
/usr/src/linux-2.2.xx or do you have the source for the kernel stored
elsewhere? You need that directory tree (and its files) somewhere. Then
you need to make a link from
Chris Spencer wrote:
Argh. I feel dumb.
I just did a clean install of 7.2. I noticed that when I have tried to
compile something (for example, the latest Wine SRPM) that it has been
crashing with a file not found error.
I have narrowed the problem down to the fact that /usr/src/linux is
Why do you need /usr/src/linux in the $PATH? Chances are the files that
are missing are in some devel package. Do a web search for the missing
file and see what package it looks like it is in. You can always check
rpmfind.net for the most up to date package and build that *.src.rpm or
install
On Tuesday 31 October 2000 19:57, you wrote:
Why do you need /usr/src/linux in the $PATH? Chances are the files that
are missing are in some devel package. Do a web search for the missing
file and see what package it looks like it is in. You can always check
rpmfind.net for the most up
go into the makefile and add /usr/src/linux.. maybe its looking at /src/linux
or something.. remember that the directory structure has changed a bit with
7.2.. now its FSH complient.
-sarang
On Tuesday 31 October 2000 17:22, you wrote:
On Tuesday 31 October 2000 15:55, you wrote:
Do you
23 matches
Mail list logo
