On Sat, 2003-11-01 at 07:53, Anguo wrote:
> hello,
>
> When I try to install application, compile stuff and so on,
> I regularly run into a warning message saying that I should
> upgrade autoconf. I have 2.13 and I see here:
> http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/autoconf/
> that the autoconf 2.13 is nearly 5
On Sat, 1 Nov 2003, Anguo wrote:
> Moreover, without your help, I'd never found out about the
> different versions: when I type the full name, I never
> learn that there are alternatives:
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] alternatives]# urpmq autoconf
> autoconf
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] alternatives]# urp
Thank you Haywire, Greg and Arn for your replies.
On Saturday 01 Nov 2003 9:29 pm, Greg Meyer wrote:
> 2.5 is included with at least 9.1 and 9.2. Just 'urpmi
> autoconf2.5' or use rpmdrake to install it.
I am using Mandrake 9.2 (but haven't urpmi kernel yet, I
don't know which one to use).
I d
On Saturday, November 1, 2003 06:53 am, Anguo wrote:
> When I try to install application, compile stuff and so on,
> I regularly run into a warning message saying that I should
> upgrade autoconf. I have 2.13 and I see here:
> http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/autoconf/
> that the autoconf 2.13 is nearly 5 ye
On Sat, 1 Nov 2003 21:06:21 +0800
Anguo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered:
> Why is there a need to keep 2.13?
Many source packages may still want to build against that version, it's
best to leave it installed.
As you read in the autoconf README, most developers will provide for
choosing the appropria
Hello again,
I haven't done the symlink I suggested before. I am waiting
for your advice.
To illustrate my problems with autoconf:
urpmi automake gives me version 1.4-p6 which was released at
about the same time as 1.6, over one year ago.
I download the source and then:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] au
2.5 is included with at least 9.1 and 9.2. Just 'urpmi autoconf2.5' or use
rpmdrake to install it.
n Saturday 01 November 2003 07:53 am, Anguo wrote:
> hello,
>
> When I try to install application, compile stuff and so on,
> I regularly run into a warning message saying that I should
> upgrade a
On Saturday 01 Nov 2003 8:53 pm, Anguo wrote:
> hello,
>
> When I try to install application, compile stuff and so
> on, I regularly run into a warning message saying that I
> should upgrade autoconf.
> but I still get:
> $ autoconf --version
> Autoconf version 2.13
>
> $ export WANT_AUTOCONF_2_5
hello,
When I try to install application, compile stuff and so on,
I regularly run into a warning message saying that I should
upgrade autoconf. I have 2.13 and I see here:
http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/autoconf/
that the autoconf 2.13 is nearly 5 years old!!!
I tried urpme autoconf and then urpmi au
Hi !
I try to compile current k3b cvs, but I don't get the auto* stuff to
work. I nearly understand nothing of that, so maybe i find here someone
enlightened.
I simply started as it is proposed by the instructions on their website
and got
*** Creating configure
aclocal.m4:5542: error: m4_de
Somebody scribbled about Re: [expert] autoconf
>-- PLEASE NOTICE ---> this version is meant to coexist with
> autoconf-2.13 (for backwards compatibility); to that end, the various
Cool. I seem to remember that happening before. With a little bit of
checking I found it in the autoconf2.
On Friday 25 July 2003 11:16 pm, dfox wrote:
> Hello people
>
> I have my setup box mostly setup ;). With all the reinstalling and
> updating I've done in the past week, trying to find packages, getting
> updates, and so forth, I seem to be missing autoconf again. Now I
> remember that there were t
On Friday 25 July 2003 11:16 pm, dfox wrote:
> Hello people
>
> I have my setup box mostly setup ;). With all the reinstalling and
> updating I've done in the past week, trying to find packages, getting
> updates, and so forth, I seem to be missing autoconf again. Now I
> remember that there were t
Hello people
I have my setup box mostly setup ;). With all the reinstalling and
updating I've done in the past week, trying to find packages, getting
updates, and so forth, I seem to be missing autoconf again. Now I
remember that there were two divergent versions of autoconf, 2.1.3 (which
I j
On Sunday 20 October 2002 04:38 pm, dfox wrote:
> Somebody scribbled about Re: [expert] Autoconf / automake
>
> >There is nothing that I know of or have tried that can not be
> > built using 1.4.
>
> KDE fails. Seemingly more packages now seem to want the newer
> vers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A long question with (I hope) a simple answer:
On my LM 8.1 system I have to install a newer version of autoconf. Using
the rpm from rpmfind.net for autoconf 2.53-7, it says that it requires perl
>= 5.6.0. LM 8.1 rpm says that it has perl 5.601-6md
pesarif wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I need to compile KDE3 (so that I can apply a friend's source patches).
> Please tell me where I can get autoconf 2.52 and automake 1.5. I can't find
> them on rpmfind.net and don't want to compile autoconf/automake from source
> (if possible).
>
> Thanks,
> pesarif
Hi,
I need to compile KDE3 (so that I can apply a friend's source patches).
Please tell me where I can get autoconf 2.52 and automake 1.5. I can't find
them on rpmfind.net and don't want to compile autoconf/automake from source
(if possible).
Thanks,
pesarif
Want to buy your Pack or Se
autoconf and autoconf2.5 installed how do I use the 2.5 version?
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
19 matches
Mail list logo
