On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 07:32:59AM -0700, Jack Coates wrote:
[mutt]
I tried it a few times, never liked it enough to keep it though. Reminds
me of emacs (in that the tool is more complicated than the task).
Well, comparing mutt to emacs is not entirely wrong - both tools are
very powerful
On Tue, 2003-10-07 at 08:04, T. Ribbrock wrote:
...
Thomas (who likes ssh sessions... :-) )
I'm writing this in Evolution... which is being piped from an ADSL line
through two ssh -XC sessions :-)
--
Jack Coates
Monkeynoodle: A Scientific Venture...
Want to buy your Pack or Services from
On Tue, 2003-10-07 at 09:11, Jack Coates wrote:
On Tue, 2003-10-07 at 08:04, T. Ribbrock wrote:
...
Thomas (who likes ssh sessions... :-) )
I'm writing this in Evolution... which is being piped from an ADSL line
through two ssh -XC sessions :-)
Hey I found that reply to list feature in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello James,
On Tue, 07 Oct 2003 09:51:51 -0700, James Sparenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(and in one earlier post) wrote about Re: [expert] mutt (was: Reply-to):
Went from vi to mail to pine to Eudora to Sylpheed/Evolution. Somehow I
missed mutt
