Re: [expert] this one is harmless?

2003-09-10 Thread Charlie
On Wed, 10 Sep 2003 05:39 am, many eyes noted that Anne Wilson wrote: On Tuesday 09 Sep 2003 8:32 pm, ed tharp wrote: On Tue, 2003-09-09 at 11:48, Miark wrote: I'm fuzzy on the list mechanism. Do you have to be a subscriber to the list to send something to it? Or does subscribing only

Re: [expert] this one is harmless?

2003-09-10 Thread Anne Wilson
On Wednesday 10 Sep 2003 3:32 am, James Sparenberg wrote: On Tue, 2003-09-09 at 03:24, Anne Wilson wrote: On Tuesday 09 Sep 2003 5:55 am, Charlie wrote: Is someone interested in ancestry of :- linux, Linux Mandrake or ? Interesting one, that. Coming through with the Approved subject

Re: [expert] this one is harmless?

2003-09-10 Thread Miark
Ah! Okay fixed. Boy, is that going to make life a whole lot easier! Miark On Tue, 09 Sep 2003 19:43:27 -0700, James Sparenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Miark, Being a member should allow you to send IF you send from the same e-mail return address you receive on. For me if I send from

Re: [expert] this one is harmless?

2003-09-09 Thread Anne Wilson
On Tuesday 09 Sep 2003 5:55 am, Charlie wrote: Is someone interested in ancestry of :- linux, Linux Mandrake or ? Interesting one, that. Coming through with the Approved subject line I was immediately suspicious, but ancestry.com appears to be a genuine genealogy site for USA, and

Re: [expert] this one is harmless?

2003-09-09 Thread HaywireMac
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 11:24:05 +0100 Anne Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered: Interesting one, that. Coming through with the Approved subject line I was immediately suspicious, but ancestry.com appears to be a genuine genealogy site for USA, and rightnowtech.com looks genuine enough, so the

Re: [expert] this one is harmless?

2003-09-09 Thread Anne Wilson
On Tuesday 09 Sep 2003 1:47 pm, HaywireMac wrote: On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 11:24:05 +0100 Anne Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered: Interesting one, that. Coming through with the Approved subject line I was immediately suspicious, but ancestry.com appears to be a genuine genealogy site for USA,

Re: [expert] this one is harmless?

2003-09-09 Thread Eric Huff
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 11:24:05 +0100 Anne Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tuesday 09 Sep 2003 5:55 am, Charlie wrote: Is someone interested in ancestry of :- linux, Linux Mandrake or ? Interesting one, that. Coming through with the Approved subject line I was immediately suspicious, but

Re: [expert] this one is harmless?

2003-09-09 Thread Miark
I'm fuzzy on the list mechanism. Do you have to be a subscriber to the list to send something to it? Or does subscribing only allow you to receive messages? And since we have to confirm all messages that come to the list, how is it that any automated message could make it through to us? Miark

Re[2]: [expert] this one is harmless?

2003-09-09 Thread rikona
Hello Anne, Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 6:03:41 AM, you wrote: Interesting one, that. Coming through with the Approved subject line I was immediately suspicious, but ancestry.com appears to be a genuine genealogy site for USA, and rightnowtech.com looks genuine enough, so the only

Re: [expert] this one is harmless?

2003-09-09 Thread ed tharp
On Tue, 2003-09-09 at 11:48, Miark wrote: I'm fuzzy on the list mechanism. Do you have to be a subscriber to the list to send something to it? Or does subscribing only allow you to receive messages? And since we have to confirm all messages that come to the list, how is it that any

Re: [expert] this one is harmless?

2003-09-09 Thread Miark
Surely this is some sick joke. I have to confirm every message I send to the list. Here, I just did a test message and received this back: -- From: SYMPA [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: confirm

Re: [expert] this one is harmless?

2003-09-09 Thread ed tharp
On Tue, 2003-09-09 at 17:28, Miark wrote: Surely this is some sick joke. I have to confirm every message I send to the list. Here, I just did a test message and received this back: -- From: SYMPA [EMAIL

Re: [expert] this one is harmless?

2003-09-09 Thread Lee Wiggers
That's an improvement over the last time I changed addresses. Sympa wouldn't accept anything I did from anywhere. Lee On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 17:28:07 -0400 Miark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Surely this is some sick joke. I have to confirm every message I send to the list. Here, I just did a test

Re: [expert] this one is harmless?

2003-09-09 Thread James Sparenberg
On Tue, 2003-09-09 at 03:24, Anne Wilson wrote: On Tuesday 09 Sep 2003 5:55 am, Charlie wrote: Is someone interested in ancestry of :- linux, Linux Mandrake or ? Interesting one, that. Coming through with the Approved subject line I was immediately suspicious, but ancestry.com appears to

Re: [expert] this one is harmless?

2003-09-09 Thread James Sparenberg
On Tue, 2003-09-09 at 08:48, Miark wrote: I'm fuzzy on the list mechanism. Do you have to be a subscriber to the list to send something to it? Or does subscribing only allow you to receive messages? And since we have to confirm all messages that come to the list, how is it that any

[expert] this one is harmless?

2003-09-08 Thread Charlie
Is someone interested in ancestry of :- linux, Linux Mandrake or ? Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mta01bw.bigpond.com ([192.168.115.3]) by mailms4aps.email.bigpond.com (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15 mailms4aps Apr 29 2002 13:22:02) with ESMTP id HKWTNQ01.E60