That's the /root/tmp directory that's listed, not /tmp. You're right,
/tmp should have 1777 permissions, but /root/tmp should be 700.
-Matt Stegman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Mon, 10 Jul 2000, David Talbot wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Jul 2000, you wrote:
> > > don't delete while running X server but you s
On Fri, 07 Jul 2000, you wrote:
> > don't delete while running X server but you safely delete them before
> > running X (and it's what we do in the initscripts).
>
> What should the permissions be inside /root/tmp for X stuff ?
> Mine looks like this...
> [root: ~/tmp]# ll -d .
> drwx--2
Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
>
> "Brian T. Schellenberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > X would not start.
> >
> > *That* is the problem.
> >
> > /tmp should contain only temporary files; it should be perfectly safe to
> > wipe out the entire contents of /tmp and reboot, but with 7.0 it is not.
"Brian T. Schellenberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> X would not start.
>
> *That* is the problem.
>
> /tmp should contain only temporary files; it should be perfectly safe to
> wipe out the entire contents of /tmp and reboot, but with 7.0 it is not.
what is the permission of your /tmp dir
On Sat, Jul 08, 2000 at 11:05:17PM -0600, Steve Browne wrote:
> On 07 Jul 2000 12:11:04 -0700, you wrote:
>
> >Steve Browne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> When I boot Mandrake 7.1, the run list says at one point "clean-up
> >> /tmp". So /tmp is cleared out on every boot. /root/tmp is where t
Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
>
> "Brian T. Schellenberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > It seems pretty obvious that they DIDN'T think about it.
>
> i did the implementation of ''Clean up /tmp'' and i don't see what is
> the problem ? you can have problem if you have a cron who delete the
> .X*
On 07 Jul 2000 12:11:04 -0700, you wrote:
>Steve Browne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> When I boot Mandrake 7.1, the run list says at one point "clean-up
>> /tmp". So /tmp is cleared out on every boot. /root/tmp is where the X
>> files are that you shouldn't delete.
>
>yes right if you have the
"Brian T. Schellenberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It seems pretty obvious that they DIDN'T think about it.
i did the implementation of ''Clean up /tmp'' and i don't see what is
the problem ? you can have problem if you have a cron who delete the
.X* files when X running but since it is onl
Steve Browne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 06 Jul 2000 11:21:29 -0700, you wrote:
>
> >John Aldrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >> > ? ok what is the question excatly i didn't followed the thread...
> >> Thanks. :-) The question was why you folks put the stuff in /tmp and
> >> later
On Thu, 06 Jul 2000, you wrote:
>
> It seems pretty obvious that they DIDN'T think about it.
> It's been fixed in 7.1 anyway, as I understand it.
>
Sort of. It's now in /root/tmp, instead of /tmp. *shrug*
John
On Thu, 06 Jul 2000, you wrote:
> John Aldrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Wed, 05 Jul 2000, you wrote:
> > >
> > > Try it at
> > >
> > > http://forum.mandrakesoft.com
> > >
> > > Our own version of slashdot
> > >
> > I emaild Chmouel. Maybe he'll deign to post in here their thinking
> don't delete while running X server but you safely delete them before
> running X (and it's what we do in the initscripts).
What should the permissions be inside /root/tmp for X stuff ?
Mine looks like this...
[root: ~/tmp]# ll -d .
drwx--2 root root 2048 Jul 6 11:31 ./
[r
John Aldrich wrote:
>
> On Wed, 05 Jul 2000, you wrote:
> >
> > Try it at
> >
> > http://forum.mandrakesoft.com
> >
> > Our own version of slashdot
> >
> I emaild Chmouel. Maybe he'll deign to post in here their thinking on
> that subject. :-) It would be NICE if they'd use this mail list!
>
Mark Weaver wrote:
>
> Have you tried re-creating this directory? sorry if you already stated
> this in an earlier post. I don't have that one in my inbox any longer, but
> it seems to me that would be the next logical step in the process.
>
> I would think that /tmp would be an important part o
The people on cooker have answers, but you just have to be careful not to
ask too many non-cooker related questions, I guess.
>From: Chmouel Boudjnah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [expert] Deleted /tmp now X won't s
On 06 Jul 2000 11:21:29 -0700, you wrote:
>John Aldrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> > ? ok what is the question excatly i didn't followed the thread...
>> Thanks. :-) The question was why you folks put the stuff in /tmp and
>> later in /root/tmp that causes X to go bad when you delete it
Have you tried re-creating this directory? sorry if you already stated
this in an earlier post. I don't have that one in my inbox any longer, but
it seems to me that would be the next logical step in the process.
I would think that /tmp would be an important part of the file system and
a server s
John Aldrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 05 Jul 2000, you wrote:
> >
> > Try it at
> >
> > http://forum.mandrakesoft.com
> >
> > Our own version of slashdot
> >
> I emaild Chmouel. Maybe he'll deign to post in here their thinking on
> that subject. :-) It would be NICE if they'd use
John Aldrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > ? ok what is the question excatly i didn't followed the thread...
> Thanks. :-) The question was why you folks put the stuff in /tmp and
> later in /root/tmp that causes X to go bad when you delete it? You
we put nothing in /root/tmp only DrakConf
On Thu, 06 Jul 2000, you wrote:
> John Aldrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > Maybe a question for the cooker list? I don't really know how else to
> > > direct a question to the Mandrake team.
> > Maybe, but I've had the distinct impression that some of the
> > Mandrake team hang out in th
On Wed, 05 Jul 2000, you wrote:
>
> Try it at
>
> http://forum.mandrakesoft.com
>
> Our own version of slashdot
>
I emaild Chmouel. Maybe he'll deign to post in here their thinking on
that subject. :-) It would be NICE if they'd use this mail list!
John
John Aldrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Maybe a question for the cooker list? I don't really know how else to
> > direct a question to the Mandrake team.
> Maybe, but I've had the distinct impression that some of the
> Mandrake team hang out in this list apparently the ones who hang
> o
John Aldrich wrote:
> On Wed, 05 Jul 2000, you wrote:
> >
> > Maybe a question for the cooker list? I don't really know how else to
> > direct a question to the Mandrake team.
> >
> Maybe, but I've had the distinct impression that some of
> the Mandrake team hang out in this list apparently
On Wed, 05 Jul 2000, you wrote:
>
> Maybe a question for the cooker list? I don't really know how else to
> direct a question to the Mandrake team.
>
Maybe, but I've had the distinct impression that some of
the Mandrake team hang out in this list apparently the
ones who hang out either don'
Civileme wrote:
>
> Michael Holt wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Socket programming protocols basically form sockets for ONE task
> > > and then destroy it. In this case, it appears to be needed at
> > > boot time as the target of a symlink.
> > >
> > > Civileme
> >
> > Ok, that makes sense; which brings m
John Aldrich wrote:
>
> On Tue, 04 Jul 2000, you wrote:
> > > Has there ever been a satisfactory explanation of WHY they
> > > put PERMANENT stuff in a temporary directory? It seems
> > > rather loco to me to put ANYTHING you want to keep in a
> > > TEMP directory... :-)
> > > John
> >
>
Oh, wait! When you `ls -ld /tmp` do the permissions read:
drwxrwxrwt
If not, `chmod 1777 /tmp`, which should fix your permissions. Try
starting X again.
-Matt Stegman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Mon, 3 Jul 2000, John Aldrich wrote:
> On Mon, 03 Jul 2000, you wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 27, 2000 at 08
On Tue, 04 Jul 2000, you wrote:
> > Has there ever been a satisfactory explanation of WHY they
> > put PERMANENT stuff in a temporary directory? It seems
> > rather loco to me to put ANYTHING you want to keep in a
> > TEMP directory... :-)
> > John
>
> Is it something that is overwritten
Michael Holt wrote:
>
>
> > Socket programming protocols basically form sockets for ONE task
> > and then destroy it. In this case, it appears to be needed at
> > boot time as the target of a symlink.
> >
> > Civileme
>
> Ok, that makes sense; which brings my next question, what would be a
> s
> Socket programming protocols basically form sockets for ONE task
> and then destroy it. In this case, it appears to be needed at
> boot time as the target of a symlink.
>
> Civileme
Ok, that makes sense; which brings my next question, what would be a
simpler term for 'socket programming pro
Michael Holt wrote:
>
> John Aldrich wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 04 Jul 2000, you wrote:
> > >
> > > Yes, /tmp should be for temporary stuff. And this "stuff" is
> > > sockets, in this case, in a hidden directory. In 7.1 the use of
> > > /tmp for these sockets has been discontinued. Now they use
>
John Aldrich wrote:
>
> On Tue, 04 Jul 2000, you wrote:
> >
> > Yes, /tmp should be for temporary stuff. And this "stuff" is
> > sockets, in this case, in a hidden directory. In 7.1 the use of
> > /tmp for these sockets has been discontinued. Now they use
> > /root/tmp which most people leave
John Aldrich wrote:
>
> On Mon, 03 Jul 2000, you wrote:
> > I would like to add a question here if I may; I'm used to Windows where the
> > 'temp' directory is for temporary stuff and should be dumped periodically.
> > What is the /tmp directory in *nix used for and why can't I delete it's
> > co
On Tue, 4 Jul 2000, John Aldrich wrote:
> On Tue, 04 Jul 2000, you wrote:
> >
> > Yes, /tmp should be for temporary stuff. And this "stuff" is
> > sockets, in this case, in a hidden directory. In 7.1 the use of
> > /tmp for these sockets has been discontinued. Now they use
> > /root/tmp which
On Tue, 04 Jul 2000, you wrote:
>
> Yes, /tmp should be for temporary stuff. And this "stuff" is
> sockets, in this case, in a hidden directory. In 7.1 the use of
> /tmp for these sockets has been discontinued. Now they use
> /root/tmp which most people leave alone.
>
Has there ever been a
On Mon, Jul 03, 2000 at 05:28:56PM -0700, Mike & Tracy Holt wrote:
> I would like to add a question here if I may; I'm used to Windows where the
> 'temp' directory is for temporary stuff and should be dumped periodically.
> What is the /tmp directory in *nix used for and why can't I delete it's
>
John Aldrich wrote:
>
> On Mon, 03 Jul 2000, you wrote:
> > I would like to add a question here if I may; I'm used to Windows where the
> > 'temp' directory is for temporary stuff and should be dumped periodically.
> > What is the /tmp directory in *nix used for and why can't I delete it's
> > co
On Mon, 03 Jul 2000, you wrote:
> I would like to add a question here if I may; I'm used to Windows where the
> 'temp' directory is for temporary stuff and should be dumped periodically.
> What is the /tmp directory in *nix used for and why can't I delete it's
> contents?
>
Generally, it's exactl
I would like to add a question here if I may; I'm used to Windows where the
'temp' directory is for temporary stuff and should be dumped periodically.
What is the /tmp directory in *nix used for and why can't I delete it's
contents?
Thanks, Mike
> On Mon, 03 Jul 2000, you wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun
On Tue, 27 Jun 2000, you wrote:
> Experts -
>
> Like an idiot, I accidentally deleted my /tmp directory.
> I recreated the directory, but after rebooting, X fails to
> start. It seems to be stuck in an infinite loop trying to
> start X or KDM.
> I can boot into text mode fine.
>
> What can I
On Mon, 03 Jul 2000, you wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2000 at 08:20:54AM -0400, Thiessen David G DLVA wrote:
>
> > Like an idiot, I accidentally deleted my /tmp directory.
> > I recreated the directory, but after rebooting, X fails to
> > start. It seems to be stuck in an infinite loop trying to
>
On Tue, Jun 27, 2000 at 08:20:54AM -0400, Thiessen David G DLVA wrote:
> Like an idiot, I accidentally deleted my /tmp directory.
> I recreated the directory, but after rebooting, X fails to
> start. It seems to be stuck in an infinite loop trying to
> start X or KDM.
> I can boot into text mo
42 matches
Mail list logo