On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 4:02 AM, wrote:
>
> There are my last 2 attemps. The first, commented out version finishes
> without waiting for the threads to finish (even with the ugly hack of
> reading the state>> of the thread) while in the second the receiving
> thread doesn't
>
> I thought of parallel-map first but I wanted to do a bit more than that,
> otherwise I could just write a script that handles one and feed it to
> GNU parallel. I wanted to achieve more than what I can with GNU parallel
> (which is able to parallelize on multiple cores and writes correctly to
Hi John,
On 2016-11-08 16:52, John Benediktsson wrote:
>>
>> In that case I guess the mailing list makes more sense. Unless there's
>> people reading the IRC logs and not part of the mailing list.
>>
>
> The mailing list can be a fine place, or GitHub issues if you run into
> some
> problems
>
> In that case I guess the mailing list makes more sense. Unless there's
> people reading the IRC logs and not part of the mailing list.
>
The mailing list can be a fine place, or GitHub issues if you run into some
problems with Factor. If you are worried about higher volume of
conversation,
Hi Jon,
On 2016-11-07 22:34, Jon Harper wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 3:07 PM, wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am tinkering with factor and was wondering if it is OK to pick your
>> brains here? As I play around with the language questions come up that
>> are