How do I use the keyboard keys to cycle back through old
expressions?
Currently I have to scroll to the old position and
double-click to
re-enter it.
See
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 9:26 PM, Shaping shap...@charter.net wrote:
How do I use the keyboard keys to cycle back through old expressions?
Currently I have to scroll to the old position and double-click to
re-enter it.
http://docs.factorcode.org/content/article-ui-listener.html
Chris.
--
I've noticed that the online EBNF help is not the same as
that in the local
Help Browser.
It is the same, except for possible minor differences
between Factor
versions. If you go:
peg.ebnf about
How do I use the keyboard keys to cycle
back through old
expressions?
Currently I have to scroll to the old
position and double-click to
re-enter it.
[...]
Again there is the opacity problem. What does the
~vector~ mean?
And why would I ever want to read such a general
description of a
2-vector? It doesn't say much about what is in the tree.
You're
EBNF: expr
digit = '1' | '2' | '3' | '4'
number = digit digit*
expr = number (('+' | '-') number)*
;EBNF
I was able to evaluate this expression immediately in the Listener and on a
word I defined in my own
Shaping shap...@charter.net writes:
snip
Doing the immediate eval leaves
T{ parser f ~action-parser~ f 4820 }
How am I expected to use this notation?. I read: a parser instance,
constant f (false), something to do with a parse and its action, another
false constant, number 4820. I can't
Shaping shap...@charter.net writes:
How do I use the keyboard keys to cycle back through old expressions?
Currently I have to scroll to the old position and double-click to re-enter
it.
See
http://docs.factorcode.org/content/article-gadgets-editors-commands.html
Rupert
P.S. Is there any way
Shaping shap...@charter.net writes:
I've discovered the inspector recently. It is a good inspector, at least as
interesting as the Smalltalk inspectors. The GUI is not polished visually,
but it actually works better than most of the stuff that MS produces: there
is no flicker at all during
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 1:18 AM, Shaping shap...@charter.net wrote:
I've noticed that the online EBNF help is not the same as that in the local
Help Browser.
It is the same, except for possible minor differences between Factor
versions. If you go:
peg.ebnf about
You will get the 'about' page
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 6:57 AM, Rupert Swarbrick rswarbr...@gmail.com wrote:
Incidentally, has it occurred to you that the authors of this program
(not me!) are the most active members of this list? Also, that the
author of a program might take some offence at being told that it is
I
On Nov 10, 2010, at 6:27 PM, Rupert Swarbrick rswarbr...@gmail.com wrote:
Incidentally, has it occurred to you that the authors of this program
(not me!) are the most active members of this list? Also, that the
author of a program might take some offence at being told that it is
not polished
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 12:47 AM, Shaping shap...@charter.net wrote:
I tried the first two yellow blocks in this article
http://www.bluishcoder.co.nz/2007/11/embedded-grammars-in-factor.html
The syntax has changed quite a bit since that post. The example would
now be something like:
EBNF:
-Original Message-
From: Shaping [mailto:shap...@charter.net]
Sent: 2010-November-09, 05:47
To: factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Factor-talk] PEGs
I tried the first two yellow blocks in this article
http://www.bluishcoder.co.nz/2007/11/embedded-grammars-in-factor.html
The first
14 matches
Mail list logo
