Hello list.
How would one use the cleave combinator to accumulate results into a
sequence instead of onto the stack?
Initially I have one object on the stack and five quotations to apply to it.
Makes sense to define a 5array operation?
Still, there should be a general way to get the results
You can use outputarray in combinators.smart.
On Aug 26, 2014 8:09 PM, mr wzrd wzr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello list.
How would one use the cleave combinator to accumulate results into a
sequence instead of onto the stack?
Initially I have one object on the stack and five quotations to apply
That's not the problem. It shouldn't care what types are going to be in the
array.
Try a simpler example first, or experiment with { } outputsequence.
On Aug 26, 2014 8:30 PM, mr wzrd wzr...@gmail.com wrote:
outputarray does not seem to like the fact that the objects on the
stack are arrays.
Generic word call does not define a method for the array class.
Dispatching on object: { asdf }
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 11:56 PM, Doug Coleman doug.cole...@gmail.com wrote:
That's not the problem. It shouldn't care what types are going to be in the
array.
Try a simpler example first, or
Er, I am daft. Ignored the fact that outputarray expects a quotation.
Sometimes it just takes a short break from the keyboard to regain the senses.
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 12:05 AM, Doug Coleman doug.cole...@gmail.com wrote:
Check out the unit tests and pattern it after that or paste the code.
Sometimes it just takes a short break from the keyboard to let the
stupidity evaporate.
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 1:13 AM, mr wzrd wzr...@gmail.com wrote:
Er, I am daft. Ignored the fact that outputarray expects a quotation.
Sometimes it just takes a short break from the keyboard to regain the
