>
> > Now that you mention it, I might work on an "auto-dot" upgrade so maybe
> we can just prettyprint the stack and all examples don't need to do it
> themselves.
>
> That's an interesting idea. Would that be difficult to do?
It might be easier with the new parser, where it could "lex" the ex
02.11.2016, 02:03, "John Benediktsson" :
> Now that you mention it, I might work on an "auto-dot" upgrade so maybe we
> can just prettyprint the stack and all examples don't need to do it
> themselves.
That's an interesting idea. Would that be difficult to do?
---=---
Александр
---
Now that you mention it, I might work on an "auto-dot" upgrade so maybe we can
just prettyprint the stack and all examples don't need to do it themselves.
> On Nov 1, 2016, at 3:54 PM, Alexander Ilin wrote:
>
> 02.11.2016, 01:39, "John Benediktsson" :
>> You need to use prettyprint also and `
02.11.2016, 01:39, "John Benediktsson" :
> You need to use prettyprint also and ``.`` it after make-tuple.
Thank you!
---=---
Александр
--
Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors
Access to Intel Xe
You need to use prettyprint also and ``.`` it after make-tuple.
> On Nov 1, 2016, at 3:10 PM, Alexander Ilin wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> I've created an example code for the `make-tuple` word, but I can't make it
> through `help-lint`. Could someone give me a hint on what's going on?
>
> Here's m
