Re: [Factor-talk] kernel.private missing in git build

Hi - modest revision to the USING linter here Positive/negative feedback very welcome. ~cw On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 5:48 PM, CW Alston wrote: > Hi cat - I have a preliminary gist here >

Re: [Factor-talk] kernel.private missing in git build

Hi cat - I have a preliminary gist here . Feel free to take a look. I have a revision in progress, and I'll edit the gist soon. I've long pondered the un-needed vocabs conundrum, so thanks for bringing it up. John's regexp gave me t

Re: [Factor-talk] kernel.private missing in git build

Apropos my reply, this probably a good moment to ask for some advice. I had noticed that `see` reports a restricted USING list for individual words, not the whole list for the file that a word is defined in. Thinking that may be a way to reveal the minimal set of vocabs needed for my target vocab's

Re: [Factor-talk] kernel.private missing in git build

I'd be interested to follow your development of that linter, I think you should put it in a GitHub repository stat :) Original Message On February 6, 2018 7:56 PM, CW Alston wrote: > Ah, thanks for the reassurance John - > This tells me that my own monkeying around must have c

Re: [Factor-talk] kernel.private missing in git build

Ah, thanks for the reassurance John - This tells me that my own monkeying around must have caused my problem. I'm trying to write a linter vocab for USING: ... ; forms ( see cat's previous message), building on your neat regexp suggestion: "resource:core/math/math.factor" utf8 file-contents

Re: [Factor-talk] kernel.private missing in git build

That's weird because kernel.private has been there since March 2016 (6b07e6caf22b290805ddf9acedd7163165860b3c). I also see it in the binary releases. On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 9:08 PM, CW Alston wrote: > Hi folks - > After doing a Factor git update via: > > cd factor > ./build.sh update > > - At F