Slava wrote:
> Do you think it would be a good idea to put the || and && combinators
> in combinators.short-circuit?
Done.
-
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just
Am 13.06.2008 um 15:56 schrieb Phil Dawes:
> Eduardo Cavazos wrote:
>> Also, || and && might be doable as "smart combinators" and I
>> believe Crest
>> even coded up an implementation. So how do you feel about using smart
>> versions of these instead of the arity variants? I believe you once
On Jun 13, 2008, at 2:35 AM, Eduardo Cavazos wrote:
> On Friday 13 June 2008 01:33:08 Slava Pestov wrote:
>
>> Do you think it would be a good idea to put the || and && combinators
>> in combinators.short-circuit? combinators.lib is getting large and
>> disorganized.
>
> Sounds OK to me.
>
> You
Eduardo Cavazos wrote:
> Also, || and && might be doable as "smart combinators" and I believe Crest
> even coded up an implementation. So how do you feel about using smart
> versions of these instead of the arity variants? I believe you once mentioned
> that the problem you see is that they'll o
Am 13.06.2008 um 09:35 schrieb Eduardo Cavazos:
> On Friday 13 June 2008 01:33:08 Slava Pestov wrote:
>
>> Do you think it would be a good idea to put the || and && combinators
>> in combinators.short-circuit? combinators.lib is getting large and
>> disorganized.
>
> Sounds OK to me.
>
> You ment
On Friday 13 June 2008 01:33:08 Slava Pestov wrote:
> Do you think it would be a good idea to put the || and && combinators
> in combinators.short-circuit? combinators.lib is getting large and
> disorganized.
Sounds OK to me.
You mentioned moving them into core. Do you still want to do that or a
