For my use case, it’s overkill…no need to have all modes enabled...
> On Jul 7, 2020, at 12:30 PM, Nick Howitt wrote:
>
> Why couldn't you just enable aggressive mode?
>
> On 07/07/2020 20:27, Antonio Leding wrote:
>> Thanks Nick & Graham — I have this working now and wanted to provide some
Why couldn't you just enable aggressive mode?
On 07/07/2020 20:27, Antonio Leding
wrote:
Thanks Nick & Graham — I have this working now and wanted to
provide some quick notes for those who might walk down this path
in the future:
Thanks Nick & Graham — I have this working now and wanted to provide some quick
notes for those who might walk down this path in the future:
RE can be tested using the “fail2ban-regex” command — I found this incredibly
helpful.
New RE and mode changes can be placed into the desired [ FILTER
On 06/07/2020 09:41, Graham wrote:
On Mon, 6 Jul 2020, Antonio Leding wrote:
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2020 04:38:14
From: Antonio Leding
To: fail2ban-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Fail2ban-users] Parsing "Invalid authentication mechanism" in
postfix
I have a Postfix + fail2ban
On Mon, 6 Jul 2020, Antonio Leding wrote:
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2020 04:38:14
From: Antonio Leding
To: fail2ban-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Fail2ban-users] Parsing "Invalid authentication mechanism" in
postfix
I have a Postfix + fail2ban configured to ban when it encounters SASL auth
