THE Martin Luther King Jr. Memorial was to be dedicated on the National Mall on 
Sunday — exactly 56 years after the murder of Emmett Till in Mississippi and 48 
years after the historic March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom. (Because of 
Hurricane Irene, the ceremony has been postponed.) 
These events constitute major milestones in the turbulent history of race and 
democracy in America, and the undeniable success of the civil rights movement — 
culminating in the election of Barack Obama in 2008 — warrants our attention 
and elation. Yet the prophetic words of Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel still 
haunt us: “The whole future of America depends on the impact and influence of 
Dr. King.” 
Rabbi Heschel spoke those words during the last years of King’s life, when 72 
percent of whites and 55 percent of blacks disapproved of King’s opposition to 
the Vietnam War and his efforts to eradicate poverty in America. King’s dream 
of a more democratic America had become, in his words, “a nightmare,” owing to 
the persistence of “racism, poverty, militarism and materialism.” He called 
America a “sick society.” On the Sunday after his assassination, in 1968, he 
was to have preached a sermon titled “Why America May Go to Hell.” 
King did not think that America ought to go to hell, but rather that it might 
go to hell owing to its economic injustice, cultural decay and political 
paralysis. He was not an American Gibbon, chronicling the decline and fall of 
the American empire, but a courageous and visionary Christian blues man, 
fighting with style and love in the face of the four catastrophes he 
identified. 
Militarism is an imperial catastrophe that has produced a military-industrial 
complex and national security state and warped the country’s priorities and 
stature (as with the immoral drones, dropping bombs on innocent civilians). 
Materialism is a spiritual catastrophe, promoted by a corporate media multiplex 
and a culture industry that have hardened the hearts of hard-core consumers and 
coarsened the consciences of would-be citizens. Clever gimmicks of mass 
distraction yield a cheap soulcraft of addicted and self-medicated narcissists. 
Racism is a moral catastrophe, most graphically seen in the prison industrial 
complex and targeted police surveillance in black and brown ghettos rendered 
invisible in public discourse. Arbitrary uses of the law — in the name of the 
“war” on drugs — have produced, in the legal scholar Michelle Alexander’s apt 
phrase, a new Jim Crow of mass incarceration. And poverty is an economic 
catastrophe, inseparable from the power of greedy oligarchs and avaricious 
plutocrats indifferent to the misery of poor children, elderly citizens and 
working people. 
The age of Obama has fallen tragically short of fulfilling King’s prophetic 
legacy. Instead of articulating a radical democratic vision and fighting for 
homeowners, workers and poor people in the form of mortgage relief, jobs and 
investment in education, infrastructure and housing, the administration gave us 
bailouts for banks, record profits for Wall Street and giant budget cuts on the 
backs of the vulnerable. 
As the talk show host Tavis Smiley and I have said in our national tour against 
poverty, the recent budget deal is only the latest phase of a 30-year, 
top-down, one-sided war against the poor and working people in the name of a 
morally bankrupt policy of deregulating markets, lowering taxes and cutting 
spending for those already socially neglected and economically abandoned. Our 
two main political parties, each beholden to big money, offer merely 
alternative versions of oligarchic rule. 
The absence of a King-worthy narrative to reinvigorate poor and working people 
has enabled right-wing populists to seize the moment with credible claims about 
government corruption and ridiculous claims about tax cuts’ stimulating growth. 
This right-wing threat is a catastrophic response to King’s four catastrophes; 
its agenda would lead to hellish conditions for most Americans. 
King weeps from his grave. He never confused substance with symbolism. He never 
conflated a flesh and blood sacrifice with a stone and mortar edifice. We 
rightly celebrate his substance and sacrifice because he loved us all so 
deeply. Let us not remain satisfied with symbolism because we too often fear 
the challenge he embraced. Our greatest writer, Herman Melville, who spent his 
life in love with America even as he was our most fierce critic of the myth of 
American exceptionalism, noted, “Truth uncompromisingly told will always have 
its ragged edges; hence the conclusion of such a narration is apt to be less 
finished than an architectural finial.” 
King’s response to our crisis can be put in one word: revolution. A revolution 
in our priorities, a re-evaluation of our values, a reinvigoration of our 
public life and a fundamental transformation of our way of thinking and living 
that promotes a transfer of power from oligarchs and plutocrats to everyday 
people and ordinary citizens. 
In concrete terms, this means support for progressive politicians like Senator 
Bernard Sanders of Vermont and Mark Ridley-Thomas, a Los Angeles County 
supervisor; extensive community and media organizing; civil disobedience; and 
life and death confrontations with the powers that be. Like King, we need to 
put on our cemetery clothes and be coffin-ready for the next great democratic 
battle. 

Cornel West, a philosopher, is a professor at Princeton. 

Reply via email to