This film by Martin McDonough (writer-director of "In Bruges") has been
called similar to the work of Quentin Tarantino. And that's true, but I
liked it almost as much as I liked "Django Unchained," which means that
I thought it was one of the best films of the year. But many people
won't agree, because both the plot and the dialogue will be too quirky
for them. Take as an example of the latter an early exchange between a
guy named Marty writing a screenplay and his buddy Billy:

Billy: How's the Seven Psychopaths coming, Marty?
Marty: Slow, slow. I've got the title, y'know...just haven't been able
to come up with all the psychopaths yet.
Billy: How many you got?
Marty: One. And he ain't really much of a psychopath. He's more of
a...kind of a Buddhist.
Billy: A Buddhist?
Marty: Yeah, I'm sick of all these stereotypical Hollywood murderer
scumbag type psychopath movies. I don't want it to be one more film
about guys with guns in their hands. I want it...overall...to be about
love...and peace. But it still has to be about these seven psychopaths,
so this Buddhist psychopath, he...he doesn't believe in violence. I
don't know what the fuck he's going to do in the movie.

Marty later changes his mind, and turns the Buddhist psychopath into a
Quaker psychopath, but the movie winds up having a Buddhist in it
anyway. Don't ask me to explain how.

This is a very quirky movie written by a guy named Marty about a guy
named Marty writing a movie, and as such is kind of a cinematic moebius
strip. It's also got (to say the least) a great cast, including Sam
Rockwell, Colin Farrell, Abbie Cornish, Christopher Walken, Harry Dean
Stanton, Tom Waits, and Woody Harrelson.

I liked it, but it's WAY too convoluted for me to try to explain to you
why, so I'll let Roger Ebert explain why he liked it. He gave it 3-1/2
stars (out of four); I would have gone for four.

http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20121010/REVIE\
WS/121019997/0/wikipedia
 
<http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20121010/REVI\
EWS/121019997/0/wikipedia>


Reply via email to