Hopefully to counterbalance some of the crap with which you choose to fill
your head:
------------

CLIMATE-CHANGE CALCULUS
WHY IT'S EVEN WORSE THAN WE FEARED
By Sharon Begley 
Newsweek 
August 3rd Issue, 2009

http://www.newsweek.com/id/208164

Among the phrases you really, really do not want to hear from climate
scientists are: "that really shocked us," "we had no idea how bad it was,"
and "reality is well ahead of the climate models." Yet in speaking to
researchers who focus on the Arctic, you hear comments like these so
regularly they begin to sound like the thumping refrain from Jaws: annoying
harbingers of something that you really, really wish would go away.

Let me deconstruct the phrases above. The "shock" came when the
International Polar Year, a global consortium studying the Arctic, froze a
small vessel into the sea ice off eastern Siberia in September 2006.
Norwegian explorer Fridtjof Nansen had done the same thing a century before,
and his Fram, carried by the drifting ice, emerged off eastern Greenland 34
months later. IPY scientists thought their Tara would take 24 to 36 months.
But it reached Greenland in just 14 months, stark evidence that the sea ice
found a more open, ice-free, and thus faster path westward thanks to Arctic
melting.

The loss of Arctic sea ice "is well ahead of" what the Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change forecast, largely because emissions of carbon
dioxide have topped what the panel -- which foolishly expected nations to
care enough about global warming to do something about it -- projected. "The
models just aren't keeping up" with the reality of CO2 emissions, says the
IPY's David Carlson. Although policymakers hoped climate models would prove
to be alarmist, the opposite is true, particularly in the Arctic.

The IPCC may also have been too cautious on Greenland, assuming that the
melting of its glaciers would contribute little to sea-level rise. Some
studies found that Greenland's glacial streams were surging and surface ice
was morphing into liquid lakes, but others made a strong case that those
surges and melts were aberrations, not long-term trends. It seemed to be a
standoff. More reliable data, however, such as satellite measurements of
Greenland's mass, show that it is losing about 52 cubic miles per year and
that the melting is accelerating. So while the IPCC projected that sea level
would rise 16 inches this century, "now a more likely figure is one meter
[39 inches] at the least," says Carlson. "Chest high instead of knee high,
with half to two thirds of that due to Greenland." Hence the "no idea how
bad it was."

The frozen north had another surprise in store. Scientists have long known
that permafrost, if it melted, would release carbon, exacerbating global
warming, which would melt more permafrost, which would add more to global
warming, on and on in a feedback loop. But estimates of how much carbon is
locked into Arctic permafrost were, it turns out, woefully off. "It's about
three times as much as was thought, about 1.6 trillion metric tons, which
has surprised a lot of people," says Edward Schuur of the University of
Florida. "It means the potential for positive feedbacks is greatly
increased." That 1.6 trillion tons is about twice the amount now in the
atmosphere. And Schuur's measurements of how quickly CO2 can come out of
permafrost, reported in May, were also a surprise: 1 billion to 2 billion
tons per year. Cars and light trucks in the U.S. emit about 300 million tons
per year.

In an insightful observation in The Guardian this month, Jim Watson of the
University of Sussex wrote that "a new breed of climate sceptic is becoming
more common": someone who doubts not the science but the policy response.
Given the pathetic (non)action on global warming at the G8 summit, and the
fact that the energy/climate bill passed by the House of Representatives is
so full of holes and escape hatches that it has barely a prayer of averting
dangerous climate change, skepticism that the world will get its act
together seems appropriate. For instance, the G8, led by Europe, has vowed
to take steps to keep global warming below 2 degrees Celsius by reducing CO2
emissions. We're now at 0.8 degree. But the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere
is already enough to raise the mercury 2 degrees. The only reason it hasn't
is that the atmosphere is full of crap (dust and aerosols that contribute to
asthma, emphysema, and other diseases) that acts as a global coolant. As
that pollution is reduced for health reasons, we're going to blast right
through 2 degrees, which is enough to ex-acerbate droughts and storms, wreak
havoc on agriculture, and produce a planet warmer than it's been in millions
of years. The 2-degree promise is a mirage.

The test of whether the nations of the world care enough to act will come in
December, when 192 countries meet in Copenhagen to hammer out a climate
treaty. Carlson vows that IPY will finish its Arctic assessment in time for
the meeting, and one conclusion is already clear. "A consensus has developed
during IPY that the Greenland ice sheet will disappear," he says. Cue the
Jaws music.

............

NHNE's Climate Change Resource Page:
http://www.nhne.org/tabid/490/Default.aspx

NHNE's 1000 Most Recent Climate Change Articles:
http://www.nhne.org/tabid/1050/Default.aspx

------------

NHNE Wavemaker News List:

Send Some Green Love To NHNE:
http://www.nhne.org/DONATE/tabid/398/Default.aspx

To subscribe, send a message to:
nhnenews-subscr...@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:nhnenews-subscribe%40yahoogroups.com> 

To unsubscribe, send a message to:
nhnenews-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:nhnenews-unsubscribe%40yahoogroups.com> 

To review current posts:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/nhnenews/messages
http://www.nhne.org/tabid/1044/Default.aspx

Visit NHNE's Mother Ship:
http://www.nhne.org/

Visit NHNE's Online Community:
http://nhnecommunity.ning.com/

Visit Integral NHNE:
http://integralnhne.ning.com/

Sunfellow & NHNE on Twitter:
http://twitter.com/sunfellow

Published by David Sunfellow
NewHeavenNewEarth (NHNE)
eMail: n...@nhne.org <mailto:nhne%40nhne.org> 
Phone: (928) 257-3200
Fax: (815) 642-0117

P.O. Box 2242
Sedona, AZ 86339
 

Reply via email to