Some who have avoided the common TM malady of having brain matter the
consistency of the lightness of cotton fiber :-) may have heard of DoS -- a
Denial of Service attack. That's where hackers and other social perverts use
technological means to keep users of a popular site from contacting that
But, can you levitate, Mr. Wright? Can you levitate?
On 9/3/2014 8:04 AM, TurquoiseBee turquoi...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
wrote:
Some who have avoided the common TM malady of having brain matter the
consistency of the lightness of cotton fiber :-) may have heard of
DoS -- a Denial of
From now on, when someone gets banned for overposting, the ban will cover
not just one calendar week from the day they overposted, but the remainder
of that week, plus the entire following week, Friday to Friday. So for
instance, Shemp, who overposted yesterday, will be out until a week from
On Oct 8, 2008, at 1:09 PM, Rick Archer wrote:
From now on, when someone gets banned for overposting, the ban will
cover not just one calendar week from the day they overposted, but
the remainder of that week, plus the entire following week, Friday
to Friday. So for instance, Shemp, who
Rick Archer wrote:
From now on, when someone gets banned for overposting, the ban will cover
not just one calendar week from the day they overposted, but the remainder
of that week, plus the entire following week, Friday to Friday. So for
instance, Shemp, who overposted yesterday, will be out
Here are the overposters for last week:
Spraig – 99
New Morning – 62
Vaj, Turq, and R. Williams – 51
I’ll give the last three the benefit of the doubt, because sometimes I get
duplicate emails, so my count isn’t 100% accurate, but Spraig and New
Morning are clearly over, and I’ll have to
Judy and Shemp are both over by 2. Turq intentionally went over by one last
week and I didn’t suspend him, so in fairness to them, I’ll cut them some
slack. But if either of them posts again before Friday night, I’ll have to
suspend them. Judy for one week, Shemp for 3.
No virus found in this
On Jan 31, 2008, at 11:02 AM, Rick Archer wrote:
Judy and Shemp are both over by 2. Turq intentionally went over by
one last week and I didn’t suspend him, so in fairness to them,
I’ll cut them some slack. But if either of them posts again before
Friday night, I’ll have to suspend them.
59 posts since Friday midnight. Judy has 30. No one else is very close. The
limit is 25 per week. Please keep a tally of your own posts.
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.22/1112 - Release Date: 11/5/2007
7:11 PM
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Rick Archer
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 9:35 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Overposting - Angela's done for the week
59 posts since Friday midnight. Judy has 30. No one else is very
I'm seeing 38 posts for Judy and 37 for Shemp, and we've got one day to go.
Yahoo has been sending some duplicate emails, so if you're certain of a more
accurate count, you may be within the limit, but you must be getting close.
Rick Archer
President
SearchSummit
Why mess with what already works so nicely?
On May 3, 2007, at 1:17 AM, Rick Archer wrote:
Judy posted 10 times today, so she joins Shemp in moderation land.
No posts for her until Friday. Curtis overposted by one. Light slap
on the wrist. Even though everyone but New Morning is opposed to
It would be easier for you, Rick, if you informed the
overposters that their posts beyond 5 or 35 would be
deleted. I certainly would not get into the hassle of
storing them and approving them so that 11 posts today
are approved at the rate of 5 today and 5 tomorrow and
1 the next day.
--- Rick
On May 3, 2007, at 7:20 AM, Vaj wrote:
Why mess with what already works so nicely?
On May 3, 2007, at 1:17 AM, Rick Archer wrote:
Judy posted 10 times today, so she joins Shemp in moderation land. No
posts for her until Friday. Curtis overposted by one. Light slap on
the wrist. Even though
In a message dated 5/3/07 12:17:43 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I’m seriously thinking of trying the 35 posts-per-week system. You can shoot
your wad in one day and we won’t hear from you for a week, or you can pace
yourself
This plan has my vote.
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Vaj
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2007 7:21 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Overposting
Why mess with what already works so nicely?
We can always go back to 5 a day if 35 a week doesn't work
On May 3, 2007, at 11:37 AM, Rick Archer wrote:
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Vaj
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2007 7:21 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Overposting
Why mess with what already works so nicely?
We can
lets stay as we are but for the sake of change do so for a week.
** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
Rick Archer wrote:
Judy posted 10 times today, so she joins Shemp in moderation land. No posts
for her until Friday. Curtis overposted by one. Light slap on the wrist.
Even though everyone but New Morning is opposed to it, I'm seriously
thinking of trying the 35 posts-per-week system. You can
Judy posted 10 times today, so she joins Shemp in moderation land. No posts
for her until Friday. Curtis overposted by one. Light slap on the wrist.
Even though everyone but New Morning is opposed to it, I'm seriously
thinking of trying the 35 posts-per-week system. You can shoot your wad in
one
20 matches
Mail list logo
