---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote :
Where I come from, silence usually indicates agreement. When normal people are
having a conversation at a bar and someone tells a scurrilous lie about your
friend and you know it's a lie not based on any evidence, if you don't
The rule defines consent as an affirmative, conscious and voluntary agreement.”
Towards a greater clarity in FFL forum discussion I feel we should adopt the
California decorum for discussion and drop away from the Texas norm.
Silence should no longer mean agreement here and that
Buck, I agree with this completely and thank you for making this point.
Richard, I'm sorry but I don't agree with you that silence implies agreement.
Heck, a person could be unresponsive to a post simply because they haven't read
it! Or maybe it hasn't even arrived in their inbox!
Also, if
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote :
Buck, I agree with this completely and thank you for making this point.
Richard, I'm sorry but I don't agree with you that silence implies agreement.
Heck, a person could be unresponsive to a post simply because they haven't read
salyavin, is this what they mean by quantum entanglement?!
On Monday, September 29, 2014 9:27 AM, salyavin808 no_re...@yahoogroups.com
wrote:
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote :
Buck, I agree with this completely and thank you for making this point.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote :
Salyavin, is this what they mean by quantum entanglement?!
Probably only something highly complex and profound like that could account
for it.
Let's wait and see how Buck responds, if he's silent we'll know I was right.
LOL salyavin and I think we have just discovered something beyond quantum
entanglement! I say this because I thought you were waiting for a reply from
Richard, not Buck!
On Monday, September 29, 2014 9:39 AM, salyavin808 no_re...@yahoogroups.com
wrote:
---In
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote :
LOL salyavin and I think we have just discovered something beyond quantum
entanglement! I say this because I thought you were waiting for a reply from
Richard, not Buck!
Dearest Share,
I am sure that both Richard and buck
dear Dan, thank you for clarifying (-:
big hug from Share
On Monday, September 29, 2014 9:48 AM, danfriedman2002
no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote:
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote :
LOL salyavin and I think we have just discovered something beyond quantum
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote :
dear Dan, thank you for clarifying (-:
big hug from Share
Dearest Share,
I always feel your Love. What I do here is not for anyone's appreciation but
yours.
Enjoy!
On Monday, September 29, 2014 9:48 AM,
On 9/29/2014 7:36 AM, dhamiltony...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote:
The rule defines consent as an affirmative, conscious and voluntary
agreement.”
Towards a greater clarity in FFL forum discussion I feel we should
adopt the California decorum for discussion and drop away from the
Texas
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote :
On 9/29/2014 7:36 AM, dhamiltony2k5@... mailto:dhamiltony2k5@...
[FairfieldLife] wrote:
The rule defines consent as an affirmative, conscious and voluntary
agreement.”
Towards a greater clarity in FFL forum discussion I feel we
On 9/29/2014 9:23 AM, Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
wrote:
Buck, I agree with this completely and thank you for making this
point. Richard, I'm sorry but I don't agree with you that silence
implies agreement.
That doesn't mean that you have to post a comment to every single
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote :
Buck, I agree with this completely and thank you for making this
point. Richard, I'm sorry but I don't agree with you that silence
implies agreement. Heck, a person could be unresponsive to a post
simply because they haven't
Richard, do you know that sometimes I'll receive in my yahoo inbox, a response
to a post BEFORE I receive the original post?! Neo can suck!
I agree that people should defend their friends. Especially against lies. And
especially if friends aren't here to defend themselves. I'm probably less
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote :
On 9/29/2014 9:23 AM, Share Long sharelong60@... mailto:sharelong60@...
[FairfieldLife] wrote:
Buck, I agree with this completely and thank you for making this point.
Richard, I'm sorry but I don't agree with you that silence
/Where I come from, silence usually indicates agreement. When
normal people are having a conversation at a bar and someone tells
a scurrilous lie about your friend and you know it's a lie not
based on any evidence, if you don't speak up and object, then you
might be
17 matches
Mail list logo
