Relative pitch-sensitivity might be like relative moral behavior is in the
illumined as we see it. Relative pitch-sensitivity is probably not
significantly related to the Ved in the Physiology like a philosophy of ethics
might be hoped for in the illumined either. Like grasping at straws.
Many Indians sing the Poja that way, I suppose they are all "tone deaf" ;-)
Well, obviously there is no correlation between spiritual enlightenment and
pitch-sensitivity. Listen to Maharishi sing the puja. He was simply tone deaf.
No wonder he was not a bhajan singing kind of saint. Ours likely would have
been an entirely different spiritual regeneration movement had he
About the same time when I learned TM, bought a Japanese Strat-copy, which
learned
to tune by listening to the interference beat. I guess that's improved my
"ears" quite a lot...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beat_%28acoustics%29#Binaural_beats
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beat_%28acoustics
0,688 is exceptional :-) I did 1,25 which is still very good :-)
May I propose a cordial contest: Adaptive pitch (AP), those who still do TM vs.
those who don't anymore
or never have?
My result for AP was 0,685 Hz...
Whoa! Thot it was the other way round:
How well can you distinguish subtle differences in rhythm?
This test will play a series of two rhythmical phrases and ask you if they are
the same or different. Unlike the similar tonedeaf test, however, the
differences between the phrases are only
