You're out of date, Billy, it's no longer called "Global Warming" nor even "Climate Change". It's now "Climate Disruption." ;-)

And call it what you like, it’s a global phenomenon.

>
On 9/11/2014 1:55 PM, Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife] wrote:
>

Rick, it's not my term. I heard it last year in a radio interview with a climate scientist. They came up with "Climate Change" because people were poo-pooing "Global Warming" when unusually cold weather would occur and they didn't under stand things like the Jet Stream being effected. Then that didn't explain things like seasons coming early or even late so it became "Climate Disruption".

One of the folks I hang out with at the downtown Starbucks worked on the climate project years ago at Lawrence Livermore. He says that the press was always bugging them for a definitive answer. He also likes to say they discovered that one could never tell what a cloud was going to do.

Part of the reason you have "deniers" is they don't want more meddling in their lives and I do believe that some politicians and companies will use the situation for their own profit.

The earth is overpopulated with humans for the infrastructure.
>
So, your solution is to what, honk if you hate noise pollution?

The most densely populated cities are in southern and eastern Asia, though Cairo and Lagos in Africa also fall into this category. Low population densities may cause an extinction vortex and lead to further reduced fertility. Examples of the causes in low population densities include:

 *      Increased problems with locating sexual mates
 *      Increased inbreeding


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Population_density <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Population_density>




>
The infrastructure is in place because it profits big business. We probably need to be living a simpler, cleaner style of living which would be a radical change from what we have today. We are a very wasteful species.

BTW, there is a major solar flare headed our way which will visit earth in the next few days. Might be disruptive, might not.




  • [FairfieldLife]... wgm4u
    • Re: [Fairf... Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife]
      • RE: [F... 'Rick Archer' r...@searchsummit.com [FairfieldLife]
        • Re... Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife]
          • ... 'Richard J. Williams' pundits...@gmail.com [FairfieldLife]
      • Re: [F... 'Richard J. Williams' pundits...@gmail.com [FairfieldLife]
      • Re: [F... danfriedman2002
        • Re... Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
          • ... 'Rick Archer' r...@searchsummit.com [FairfieldLife]
          • ... fleetwood_macnche...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
            • ... danfriedman2002
        • [F... wgm4u
          • ... 'Rick Archer' r...@searchsummit.com [FairfieldLife]
            • ... danfriedman2002

Reply via email to