TurquoiseB wrote:
> The troll might just be lonely, and desperate for
> someone -- anyone -- to react to them and talk to
> them. (I honestly think that's why Richard
> Williams does his trolling.)
>
Now, what exactly were those "two simple questions for
the bhakti supporters"?
From: Uncle Tan
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Giant Snip
Profits must be had even if children drink milk with strontium
> 90, water with MTBE, and, of course, Kool Aid which is about as
> nutritious as Styrofoam.
>
Whoa! Thanks for pouring your energy into this pos
Shemp,
You did make me squirm with shame on at least one issue. But first,
I'll have at you and see if I can make you squirm too.
For starters, I'm not sure Global Warming is due to humans, and I
don't think I've said otherwise, but it sure is a theory that rings
true to me. I will keep reading
Shemp,
You did make me squirm with shame on at least one issue. But first,
I'll have at you and see if I can make you squirm too.
For starters, I'm not sure Global Warming is due to humans, and I
don't think I've said otherwise, but it sure is a theory that rings
true to me. I will keep reading
A good challenge, Edg, and one I'll be interested in
seeing Shemp's reply to.
Here's my "take" on the syndrome, not about Shemp
per se, but about the phenomenon itself. In Net
parlance, it's called trolling. From my mystical
perspective, I call it trolling for attention.
The Net is full of troll
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Shemp,
>
> You've been very LOUD in wanting us all to believe that the Global
> Warming concept is bogus. I've challenged you to give us a
statement
> about the "pollution" aspects of the Global Warming debate, and
y
