Duveyoung:
> Was in the dome from 1981 to 1999.
>
The question is, what did you know, and when did
you know it?
> Long rounded for "five years' worth" of 20-minute
> meditations while on Teacher Training for eight
> months. Kept a record, made graphs!
>
> Always did two hour long programs
> > Your hate here is like "Nazi Memorabilia"...
> >
> > Edg
> >
Jason:
> Barry with his 'intrinsic meanness' is intent
> on hurting others. The motive is definitely
> evil.
>
It seems actually more diabolical than evil. But,
I can't help but note the tone of Ed's message -
jessuss, this g
Was in the dome from 1981 to 1999.
Long rounded for "five years' worth" of 20-minute meditations while on Teacher
Training for eight months. Kept a record, made graphs!
Always did two hour long programs since 1972.
Edg
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "PaliGap" wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung wrote:
> 44,000 hours in the dome. Didn't get fixed.
That sure is a long time Edg.
That's five solid years!
Or, if your prog is, say, 4 hours per day, that's 30 years
attending the dome. Did you do that?
A nought wrong? Or am I arithmetical
Marek,
I've got a storage closet in San Raphael that needs cleaning out. One of these
days, I'll be honking in yer driveway!
Whew on the surfing scare. Dems guts I know not of. I bow.
Edg
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "marekreavis" wrote:
>
> Love you, Edg.
>
> Since you're in Re
Love you, Edg.
Since you're in Retirementville now, why not come back to the 'Boldt for a
visit now and then? I've got a spare bedroom for you and the Missus and I'll
remove all the damp neoprene hanging in the guest bathroom to boot.
Got some big waves this weekend (big in my books, at least)
--- Duveyoung wrote:
>
> X,
>
> Good sobering words.
>
> Barry is all too easy to praise. And that's the rub. Without his vile
> snark, I would say he'd be one of the top five writers that I would read here
> as far as creativity goes. Introduces tons of new concepts to chew on, comes
>
X,
Good sobering words.
Barry is all too easy to praise. And that's the rub. Without his vile snark,
I would say he'd be one of the top five writers that I would read here as far
as creativity goes. Introduces tons of new concepts to chew on, comes up with
nice writerly phrases, seems to be
Stay safe Xeno; I'm all for evacuation.
From: Xenophaneros Anartaxius
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2012 2:59 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: A new theory about how astronomy was used by the
ancients.
You are laying
You are laying it on pretty thick there Robin, as if with a trowel. You might
think of taking up brick laying as a second profession.
And now I must make the choice of staying or leaving this area in the next few
hours and drive all night to a somewhat less dangerous location where the winds
a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung wrote:
> >
> > Turq,
> >
> > You're a mean and cruel son of obviously-abusive parents. AYour parents
> > should be put in prison for the making of you.
> >
> > Your
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung wrote:
>
> Turq,
>
> You're a mean and cruel son of obviously-abusive parents. AYour parents
> should be put in prison for the making of you.
>
> Your mind is aberrant and foul. Your replies to others are almost always
> intent on hurting th
Edg,
You're welcome. These are snippets of Leonard Susskind's new theory. You
should watch his lectures on YouTube. You may find other twists to his ideas
that I may have missed.
JR
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung wrote:
>
> Oooo, thanks JR!
>
> For this: "Similarly,
Oooo, thanks JR!
For this: "Similarly, the universe will be sucked in to the great expanse of
the Big Rip when the expanding velocity of all of the stars and galaxies reach
the speed of light."
I have not tripped over that concept before -- I must digest it!
Edg
--- In FairfieldLife@y
Marek,
Thanks for that book suggestion -- sounds like my cup of tea, except that a cup
of tea is pretty damned silent!
As for that eyesight thingie -- wow!
I wonder if the ancient astrologers had that ability too. I might explain a
mystery to me: namely: that they figured out that Jupiter
Posted it a couple years ago.
Now that I've reposted it, I'm disappointed in the write up. The concept
deserved a better debutante ball.
Edg
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "marekreavis" wrote:
>
> Edg, I don't remember ever seeing this before. When did you post it?
>
> ***
>
> --- In
turquoiseb:
> That said, please carry on for the next two weeks ( or more )
> arguing about who is to blame for things and who is not. Over
> here in Europe, more and more people are starting to look at
> all this as the "rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic" it is.
>
You are so much better tha
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Jason" wrote:
> >
> > Also preserve us from 'people-teasers' who post intimate
> > aspects of their personal lives on a public forum, trying to
> > make a case by treating a 'public forum' as th
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Jason" wrote:
> >
> > Also preserve us from 'people-teasers' who post intimate
> > aspects of their personal lives on a public forum, trying to
> > make a case by treating a 'public forum' as thei
Let's see if we can even count how many negative words or phrases Barry
uses in this little post of his. Sweet gum drop that he is. I will
italicize them.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "marekreavis" reavismarek@
wrote:
> >
> > Ed
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Jason" wrote:
>
> Also preserve us from 'people-teasers' who post intimate
> aspects of their personal lives on a public forum, trying to
> make a case by treating a 'public forum' as their personal
> blog.
Some of us have nothing to hide.
>
> --- "marekreavis" wrote:
> >
> > Edg, I don't remember ever seeing this before. When did you post it?
>
--- turquoiseb wrote:
>
> A Google search reveals that it was posted sometime back
> in 2010. Edg is so petty and so obsessive about his own
> supposed self-importance that he's still f
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "marekreavis" wrote:
>
> Edg, I don't remember ever seeing this before. When did you post it?
A Google search reveals that it was posted sometime back
in 2010. Edg is so petty and so obsessive about his own
supposed self-importance that he's still fuming abou
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung wrote:
>
> Reposting -- cuz no one understood it -- ON PURPOSE.
>
> I just tripped over this post again, and fuck if I didn't get pissed yet
> again at the shits who willfully intended to kill the messenger and ignore
> the concepts being delive
By the way, Edg, it's a good post and a beautiful theory. Have you read "The
Creative Explosion: An Inquiry into the Origins of Art and Religion" by John
Pfeiffer? He has a fascinating theory re the great cave art of Lascaux, Alta
Mira, and the others.
And I remember reading recently about Afri
Edg, I don't remember ever seeing this before. When did you post it?
***
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung wrote:
>
> Reposting -- cuz no one understood it -- ON PURPOSE.
>
> I just tripped over this post again, and fuck if I didn't get pissed yet
> again at the shits who willful
Duveyoung:
> I have been bashed, besmirched and berated...
>
Maybe I should be upset since I posted over 5,000
messages to Usenet about yoga and meditation and
hardly anyone posted a reply, except to bash,
besmirch, and berate. Why don't they just shoot us,
Ed? Go figure.
> Yep, I'm going wi
--- Duveyoung wrote:
>
> Turq,
>
> You're a mean and cruel son of obviously-abusive parents. AYour parents
> should be put in prison for the making of you.
>
> Your mind is aberrant and foul. Your replies to others are almost always
> intent on hurting the tender feeling level -- there
Turq,
You're a mean and cruel son of obviously-abusive parents. AYour parents should
be put in prison for the making of you.
Your mind is aberrant and foul. Your replies to others are almost always
intent on hurting the tender feeling level -- therefore: evil by even a mundane
and non-spi
Carl Sagan in his book 'Cosmos' says that mankind wanted to
identify with the 'permanence' of the sky above. He points
out that the national flags of most countries have either
the stars or moon or sun.
No doubt it's the most ancient "science" if one can us the
term. It eventualy led to mod
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung wrote:
>
> Reposting -- cuz no one understood it -- ON PURPOSE.
I suspect you're just having an "It's all about me" moment, Edg.
Speaking for myself, 1) I have no memory of ever having seen it
before, and 2) I would have clicked Next the instant
> >
> > We city dwellers don't know the night sky, do we? And our astronomers are
> > all busy looking beyond the human eye's ability, so who looks at the skies
> > now with any hint of a personal relationship?
> >
> > To me, the astrologers who would read about our lives in our astrologica
> > From what I've heard Sanjay's group broke apart
> > due to money dispute. I tried to get some info
> > from one of the organizers...
> >
TurquoiseB:
> So you're saying that all these Jyotishi, who you
> are presenting as somewhat advanced, and yourself
> cool because you shared a little of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "John" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
> > >
> > > John wrote:
> > > > Yeah, I met these guys when I was living in Seattle up
> > > > until 2004. It was in 1
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "John" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
> >
> > John wrote:
> > > Yeah, I met these guys when I was living in Seattle up
> > > until 2004. It was in 1994 that I started learning jyotish.
> > > One of the students in our cla
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
>
> John wrote:
> > Yeah, I met these guys when I was living in Seattle up until 2004. It was
> > in 1994 that I started learning jyotish. One of the students in our class
> > was the wife of the governor of Washington state. Our teacher
John wrote:
> Yeah, I met these guys when I was living in Seattle up until 2004. It was in
> 1994 that I started learning jyotish. One of the students in our class was
> the wife of the governor of Washington state. Our teacher was Brendan Feeley
> who had since moved to the nation's capital.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
>
> WillyTex wrote:
> > Duveyoung:
> >
> >> He made a statement that he cannot back up...
> >>
> >>
> > Apparently you don't get it Edg - nobody wants to
> > discuss Astrology with you because you and Barry
> > are not Astrologers, i
Okay, so I cannot do the math of an astronomer, I don't care, cuz this isn't
about modern astronomy's math, it's about the non-mathematical action of
book-marking a memory by using the stars' positions.
What I do care about, line on stone, is that you acted like an asshole and
remain unapologet
Okay, since you know a ton about astronomy can you tell us how to
calculate an planet's orbit? What terms and methods are available? How
do you implement reading Chebyshev polynomials in software that can be
read from the JPL ephemeris. Now no fair cheating and looking this
stuff up because
So fucking what? I'm talking about something quite different than any recent
recorded relationships between astronomy and astrology.
You are the one missing the point.
And I know a ton about astronomy and the history of it including Kepler et al
and how they futzed around with astrology.
Astrology uses astronomy, Edg. Apparently you didn't get my point about
many early astronomers, of whom Kepler was only one, made their living
by preparing charts for astrologers. A serious astrologer knows some
astronomy too.
Duveyoung wrote:
> I'm talking about the opposite of astrology.
>
>
WillyTex wrote:
> Duveyoung:
>
>> He made a statement that he cannot back up...
>>
>>
> Apparently you don't get it Edg - nobody wants to
> discuss Astrology with you because you and Barry
> are not Astrologers, in fact you are both flamers.
>
> Get some smarts - if you can't find somethi
I'm talking about the opposite of astrology.
Edg
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "WillyTex" wrote:
>
>
>
> Duveyoung:
> > He made a statement that he cannot back up...
> >
> Apparently you don't get it Edg - nobody wants to
> discuss Astrology with you because you and Barry
> are not As
Duveyoung:
> He made a statement that he cannot back up...
>
Apparently you don't get it Edg - nobody wants to
discuss Astrology with you because you and Barry
are not Astrologers, in fact you are both flamers.
Get some smarts - if you can't find something common
to discuss, just keep your pi
Judy,
Hmmm, seems to me I deconstructed his post, and you are purposefully ignoring
the issues I illustrated.
In fact, you're being downright Barryesque in that you snip off many of my
comments -- seemingly because I scored points with them -- and that just
wouldn't do now would it?
He made a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung wrote:
>
> Judy,
>
> Here's Bhairitu's words:
>
> Don't bother copyrighting as the subject has been tackled
> by many authors.
>
> The use of the word, "subject," indicates that he knows
> what the subject is: caveman night sky diary.
No, the "s
Judy,
Here's Bhairitu's words:
Don't bother copyrighting as the subject has been tackled by many
authors.
The use of the word, "subject," indicates that he knows what the subject
is: caveman night sky diary. He asserts confidently ("many') that the
subject has not only been, say, "mentioned bef
> > That's correct but he doesn't seem to get it.
> >
Duveyoung:
> I'd say you've flat out been caught red-handed
> as a bullshitter...
>
It is a fact needing no further proof that the first
sight of another person's face can determine the
outcome of an entire day.
However, we should all pa
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung wrote:
>
> Bhairitu -- I'd say you've flat out been caught red-handed
> as a bullshitter. You put down my "caveman night sky
> diary" idea as trite and then cannot back up your play. I
> maintain the idea is unique.
Edg. You aren't paying attentio
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung wrote:
> >
> > Bhairitu -- I'd say you've flat out been caught red-handed as
> > a bullshitter. You put down my "caveman night sky diary" idea
> > as trite...
>
> What? No harsh words
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung wrote:
>
> Bhairitu -- I'd say you've flat out been caught red-handed as
> a bullshitter. You put down my "caveman night sky diary" idea
> as trite...
What? No harsh words for me? :-)
I dismissed your "essay" as trite without even
reading it.
Bhairitu -- I'd say you've flat out been caught red-handed as a bullshitter.
You put down my "caveman night sky diary" idea as trite and then cannot back up
your play. I maintain the idea is unique.
Edg
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
>
> That's correct but he doesn't s
That's correct but he doesn't seem to get it.
authfriend wrote:
> Edg, I think he's saying that lots of people have had lots
> of different ideas about how the ancients used astronomy.
> He doesn't think you should bother to copyright yours
> because nobody's going to want to steal it; they'll com
I'm not worried about anyone taking the idea and getting a PhD in it and
becoming famous in the Paleolithic world -- just wanted to date the idea's
birth in my nervous system and, hey, if I got lucky and was the first to come
up with the notion, then, yeah, I'll take a brief bow for 15 SECONDS o
Edg, I think he's saying that lots of people have had lots
of different ideas about how the ancients used astronomy.
He doesn't think you should bother to copyright yours
because nobody's going to want to steal it; they'll come up
with their own idea instead--i.e., they're a dime a dozen.
(Right, B
Still non-responsive. Give a link. I googled it and found nothing -- pony up
-- if you can't then your several responses that showed such certainty that the
idea was well-worn must be bullshit. Keyword: diary. Read my essay -- sounds
like a scanning didn't do it for you.
Edg
--- In Fairfie
Chill out. I was not beating up on you. Just pointing out there have
been plenty of such ideas already written about. I scanned your article
and got the gist of it. Now go make some pitta tea and chill out. ;-)
Duveyoung wrote:
> Did you or did you not read my entire essay? You are being
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung wrote:
>
> Did you or did you not read my entire essay?
I don't know about Bhairitu, but I can state for
a fact that I read no more of it than the first
sentence or so that appeared in Message View. The
fact that *you* were proud enough of it to c
Did you or did you not read my entire essay? You are being non-responsive
about the "diary" idea. Did you actually come across this concept before?
Edg
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
>
> No, I did as an example of astrological theory.
>
> Duveyoung wrote:
> > Sunspots?
No, I did as an example of astrological theory.
Duveyoung wrote:
> Sunspots? -- I never mentioned sunspots.
>
> Edg
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
>
>> I was speaking about the concept. The article on the sunspots was in
>> the Mountain Astrologer probably over a
Sunspots? -- I never mentioned sunspots.
Edg
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
>
> I was speaking about the concept. The article on the sunspots was in
> the Mountain Astrologer probably over a decade ago.
>
> Duveyoung wrote:
> > Perhaps you could share a link with me?
I was speaking about the concept. The article on the sunspots was in
the Mountain Astrologer probably over a decade ago.
Duveyoung wrote:
> Perhaps you could share a link with me? I don't think I've come across
> anyone every saying what I'm saying below -- the concept of "the night sky
> bei
Perhaps you could share a link with me? I don't think I've come across anyone
every saying what I'm saying below -- the concept of "the night sky being a
personal diary."
Edg
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
>
> Don't bother copyrighting as the subject has been tackled by
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung wrote:
>
> I like the following idea so much I'm copyrighting this piece. I haven't
> been all that scholarly, but I'm convinced I'm being original and that the
> below is a new idea. Er, I hope.
>
> Copyright Edg Duveyoung 2010
>
> One fac
65 matches
Mail list logo
