--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, brian64705 no_re...@... wrote:
Judy, If by reputable you mean main stream media, I have
to disagree when it comes to investigations of very powerful
vested interests.
No, the phrase I used was reputable news sources. That
could be the MSM in some cases;
Your first problem was pointing to the tacky looking WorldReports
website put together by eccentric right leaning individuals. Would have
been better to post the original source material which are more
difficult to for the curmudgeons here to refute. Even some on the left
have tacky looking
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozg...@... wrote:
Your first problem was pointing to the tacky looking
WorldReports website put together by eccentric right
leaning individuals. Would have been better to post
the original source material which are more difficult
to for the
Judy, but all the sources you review here are MSM. Care to extend your review
to alternative media sites you like? It seems the online/alternative media is
having a huge impact on the MSM print and broadcast media. With the alternative
media acting as a watchdog and competitor they cannot
authfriend wrote:
snip
When I find such items on web pages I know will bring
hackles from the peanut gallery about the messenger
the solution is often a click away at the top of the
article which contains a link to the original.
That's what *I* suggested to Brian, that he cite
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, brian64705 no_re...@... wrote:
Judy, but all the sources you review here are MSM. Care to
extend your review to alternative media sites you like?
Sure. Slate.com and Salon.com are both pretty good, but
you have to get familiar with the individual writers,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozg...@... wrote:
authfriend wrote:
snip
When I find such items on web pages I know will bring
hackles from the peanut gallery about the messenger
the solution is often a click away at the top of the
article which contains a link
authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozg...@... wrote:
authfriend wrote:
snip
When I find such items on web pages I know will bring
hackles from the peanut gallery about the messenger
the solution is often a click away at the top of the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, brian64705 no_re...@... wrote:
This is interesting. A report from Bloomberg with comments
added from Christopher Story of WorldReports.org
Brian, you do know Christopher Story is a crackpot, right?
He just makes stuff up. Look at this page:
The Bloomberg story is published here:
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-06-29/banks-financing-mexico-s-drug-cartels-admitted-in-wells-fargo-s-u-s-deal.html
I've been reading Christopher Story for about 4 years. So yes sometimes he gets
it wrong, but when we see the main stream starting to
Judy, clearly this guy Brian believes whatever happens to land in his e-mail
in-box.
I get crap like this almost every day from my right wing nut friends. Almost
invariably a simple check of snopes.com would save them the embarrassment of
sending this garbage out. But no, that would mean
Hmm - more ad hominems!
In this case Christopher Story is merely reposting a story from Bloomberg news
with a few comments. Have a look at the video of the former Money Laundering
unit of Wachovia interviewed on the left here at
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Joe geezerfr...@... wrote:
Judy, clearly this guy Brian believes whatever happens to
land in his e-mail in-box.
Yeah, I'm afraid you're right.
I am rather fond of the image of George W. Bush waking
up to find a horse's head in his bed a la The Godfather,
I'm not disputing that Wachovia is evil, Brian. I'm saying
you should be reading reputable news sources rather than
Story.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, brian64705 no_re...@... wrote:
Hmm - more ad hominems!
In this case Christopher Story is merely reposting a story from Bloomberg
Judy, If by reputable you mean main stream media, I have to disagree when it
comes to investigations of very powerful vested interests.
But what I find heartening in this story is indeed now we seem to be seeing
more truth in main stream outlets such as Bloomberg. And I am seeing it in Fox
15 matches
Mail list logo
