[[1. All what is that? 2. All this is what?
and Nelson wrote [[And whose on third? [snip] relativly irrelevant
to me.]]
** its all tit for tat!
om ta-da!..
rudrani
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, rudrani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[[1. All what is that? 2. All this is what?
and Nelson wrote [[And whose on third? [snip] relativly irrelevant
to me.]]
** its all tit for tat!
om ta-da!..
rudrani
+ This theory was disproved many years
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, rudra_joe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually the difference is practical only for the mind at first when
one is on the path. Because at that point one can immerse the mind in
samadhi and yet when returning to the daily life nothing has changed
and one keeps
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Nelson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
In 3 or 4 sentances, whats the difference in the concepts?
Anyone?
+ All this is that- get a handle on it. N.
1. All what is
