--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" wrote:
>
> The thing is, Edg, I did NOT post sexually explicit material.
>
> I posted a link to VERY sexually explicit material, none of which appeared on
> this forum.
>
> And I was trying to make a point...perhaps one that Alex doesn't agree
The thing is, Edg, I did NOT post sexually explicit material.
I posted a link to VERY sexually explicit material, none of which appeared on
this forum.
And I was trying to make a point...perhaps one that Alex doesn't agree with and
perhaps that is why he has misrepresented me here.
But I have
Alex,
I don't get posts via email, so I don't know what Shemp posted, but what about
my piece a couple weeks ago in which I wrote up a "hot session" as my
"satirically" gratuitous interpretation of someone's post of scriptural
love-poetry?
I may not have peppered that piece with the accouter
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" wrote:
[snip]
Posting sexually explicit content is against the rules, and it's probably the
most strictly enforced rule we have. I'm going to delete that post. Please
refrain from posting that kind of material in the future.
