[FairfieldLife] Re: Celibacy and kaivalya??

2014-06-03 Thread cardemais...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
puruSa ({pU3ruSa}) m. man, human being, male, person, individual of a cert. generation; man=hero; man=servant, attendant; official, agent; the primal man or spirit; the life-giving principle in man and other beings; the supreme spirit or soul of the universe. --f. {puruSI3} a woman. According

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Celibacy and kaivalya??

2014-06-03 Thread Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
emptybill, Brahman says, My indestructible Maya! Does He weep weep weep? And is this similar to the Christian concept of oh happy fall? (Because without the fall of Adam and Eve, we wouldn't have had Christ's birth, etc.) On Tuesday, June 3, 2014 4:12 AM, emptyb...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Celibacy and kaivalya??

2014-06-03 Thread 'Richard J. Williams' pundits...@gmail.com [FairfieldLife]
On 6/3/2014 2:51 AM, cardemais...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote: *puruSa* ({pU3ruSa}) m. man, human being, male, person, individual of a cert. generation; man=hero; man=servant, attendant; official, agent; the primal man or spirit; the life-giving principle in man and other beings; the

[FairfieldLife] Re: Celibacy and kaivalya??

2014-06-02 Thread cardemais...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
I think that separation, or whatever, of puruSa and prakRti might well be the very reason for Baadaraayana's statement in the brahma-suutras: etena yogaH pratyuktaH : by this [argument in the previous suutra] yoga [also] is refuted (prati-ukta: counter-spoken?).

[FairfieldLife] Re: Celibacy and kaivalya??

2014-06-02 Thread emptyb...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
In the Yoga Sutra-s, Patanjali clearly demarcates two equal realities. Purusha and Prakrti are natively separate and don't require more separation to clarify them. They are inherently unmixed and eternally unmixable. Ashtanga yoga is the practice designed to foster viyoga - cognitive

[FairfieldLife] Re: Celibacy and kaivalya??

2014-06-02 Thread cardemais...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
Maharishi on Union (yoga) vs. disunion (viyoga): Photo 1 - 2014-06-02 https://www.flickr.com/photos/66867356@N02/14145317739/ https://www.flickr.com/photos/66867356@N02/14145317739/ Photo 1 - 2014-06-02 https://www.flickr.com/photos/66867356@N02/14145317739/ Explore flickpulli's

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Celibacy and kaivalya??

2014-06-02 Thread 'Richard J. Williams' pundits...@gmail.com [FairfieldLife]
On 6/2/2014 3:03 PM, cardemais...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote: Maharishi on Union (yoga) vs. disunion (viyoga): I've often wondered why MMY chose the Bhagavad Gita to explain his spiritual system, rather than Patanjali's Yoga Sutras. So far as I know, TMers don't recite the Gita in

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Celibacy and kaivalya??

2014-06-02 Thread 'Richard J. Williams' pundits...@gmail.com [FairfieldLife]
On 6/2/2014 11:59 AM, emptyb...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote: In the Yoga Sutra-s, Patanjali clearly demarcates two equal realities. Purusha and Prakrti are natively separate and don't require more separation to clarify them. They are inherently unmixed and eternally unmixable. Ashtanga

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Celibacy and kaivalya??

2014-06-02 Thread 'Richard J. Williams' pundits...@gmail.com [FairfieldLife]
On 6/2/2014 9:46 AM, cardemais...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote: I think that separation, or whatever, of puruSa and prakRti might well be the very reason for Baadaraayana's statement in the brahma-suutras: etena yogaH pratyuktaH : by this [argument in the previous suutra] yoga [also] is