--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any psychologist that says, over a period of
weeks:
1) I have state sanction to declare you crazy
2) I have state sanction to commit crazy people
3) You are crazy
You take these comments completely
On Sep 6, 2007, at 9:36 AM, Peter wrote:
but when the poster explains the intent
of the post you'd think the misunderstanding would
simmer down. The fact that it doesn't means, to me,
that both of you want to demonize me and this is a
justification to continue this position.
This is an old
On Sep 6, 2007, at 10:14 AM, Vaj wrote:
If others want to exercise their delusions online, that's their
problem.
Sorry should've read: If others want to exercise their delusions or
obsessions online, that's their problem.
Peter, the more you try to excuse yourself, the
deeper you dig the hole you're in.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
You and Judy appear to
have a vested interest in keeping this abuse issue
going because when I attempt to place my comments to
Richard
New.Morning, it didn't get me worked up because of the context in
which it appeared -- an online forum -- and because of the history of
the two individuals, Peter and Richard, as I've come to know them on
FFL. A different configuration could easily prompt a different reply.
I think you hit the
Judy wrote:
Even if it didn't shake his own confidence
in his sanity, how would he have felt knowing
a practicing clinical psychologist had
announced--to all appearances, quite
seriously
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/148391
Never heard of a psychologist prescribing
--- Richard J. Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Judy wrote:
Even if it didn't shake his own confidence
in his sanity, how would he have felt knowing
a practicing clinical psychologist had
announced--to all appearances, quite
seriously
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning
no_reply@ wrote:
It's your projection of abuse of power.
Thats a possibility. I well reflect on that.
Can you accept that, that perhaps is not the case?
You are the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
New.Morning, it didn't get me worked up because of the context in
which it appeared -- an online forum -- and because of the history of
the two individuals, Peter and Richard, as I've come to know them on
FFL. A
New.Morning, it didn't get me worked up because of the context in
which it appeared -- an online forum -- and because of the history of
the two individuals, Peter and Richard, as I've come to know them on
FFL. A different configuration could easily prompt a different reply.
**
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Marek Reavis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
New.Morning, it didn't get me worked up because of the context in
which it appeared -- an online forum -- and because of the history of
the two individuals, Peter and Richard, as I've come to know them on
FFL. A
11 matches
Mail list logo
