--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Buck wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Buck wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, zarzari_786 no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Buck wrote:
Interesting though. Sitting around
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Buck wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, zarzari_786 no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Buck wrote:
Interesting though. Sitting around recently with adept people who work
with and can see people's energy
On Dec 20, 2011, at 8:32 PM, Buck wrote:
Interesting though. Sitting around recently with adept people who work with
and can see people's energy fields comparatively, the comment was that the
Ravi Shankar AOL kriya people tend to have coarser chakra systems from the
rawer
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Buck dhamiltony2k5@... wrote:
Interesting though. Sitting around recently with adept people who work with
and can see people's energy fields comparatively, the comment was that the
Ravi Shankar AOL kriya people tend to have coarser chakra systems from
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, zarzari_786 no_reply@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Buck wrote:
Interesting though. Sitting around recently with adept people who work
with and can see people's energy fields comparatively, the comment was that
the Ravi
wgm,Good video clip. I admire you took this bull by the horns and did this
Youtube clip. It's a good attempt at teaching in a way the TM movement can't
now.
I do very much remember Maharishi lecturing in detail about this on my TM
teacher training course (1973). Then at some point in the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Buck dhamiltony2k5@... wrote:
wgm,Good video clip. I admire you took this bull by the horns and did this
Youtube clip. It's a good attempt at teaching in a way the TM movement can't
now.
I do very much remember Maharishi lecturing in detail
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wgm4u anitaoaks4u@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Buck wrote:
wgm,Good video clip. I admire you took this bull by the horns and did this
Youtube clip. It's a good attempt at teaching in a way the TM movement
can't now.
To be truthful, the same thing could happen with Transcendental Meditation in
the wrong physiology or unsupervised.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shukra69 shukra69@... wrote:
http://www.jcrows.com/trogawa_mentaldisorders.html
Meditation practitioners of tummo4 should know that they
TM does not involve strenuous pranayama or the direct manipulation of the
chakras and does NOT carry the same dangers.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Buck dhamiltony2k5@... wrote:
To be truthful, the same thing could happen with Transcendental Meditation in
the wrong physiology or
Interesting though. Sitting around recently with adept people who work with
and can see people's energy fields comparatively, the comment was that the Ravi
Shankar AOL kriya people tend to have coarser chakra systems from the rawer
kundalini that their pranayams give. The SRF (Yogananda) have
Maybe TM'ers don't need chakras, anyway there is NO teaching vis-a-vis the
chakras in the TM lexicon, therefore they don't exist. Certainly MMY would have
told us about them, yes?
Does the TMorg even believe there are such things as *chakras*?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Buck
On Dec 20, 2011, at 8:32 PM, Buck wrote:
Interesting though. Sitting around recently with adept people who work with
and can see people's energy fields comparatively, the comment was that the
Ravi Shankar AOL kriya people tend to have coarser chakra systems from the
rawer kundalini that
On Dec 20, 2011, at 8:40 PM, wgm4u wrote:
Maybe TM'ers don't need chakras, anyway there is NO teaching vis-a-vis the
chakras in the TM lexicon, therefore they don't exist. Certainly MMY would
have told us about them, yes?
He did give out the Om-based mantras of the seven lokas dude
It doesn't have to. TM is a gentle enough technique, that by the time chakras
are recognized by the TMer, its game over - might seem flashy but no big deal -
doesn't have a disruptive effect. TMSP, different story.:-)
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wgm4u anitaoaks4u@... wrote:
Maybe
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, whynotnow7 whynotnow7@... wrote:
It doesn't have to. TM is a gentle enough technique, that by the time chakras
are recognized by the TMer, its game over - might seem flashy but no big deal
- doesn't have a disruptive effect. TMSP, different story.:-)
On Dec 20, 2011, at 9:27 PM, wgm4u wrote:
I don't recall MMY ever making such a comment, even remotely...face it, MMY
left this out of his lexicon because it is too esoteric for the general
public, therefore NOBODY gets to learn about it!!
Robin will probably - if he dare be honest; and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wgm4u anitaoaks4u@... wrote:
Maybe TM'ers don't need chakras, anyway there is NO teaching vis-a-vis the
chakras in the TM lexicon, therefore they don't exist. Certainly MMY would
have told us about them, yes?
Does the TMorg even believe there are
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of Buck
Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2011 10:03 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Dangers of Tibetan meditation practices
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
19 matches
Mail list logo
