John,
My reply was to accept your bilateral posting halt.
The responses generated to the deserving few are the measure of
karma, no less no more.
I enjoy the diversity that life offers, and I guess this is part of
That.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "John M. Knapp, LMSW"
<[EMAIL PROT
No, Dan,
Read my message again. I offered to stop posting you if you agreed to stop
attacking me.
You haven't indicated if you will accept that deal or not, so I don't see how I
am solely
bound by it.
You haven't answered my questions about whether you enjoy inflicting pain or
not.
J.
---
John,
And you just agreed to stop posting me. Where's your self-control?
Need counseling?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "John M. Knapp, LMSW"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "danfriedman2002"
wrote:
> >
> > for the newbee who brought the message c
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "danfriedman2002" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> for the newbee who brought the message count up to 1,000 in the last 7
> days?
>
I think you grossly overestimate your power.
Very few people have responded to you.
I think the rise in correspondence here h
