---Rick no doubt reasonable people can sometimes argue about what is
ethical behavior but I think in the case of the teachers I refered to
below I have no doubt that most people would agree that they behaved
unethically because by any reasonable standard they did. eg taking
advantage of their
Ethics is an ever-changing series of
personal decisions based on a
seemingly infinite mixture of, (but certainly not
limited to),
conscience, internalized beliefs, religious
affiliation, genetics,
family values, peer influence, culture, gender,
conformity,
groupthink, personal
Some say we choose the karma for each of our lives.
I suppose this includes 'wives' choosing to be killed by their
'husbands' - a choice I understand one makes in in a non-corporeal form.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mark robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I suspect the motive of
On Mar 31, 2005, at 1:26 AM, Bob Brigante wrote:
Maharishi says that Behavior is a spontaneous expression of one's
level of consciousness, so that only unlimited awareness would be an
always-right and reliable basis for behavior.
Then what would one conclude about the unethical behavior of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, George DeForest
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
.
Vaj writes:
How come MMY doesn't talk ethics?
my guess at maharishi's thinking:
(please dont shoot the messenger!)
without regular transcending, all
attempts at ethical consideration
is only
---Not to defend MMY's unethical behavior(because I believe that he
has behaved that way)I think that it's worth mentioning that numerous
other ostensibly enlightened beings have behaved unethically including
several prominent buddhist teachers.All of which leads me to conclude
that maybe we
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, George DeForest
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
.
Vaj writes:
How come MMY doesn't talk ethics?
my guess at maharishi's thinking:
(please dont shoot the messenger!)
without regular transcending, all
attempts at ethical consideration
is only
