Well, I think the women on this forum are strong women and it would be rare 
that they would succumb to abuse.

As far as Barry, I don't view him as an abuser. But he comes across as a 
hypocrite, from my interactions with him on this forum and from the bit I've 
read, But maybe that is just his 2-D life here on FFL and his 3-D life is much 
different. But then, that too would be hypocritical; ie: one thing in 2-D and 
another in 3-D.

**********

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Richard J. Williams" <richard@...> wrote:
>
> 
> 
> Carol:
> > Yet, I too see your hypocrisy on this board...
> >
> So, it looks like you're thinking that Barry has
> been abusing some of the women on this list? Where 
> would Barry have learned this behavior? Go figure.
> 
>  
> > > > These kind of sexual relationships are a bit of a gray area. 
> > > >  How much interest you should show in other people's private 
> > > > lives is a matter of debate.
> > > > 
> > > > As Barry pointed out, 'Groupie with standards', the 
> > > > phenomenon exists in all fields and 'all walks of life'. In 
> > > > business, in sports, in the movie industry and so on.
> > > > 
> > > > Many young women use these guys as fodder for their growth 
> > > > and move on.  These women were adults and they knew what 
> > > > they were doing.  They are groupies voluntarily and to 
> > > > pretend that it's an one-sided affair is not accurate.
> > > 
> > > You mistook my intent in saying what I said. Of course
> > > there is an element of groupie behavior in women falling
> > > onto their backs for people in positions of power or
> > > celebrity. That certainly happens. 
> > > 
> > > But there is ALSO behavior in which the people IN these
> > > positions of power or celebrity ABUSE their positions,
> > > and make use of them to get their rocks off with these
> > > gullible and stupid women. The TM organization was rife
> > > with this kind of "abuse of position." In Europe I saw
> > > dozens of guys on International Staff who specialized
> > > in "seducing the course participants," all while claim-
> > > ing to be celibate themselves. They would come on to
> > > some naive TMer or TM teacher and say things like "I
> > > know that I should be celibate, but I'm just SO attracted
> > > to you." Then they'd fuck them a few times and forget
> > > them, and run the same number on someone else the next
> > > month, or the next week. When called on this behavior,
> > > many of them would claim not to even be able to 
> > > remember having done the same thing the week or month
> > > before. It was *accepted* behavior, and as we all know
> > > now, modeled on the mindset of their teacher Maharishi,
> > > who did exactly the same thing. 
> > > 
> > > There IS such a thing as a "power differential" in real
> > > life. Like the one that bosses have over their secre-
> > > taries when they badger them into having sex with them.
> > > Like the one that therapists have with their vulnerable
> > > patients. Like the one that teachers in schools have
> > > with their students. Abuse these levels of trust and
> > > responsibility in those organizations and you'll get
> > > your ass fired or lose your license or go to prison. 
> > > 
> > > But when it happens in "spiritual" organizations, this
> > > same abuse of inherent "power differentials" and abuse
> > > of trust is largely ignored, and thus quietly sanctioned.
> > > People see it and then look the other way, to avoid 
> > > dealing with the cognitive dissonance of people they
> > > assumed to be trustworthy proving themselves less than
> > > trustworthy. They pretend it never happened, because
> > > hypocrisy is easier to live with than the knowledge
> > > that their assumptions about these people in power are
> > > and have always been false. 
> > > 
> > > And worse, if someone dares to cry, "The Emperor has
> > > no clothes, and in fact is waving his dick at every
> > > woman in town" the way Edg just did, the True Believers
> > > gang up on him and try to make *him* the Bad Guy. 
> > > 
> > > I think it sucks. I lived with such hypocrisy in the
> > > Rama trip, and will never do so again. I saw him fuck
> > > his way through dozens of women, taking advantage of
> > > their naivete and their adoration. I saw him ruin some
> > > of these women's lives, get them pregnant and then
> > > demand that they get abortions, and then dump them as
> > > soon as he was "finished with them." I knew many of
> > > these women personally, and provided a shoulder for
> > > them to cry on after being made to feel like a Kleenex
> > > that he'd jacked off into. 
> > > 
> > > That's WRONG. That an ABUSE OF TRUST. That's inexcusable.
> > > 
> > > Trying to excuse it by saying that these women are/were 
> > > adults and thus "knew what they were doing" just doesn't
> > > cut it. The incredible sway that spiritual teachers have
> > > over their students is never to be forgotten. Many of
> > > these women considered Rama almost as a God, and he
> > > encouraged them to think that way. Many of the TM women
> > > probably had their own reasons for bedding Hagelin (to
> > > "get close" to someone who was "close" with Maharishi,
> > > and thus possibly pick up some "darshan cooties") or
> > > Maharishi himself (*direct* "darshan cooties"). But
> > > it was still the teachers or the people in power who
> > > took advantage of these women's naivete and their
> > > innocence to fuck them and then throw them away. 
> > > 
> > > Do NOT try to make me a party in condoning this kind 
> > > of behavior in a spiritual setting, or in any other. 
> > > I once got fired from a job for counseling a woman
> > > who had been the victim of sexual abuse by the CFO
> > > of the company what to do to protect herself. He was
> > > a serial abuser, and *everyone* in the company knew
> > > it and kept quiet about it. I gave her a tape recorder 
> > > and told her to record his next demands to "Stay late 
> > > and work" (meaning "Stay and suck my cock"), and she 
> > > did it. The CFO got fired, the resulting lawsuit cost 
> > > the company hundreds of thousands of dollars, and I 
> > > got fired for having suggested it. I considered my
> > > actions a success. 
> > > 
> > > Power -- real or only perceived -- comes with 
> > > RESPONSIBILITY. You just don't abuse that responsi-
> > > bility, and abuse those you're responsible TO. Don't
> > > you DARE try to make excuses for Hagelin or Bevan
> > > or any of the others taking advantage of their
> > > perceived positions of power to fuck women who 
> > > wouldn't have given them a second look if they
> > > didn't hold those positions of power. Naive or
> > > not, they didn't deserve to be treated the way
> > > they were treated.
>

Reply via email to