--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Stu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Harris, Dawkins, and Hitchens all make arguments about the absurdity
of the label atheist. The only place I have seen the word used was
by religious people as a pejorative. This writer was clearly
reacting against these
stu writes snipped:
In all cases, free will is adopted and rejected by people regardless of
their proclivity towards faith. However, I am ever suspicious of
anyone's arguments if they involve themselves with faith. If they are
willing to accept one notion without adequate evidence what then of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Stu buttsplicer@ wrote:
Harris, Dawkins, and Hitchens all make arguments about the
absurdity of the label atheist. The only place I have seen
the word used was by religious
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
stu writes snipped:
In all cases, free will is adopted and rejected by people regardless
of
their proclivity towards faith. However, I am ever suspicious of
anyone's arguments if they involve
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Stu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlist@ wrote:
stu writes snipped:
In all cases, free will is adopted and rejected by people
regardless
of
their
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Whether or not there is free will depends not on
belief but on state of consciousness,
I'd say what depends on state of consciousness
is not whether there is or is not free will, but
whether the existence or
Are you in brahman? If not, how would you know what's
real or not real in that state or states beyond?
--- authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela
Mailander
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Whether or not there is free will depends not on
belief but
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you in brahman? If not, how would you know what's
real or not real in that state or states beyond?
Where exactly did I suggest I knew, Angela?
--- authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander
mailander111@ wrote:
Whether or not there is free will depends not on
belief but on state of consciousness,
I'd say what depends on state of consciousness
Buttsplicer, this is fuccing brilliant--in my opinion,
a phrase they add tirelessly to any statement of such
in China and with mantra-like efficiency--speaking of
techniques that work.
Now, to my mind, there is freedom of choice, if you're
willing to grant the mathematical and logical
certainty
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Stu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The concept of free will in a metaphysical
sense is unprovable. The question of determinism versus
free will turns on circular logic.
Exactly.
snip
As for the polemic on atheism - I reject the notion of atheism
altogether.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Stu buttsplicer@ wrote:
snip
Stu, did you *read* what was in the post? The writer
is addressing people *who call themselves atheists*.
And he doesn't appear to be a religionist
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Stu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Stu buttsplicer@ wrote:
snip
Stu, did you *read* what was in the post? The writer
is addressing people *who call
Buttsplicer, once again I bow to your ass.
--- Stu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Stu
buttsplicer@ wrote:
snip
Stu, did you *read* what was in the post? The
writer
is
14 matches
Mail list logo
