seventhray1 wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "WillyTex" wrote:
>
>
>> Right, 'Bhairitu', you're posting under a
>> pseudonym, but I'm the one that is scared.
>>
>>
> Point, Willytex
>
>
Nothing wrong with using handles and probably wise when it comes to FFL.
Steve,
When a specter takes amphetamine, it feels powerful and struts around
like a rakshasa. When a specter takes an entheogen, it feels godlike and
commanding. It acts like an asura, determined to interject anywhere.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1"
wrote:
>
> Joe, now I do
Richard, have you seen those master fisherman with a line with multiple hooks
and a fish on each onecan I get an amen on that?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "WillyTex" wrote:
>
>
>
> > > > Oh well, at least you have Seroquel.
> > > >
> > > Can you send me one o
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "WillyTex" wrote:
> I've posted over 6,000 messages since 1998 on
> Google Groups and Yahoo! Groups in order to
> help people, but it has been really slow
> going lately, except for Joe - he really wants
> some help, apparently. Get it out Joe!
Richard, s
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "WillyTex" wrote:
>
>
>
> > > > Oh well, at least you have Seroquel.
> > > >
> > > Can you send me one of yours?
> > >
> azgrey:
> > Boy, you *are* a Texan aren't you?
> >
> See, Ray, it works almost every time!
>
and yet he does post under his real identity, or at least everyone knows
who he is.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Joe" wrote:
>
>
> ...and that electricity-less hut in the country.
>
> A nut in his hut.
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, azgrey no_reply@ wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > -
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "WillyTex" wrote:
> Right, 'Bhairitu', you're posting under a
> pseudonym, but I'm the one that is scared.
>
Point, Willytex
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tartbrain wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "WillyTex" willytex@ wrote:
> > It's our way of providing the opportunity
> > for others to work off their karma by
> > saying things about us and making fun of
> > our spiritual path - it's a cleansing
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Joe" wrote:
>
> You live in a cemetery?
>
Hilarious! Good one, Joe.
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "WillyTex" wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > > It must get really lonely being you Willy.
> > > >
> > Joe:
> > > A nut in his hut.
> > >
> > Thanks
You live in a cemetery?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "WillyTex" wrote:
>
>
>
> > > It must get really lonely being you Willy.
> > >
> Joe:
> > A nut in his hut.
> >
> Thanks for all your support, Joe. Some people
> just feel better when they have someone to talk
> to. It IS lonely
> > It must get really lonely being you Willy.
> >
Joe:
> A nut in his hut.
>
Thanks for all your support, Joe. Some people
just feel better when they have someone to talk
to. It IS lonely at the top.
The view from up here is really nice - on a clear
day I can see all the way to Radiance,
> > I belong to a very, very minor Hindu
> > sect whose sadhana includes blatant
> > displays of inappropriateness in public.
> >
> > It's our way of providing the opportunity
> > for others to work off their karma by
> > saying things about us and making fun of
> > our spiritual path - it's a c
> > > Oh well, at least you have Seroquel.
> > >
> > Can you send me one of yours?
> >
azgrey:
> Boy, you *are* a Texan aren't you?
>
See, Ray, it works almost every time!
...and that electricity-less hut in the country.
A nut in his hut.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, azgrey wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "WillyTex" wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > > I belong to a very, very minor Hindu
> > > > sect whose sadhana includes blatant
> > >
Whup, you've turned into Fartbrain again.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tartbrain wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "WillyTex" wrote:
> >
> > Ray:
> > > > Sometimes I read Richard's posts,
> > > > and I can't figure out what all the
> > > > fuss is about...
> > > >
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "WillyTex" wrote:
>
>
>
> > > See, Ray, it works almost every time!
> > >
> azgrey:
> > It must get really lonely being you Willy.
> >
> Well, I've got you and Joe hanging on my
> every word.
>
> > Oh well, at least you have Seroquel.
> >
> Can you s
> > See, Ray, it works almost every time!
> >
azgrey:
> It must get really lonely being you Willy.
>
Well, I've got you and Joe hanging on my
every word.
> Oh well, at least you have Seroquel.
>
Can you send me one of yours?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "WillyTex" wrote:
>
>
>
> > > I belong to a very, very minor Hindu
> > > sect whose sadhana includes blatant
> > > displays of inappropriateness in public.
> > >
> azgrey:
> > So your coitus with prairie dogs take
> > place in public?
> >
> See, Ray, it
> > They've got a lot of repressed anger hidden
> > away. Let's bring it out! Let's help them,
> > not hate them...
> >
Bhairitu:
> You sound really scared of us, Willy!
>
Right, 'Bhairitu', you're posting under a
pseudonym, but I'm the one that is scared.
> > I belong to a very, very minor Hindu
> > sect whose sadhana includes blatant
> > displays of inappropriateness in public.
> >
azgrey:
> So your coitus with prairie dogs take
> place in public?
>
See, Ray, it works almost every time!
Now they want to get REALLY pesonal. Don't
you just hat
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "WillyTex" wrote:
>
> Ray:
> > > Sometimes I read Richard's posts,
> > > and I can't figure out what all the
> > > fuss is about...
> > >
> Joe:
> > Somedays Richard remembers to take his
> > medication and other days he doesn't.
> > He can be mightily forge
My thoughts exactly. That Willy is a strange one.
Go figure.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, azgrey wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "WillyTex" wrote:
>
> >
> > I belong to a very, very minor Hindu
> > sect whose sadhana includes blatant
> > displays of inappropria
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "WillyTex" wrote:
>
> I belong to a very, very minor Hindu
> sect whose sadhana includes blatant
> displays of inappropriateness in public.
>
So your coitus with prairie dogs take place
in public?
Boy, that sure is inappropriate Willy.
Go figure.
t;
> > From: WillyTex
> > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: In Fairfield, Give Peace a chance/Rick is
> > Enlightened!
> > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> > Date: Wednesday, August 4, 2010, 10:52 AM
> >
> >
> > > > My morals were formed when
WillyTex wrote:
> Ray:
>
>>> Sometimes I read Richard's posts,
>>> and I can't figure out what all the
>>> fuss is about...
>>>
>>>
> Joe:
>
>> Somedays Richard remembers to take his
>> medication and other days he doesn't.
>> He can be mightily forgetful...
>>
>>
> Ray - Sometime
--- On Wed, 8/4/10, WillyTex wrote:
> From: WillyTex
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: In Fairfield, Give Peace a chance/Rick is
> Enlightened!
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Wednesday, August 4, 2010, 10:52 AM
>
>
> > > My morals were formed wh
I have it all Willie-boy and I'm living large, while you're in your
electricity-less hut in the country!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "WillyTex" wrote:
>
>
> So, what happened to all the money, Joe?
>
> > My morals were formed when I was a teenager
> > and haven't changed much since then - what
> > is right to me then, is still right to me
> > now: don't lie ...and don't make things up.
> >
Joe:
> Really Willy-boy? You're going to try and
> sell this notion to THIS group, who read
> you
Well I used to be in only Unity consciousness, but now I'm in Brahman
consciousness!
--- On Tue, 8/3/10, seventhray1 wrote:
> From: seventhray1
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: In Fairfield, Give Peace a chance/Rick is
> Enlightened!
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.co
Seventh, forget joe and his pejoratives. He doesn't any know better.
It is the entheogens.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1"
wrote:
>
> Maybe that's it. I can't really get a handle on him. Not that I try
that hard, but still..
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "
Maybe that's it. I can't really get a handle on him. Not that I try that
hard, but still..
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Joe" wrote:
>
> It's really very simple Ray. Somedays Richard remembers to take his
> medication and other days he doesn't. He can be mightily forgetful.
>
>
It's really very simple Ray. Somedays Richard remembers to take his medication
and other days he doesn't. He can be mightily forgetful.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1" wrote:
>
>
> Here's what I don't get. Sometimes I read Richard's posts, and I can't
> figure out what all
Willie-boy:
My morals were formed when I was a teenager and haven't changed much since
then - what is right
to me then, is still right to me now: don't lie
...and don't make things up.
Joe: Really Willy-boy? You're going to try and sell this notion to THIS group,
who read your wildly made
wrote:
>
> From: emptybill
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: In Fairfield, Give Peace a chance/Rick is
> Enlightened!
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Tuesday, August 3, 2010, 7:40 PM
>
>
> You're right. The scam is revealed. Psychologists only do
Here's what I don't get. Sometimes I read Richard's posts, and I can't
figure out what all the fuss is about. He sounds wise, gentle,
friendly. And then other times he is so toxic, that I won't go near
him. The other day I think he said he had read thousands of books on
spirituality in it's d
Judy:
> Likewise, seeing you as having unresolved
> personal resentments is a *lot* more charitable
> than seeing you as a "villain with a nefarious
> agenda." I should think you'd be relieved that
> I don't cast you as a nefarious villain...
>
Curtis is now a TMO type, in reverse. If anyone
The other day I speculated that when someone reappears after not having posted
for sometime, you somehow expect to see some change. Something different that
looks like they have progressed in personal growth. I said I didn't know what
it looked like, but I think this is what it looks like. It
But ... but ... what about the Woodfords?!?
I still have to read the whiners here!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter wrote:
>
>
> --- On Tue, 8/3/10, emptybill emptyb...@... wrote:
>
> From: emptybill emptyb...@...
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: In Fairfield, G
--- On Tue, 8/3/10, emptybill wrote:
From: emptybill
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: In Fairfield, Give Peace a chance/Rick is
Enlightened!
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, August 3, 2010, 7:40 PM
You're right. The scam is revealed. Psychologists only do what they do fo
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> > Curtis and I had a good long exchange specifically
> > about MMY--certainly Curtis felt we were talking
> > about "real" things--before Curtis decided to turn
> >
t...@... wrote:
>
> > From: PaliGap compost...@...
> > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: In Fairfield, Give Peace a chance/Rick
is Enlightened!
>
> snip
>
> > With all the talk here sometimes of "epistemology" I'm
> > surprised that "Narcissistic Personali
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "do.rflex" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "do.rflex" wrote:
>
> > > > It's very creepy to consider
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "do.rflex" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "do.rflex" wrote:
> > > It's very creepy to consider that this kind of crap is
> > > likely the primary or main dish and limit of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> Curtis and I had a good long exchange specifically
> about MMY--certainly Curtis felt we were talking
> about "real" things--before Curtis decided to turn
> it into a personal discussion of how I choose my
> "beliefs." It didn't get into
On Aug 3, 2010, at 4:22 PM, curtisdeltablues wrote:
> So far so good. I haven't been offended by anything she has said in this
> discussion. I disagree with a lot but it has all been cordial. And by now
> the shift from the topic to my perceived flaws is a pretty well-worn road. As
> long as
--- On Tue, 8/3/10, PaliGap wrote:
> From: PaliGap
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: In Fairfield, Give Peace a chance/Rick is
> Enlightened!
snip
> With all the talk here sometimes of "epistemology" I'm
> surprised that "Narcissistic Personality Disorde
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "do.rflex" wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine wrote:
> > >
> > > On Aug 3, 2010, at 1:33 PM, TurquoiseB wrote:
> > >
> > > > As usual, she never d
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "do.rflex" wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine wrote:
> >
> > On Aug 3, 2010, at 1:33 PM, TurquoiseB wrote:
> >
> > > As usual, she never dealt with your message. As Sal
> > > says, she can't. So she does the next best thing
Gee, you'd think that after making a complete horse's
ass of himself by claiming I'd been in a TMO "cocoon"
since learning TM and therefore wasn't aware that MMY
had a bad reputation among the non-TM public, Barry'd
try to be a *little* more careful he didn't screw up
with his next post.
But no...
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> Anyway, my take on your unresolved resentment came
> up in response to your silly claim that I considered
> you a "villain with a nefarious agenda" after I'd
> objected to the way you'd managed to twist my balanced
> view of MMY into an
> Perhaps books CAN teach us something. >I'm thinking Orwell and
Popper.
You're leaving out one of the greatest but less known philosophic texts,
Venus on the Half-Shell, which addresses our ultimate human question -
"Why are we born to suffer and die?".
> It reminds me of discussions of ab
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "PaliGap" wrote:
> "We all have personality disorders now"
> http://www.newstatesman.com/200507110021
Excellent. Money quote (referring to the DSM-IV list
of diagnostic criteria for narcissistic personality
disorder):
"It sounds frightfully specific, but loo
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
wrote:
> I was trying to see your point about the distinction
> between Maharishi's role and his personality. I get it
> that you don't feel understood or feel I am
> misrepresenting your POV. I couldn't find the quote
> but at one point
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine wrote:
>
> On Aug 3, 2010, at 9:57 AM, curtisdeltablues wrote:
>
> > And in any case, it seems to me you have both sets of
> >> unresolved feelings, affection and resentment, the
> >> conflict between them also being unresolved.
> >
> > Well I'l
> Gotta agree with Sal's assessment here. Judy not only (as you
suggested, Curtis) tried to divert attention away from the real topic
> I strongly support your challenges to her to >deal with the real topic
Are you kidding?
The only real question is whose hand the gun will be in after the d
On Aug 3, 2010, at 3:37 PM, Peter L Sutphen wrote:
> That was my doing, Rick. But it's gone way off topic since did that.
Excuses, excuses...
>
> Peter
>
>
> On Aug 3, 2010, at 4:06 PM, "Rick Archer" wrote:
>
>> I sure will feel relieved when this thread with “Rick is Enlightened!” in
>> t
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine wrote:.
> Gotta agree with Sal's assessment here. Judy
> not only (as you suggested, Curtis) tried to
> divert attention away from the real topic
> (Maharishi and his NPD) and onto y
I sure will feel relieved when this thread with "Rick is Enlightened!" in
the subject fizzles out.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine wrote:
>
> On Aug 3, 2010, at 1:33 PM, TurquoiseB wrote:
>
> > As usual, she never dealt with your message. As Sal
> > says, she can't. So she does the next best thing,
> > from her point of view...she takes the thread that
> > is discussing w
On Aug 3, 2010, at 1:33 PM, TurquoiseB wrote:
> As usual, she never dealt with your message. As Sal
> says, she can't. So she does the next best thing,
> from her point of view...she takes the thread that
> is discussing what she doesn't want discussed and
> renders that thread all but unreadable
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine wrote:
>
> On Aug 3, 2010, at 9:57 AM, curtisdeltablues wrote:
>
> > > And in any case, it seems to me you have both sets of
> > > unresolved feelings, affection and resentment, the
> > > conflict between them also being unresolved.
> >
> > Well
Great post , Richard. I like the point you make regarding the value of a
spiritual teacher is with your own experience of that teacher. Some people got
a lot of mileage from MMY and some didn't. The flaw most people make is trying
to establish their own experience of MMY as the "gold standard" o
On Aug 3, 2010, at 9:57 AM, curtisdeltablues wrote:
> And in any case, it seems to me you have both sets of
>> unresolved feelings, affection and resentment, the
>> conflict between them also being unresolved.
>
> Well I'll be the judge of that, or the judge that matters to me. I am doing
> fin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> That's 1 post out of 19, or slightly more
> than 5%. I am betting that I am SO much "not
> your role in life" that you'll spend a full
> 40% of your remaining posts this week dis-
> sing me or referring to me in some way.
Actually, I thi
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> > >
> > > What you're really objecting to here is that a
> > > lot of my rebuttals and corrections are of
> >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine wrote:
> Judy has once again, since she's getting her butt
> royally kicked by Curtis, done what she always does
> when cornered:
Says Sal, working very hard to move up to Barry's
level on the deluded fantasy scale.
made the discussion/argu
Turq:
> The fact that someone could possibly be so naive
> and so lost in a belief system that they would
> shell out thousands of dollars to learn to FLY,
> simply because representatives of that belief
> system said they could learn how indicates "nut
> case" or, at the very least, "religi
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > What you're really objecting to here is that a
> > lot of my rebuttals and corrections are of
> > things *you've* felt the need to put on the
> > record. You want to have
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> What you're really objecting to here is that a
> lot of my rebuttals and corrections are of
> things *you've* felt the need to put on the
> record. You want to have a free hand with your
> putdowns; you don't want to be accountable for
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> > >
> > > It's not really ad hominem. It *starts* with the observation
> > > that your expressed view
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > You've never quite gotten the concept of simply
> > wanting to have things on the record, have you?
>
> What I've never "gotten" (and I don't think
> I'm alone here in t
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > It's not really ad hominem. It *starts* with the observation
> > that your expressed views about MMY are so extreme as to
> > seem irrational. Only then does it l
On Aug 3, 2010, at 8:19 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>>
>> I decided to go back and clear up a bunch of your
>> misrepresentations, Curtis (inadvertent or otherwise),
>> in this earlier post from you (breaking Barry's Rule
>> again; oh, well!)
Meta-comment: I think this series has been one of our best in terms of tone
and I appreciate that. Hopefully you have gotten a chance to express some view
more explicitly. (I'm thinking of the belief distinctions) I have also found
some productive pieces for me to think about.
I was trying
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> You've never quite gotten the concept of simply
> wanting to have things on the record, have you?
What I've never "gotten" (and I don't think
I'm alone here in this), is your perceived
need *to* "go on the record" on a forum read
by a
Here goes Barry, ignoring me again!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > I decided to go back and clear up a bunch of your
> > misrepresentations, Curtis (inadvertent or otherwise),
> > in this earlier post
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> I decided to go back and clear up a bunch of your
> misrepresentations, Curtis (inadvertent or otherwise),
> in this earlier post from you (breaking Barry's Rule
> again; oh, well!):
Translation: "Ooops. I pretended to bail from the
a
I decided to go back and clear up a bunch of your
misrepresentations, Curtis (inadvertent or otherwise),
in this earlier post from you (breaking Barry's Rule
again; oh, well!):
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"
emptybill:
> My collections enable me to query the Lama.
>
Maybe Turq thinks his 'opinions' are somehow
apriori and that he didn't learn them from the
written word.
But we all get most of our knowledge from our
senses, mainly our eyes and our ears. Most of
the things we know we either heard
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
>
> TurquoiseB wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emptybill" wrote:
> >
> >> When the mind's eye rests on objects illuminated by truth and
> >> reality, it understands and comprehends them, and functions
> >> intelligentl
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
wrote:
Don't you mean.
> Thinking is effortless. Typing takes almost no energy. Expressing my
ideas - Priceless
My collections enable me to query the Lama. He is a Geshe Rabjam so I
need to be precise when discussing a particular view. The customary FFL
self-congratulatory laudations that are found here are for those who are
omniscient or inflationary.
"Book-ess?
Book-ess!? I don't need no stinkin'
book
WillyTex wrote:
>
>>> Yet Another Book.
>>>
>>> Did you somehow think that after quoting
>>> it your position would be perceived as
>>> stronger? :-)
>>>
>>>
> Bhairitu:
>
>> Bill must have quite a library. Either that
>> or his walls are plastered with pages from
>> books. Som
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "WillyTex" wrote:
>
>
>
> > > I think you have a tremendous amount of
> > > unresolved personal resentment against MMY that
> > > prevents you from taking a rational view of him.
> > >
> Turq:
> > For the record, I do not agree with your assessment
> > of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emptybill" wrote:
> I think you don't take your own b.s. to heart
Truer words...
He doesn't practice what he preaches and projects his
flaws onto others. That's one approach to getting rid
of the self.
since you obviously
> believe in yourself - even tho
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "WillyTex" wrote:
>
>
>
> > > I think you have a tremendous amount of
> > > unresolved personal resentment against MMY that
> > > prevents you from taking a rational view of him.
> > >
> Turq:
> > For the record, I do not agree with your assessment
> > of
> > Yet Another Book.
> >
> > Did you somehow think that after quoting
> > it your position would be perceived as
> > stronger? :-)
> >
Bhairitu:
> Bill must have quite a library. Either that
> or his walls are plastered with pages from
> books. Sometimes I imagine that is what
> Willy's
emptybill wrote:
> Your own "books" are your opinions.
>
> As best I can tell, their most important quality for you is that they
> are "yours".
>
> Likewise, your opinions are "just opinions" as you proclaim so often.
> Thus they do not and cannot have any worth to anyone else since by your
> own a
TurquoiseB wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emptybill" wrote:
>
>> When the mind's eye rests on objects illuminated by truth and
>> reality, it understands and comprehends them, and functions
>> intelligently; but when it turns to the twilight world of change
>> and decay, it
Your own "books" are your opinions.
As best I can tell, their most important quality for you is that they
are "yours".
Likewise, your opinions are "just opinions" as you proclaim so often.
Thus they do not and cannot have any worth to anyone else since by your
own admission they lack reference to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> > No, I don't think you're a villain with a nefarious
> > agenda. I think you have a tremendous amount of
> > unresolved personal resentment against MMY
>
> Hey you
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emptybill" wrote:
>
> When the mind's eye rests on objects illuminated by truth and
> reality, it understands and comprehends them, and functions
> intelligently; but when it turns to the twilight world of change
> and decay, it can only form opinions, its
> > Is that what it is? I was wondering. Seems like an awful
> > lot of energ put into..this meta talk, or scientific
> > empiricism, or something.
>
> Thinking is effortless.
>
TM is based on thinking, that's why it is effortless activity.
> Typing takes almost no energy.
>
Typing
When the mind's eye rests on objects illuminated by truth and reality,
it understands and comprehends them, and functions intelligently; but
when it turns to the twilight world of change and decay, it can only
form opinions, its vision is confused and its beliefs shifting, and its
eems to lack int
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
[to Curtis:]
> > No, I don't think you're a villain with a nefarious
> > agenda. I think you have a tremendous amount of
> > unresolved personal resentment against MMY that
> >
> > I think you have a tremendous amount of
> > unresolved personal resentment against MMY that
> > prevents you from taking a rational view of him.
> >
Turq:
> For the record, I do not agree with your assessment
> of Curtis and either his motivations or his
> "unresolved resentment" towards Mah
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> -- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> wrote:
>
> > Instead you cling to a comfortable caricature of me as a
> > villain with a nefarious agenda. To each his or her own.
>
> Oops, I better not let this stand lest
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emptybill" wrote:
>
> Those "places" are defined by accepted scripture ...
NONE of which are anything more than a claim made
by a human being based on their or others' subjective
experience. No "scripture" in human history has ever
been written by anyone o
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1" wrote:
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> wrote:
> >
> > Since understanding my point is not your agenda you failed
> > again to understand what my point was or why I was making it.
> > I have accepted the limits
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1" wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emptybill" wrote:
> >
> >
> > Your meta-talk sounds like scientific empiricism.
>
> Is that what it is? I was wondering. Seems like an awful lot of energy
> put into..this meta
1 - 100 of 255 matches
Mail list logo
