This is really an interesting old MMY quote.
Reads remarkably like what, going to sit with a saint.
>
> Question: Some people have healing powers. They can cure other people.
>
> Maharishi: Yes.
>
> Question: Are these suggestive powers the strength of one mind over another
> mind, or someting
Let me get this straight. Dr. Pete was into TM, then SBS's
programs;...definitely brain changing techniques! (no brainer).
...
Indonesia's President, Susilo Bamgang Yudhoyono's
composition "From Jakarto Oslo for Our World":
...
"Far away from the edge of the world
I come to bring hope
Together,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "marekreavis" wrote:
> >
> > > One more thing - I know Dr Pete, who used to post here, was adament that
> > > enlightenment was not dependent on or a function of how the brain is
> > > working.
>
> Question: Some people have healing powers. They can cure other people.
>
> Maharishi: Yes.
>
> Question: Are these suggestive powers the strength of one mind over another
> mind, or someting else?
>
> Maharishi: There is mental healing through the power of the mind. But this
> healing
Question: Some people have healing powers. They can cure other people.
Maharishi: Yes.
Question: Are these suggestive powers the strength of one mind over another
mind, or someting else?
Maharishi: There is mental healing through the power of the mind. But this
healing power is a quality of
This just in:
This comes from a new book from MUM Press called, "Transcendental Meditation
with Questions and Answers".
___
Question: Some people have healing powers. They can cure other people.
Maharishi: Yes.
>
> >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Everyone here has
>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Everyone here has experimented pretty deeply in what it means to be
> > > > > > a human being, or at least fooled around with the internal
> > > > > > machinery for extended periods; TM not necessarily the only method
> > > > > > used. Maharishi made many claims abo
> > > > >
> > > > > Everyone here has experimented pretty deeply in what it means to be a
> > > > > human being, or at least fooled around with the internal machinery
> > > > > for extended periods; TM not necessarily the only method used.
> > > > > Maharishi made many claims about the outc
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Susan" wrote:
>
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote:
> > > >
>
> > > > >
> > > > > I too like Jill Bolte Taylor's insights because it is kept simple and
> > > > >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Susan" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > I too like Jill Bolte Taylor's insights because it is kept simple and
> > > > clear. If I were in a contrary mood, I might ask if we have to destroy
> > >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "marekreavis" wrote:
>
> Sorry to hear of your stroke, Buck, glad to know that you came out on the
> other side. I would be interested to hear how your experiences with that
> relate to your concepts re awakening.
>
> You are obviously not in a position
Sorry to hear of your stroke, Buck, glad to know that you came out on the other
side. I would be interested to hear how your experiences with that relate to
your concepts re awakening.
You are obviously not in a position to speak knowledgeably about my life,
however.
***
--- In FairfieldLif
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Susan" wrote:
>One reason I think that these awakened states are a good thing is when I think
>back to the sense of unity and light that seemed to permeate my childhood
>years, I think that was really good and that was and is a flavor of awakening.
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "marekreavis" wrote:
>
> > One more thing - I know Dr Pete, who used to post here, was adament that
> > enlightenment was not dependent on or a function of how the brain is
> > working. Not sure why he felt that way. I am just remembering that.
> >
It i
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Susan" wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > But I don't think any term like enlightenment does anything but cause
> > > confusion. Maharishi's use of the term and his many variations of its
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Susan" wrote:
>
>
>
> >
> >
> > But I don't think any term like enlightenment does anything but cause
> > confusion. Maharishi's use of the term and his many variations of its
> > characteristics and methods of attaining it did more to obfuscate than
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "marekreavis" wrote:
>
> Hey, Susan. I don't know if I could say anything about a "prior state". To
> whatever degree I have any insight into how mind and awareness develops and
> works, I'd say that there's a realization of a fundamental non-involved and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote:
> >
> > And non-meditators, what could they possibly have to offer here?
> > -Buck in FF
>
> Buck, since you "hit the ground ranting" again this week,
> let's have a look at this part
Hey, Susan. I don't know if I could say anything about a "prior state". To
whatever degree I have any insight into how mind and awareness develops and
works, I'd say that there's a realization of a fundamental non-involved and
continuous awareness. And, yes, an absence of sense of self that I on
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "marekreavis" wrote:
>
> Curtis, for me that "shift of attention" from one state of mind (i.e., from
> dissociative state to emotionally engaged state) doesn't occur; or, to the
> degree it occurs, there's still a fundamental "not doing", uninvolved,
> se
Curtis, for me that "shift of attention" from one state of mind (i.e., from
dissociative state to emotionally engaged state) doesn't occur; or, to the
degree it occurs, there's still a fundamental "not doing", uninvolved,
separateness that exists within which these shifts happen. So my experienc
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "marekreavis" wrote:
> >
> > This (Curtis' paragraph below) is something worth discussing
> > on this particular forum, for sure.
> >
> > Everyone here has experimented pretty deeply in wh
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "marekreavis" wrote:
>
> This (Curtis' paragraph below) is something worth discussing on this
> particular forum, for sure.
>
> Everyone here has experimented pretty deeply in what it means to be a human
> being, or at least fooled around with the internal
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
>
> Curtis, I shall follow in the footsteps of my fellow
> minion Marek and praise you for your tasty choice of
> both words and ideas...
Well you two were pretty much obligated to or you would have gotten a rash of
shit from me for betrayi
This (Curtis' paragraph below) is something worth discussing on this particular
forum, for sure.
Everyone here has experimented pretty deeply in what it means to be a human
being, or at least fooled around with the internal machinery for extended
periods; TM not necessarily the only method used
Curtis, I shall follow in the footsteps of my fellow
minion Marek and praise you for your tasty choice of
both words and ideas...
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
wrote:
>
>
> The whole team concept gets in the way of an interesting
> series of questions:
>
> 1. What
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote:
> >
> > Nablusoss this is beautiful really. He was on script to the end.
> >
> > Did you notice that the number of proclaimed meditators on FFL is on the
> > rise? Vaj more rece
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote:
>
> And non-meditators, what could they possibly have to offer here?
> -Buck in FF
Buck, since you "hit the ground ranting" again this week,
let's have a look at this particular rantlet, shall we?
I doubt I'm the only person here who sees your
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote:
> >
> > Nablusoss this is beautiful really. He was on script to the end.
> >
> > Did you notice that the number of proclaimed meditators on FFL is on the
> > rise? Vaj more re
>
>
> >
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Nablusoss this is beautiful really. He was on script to the end.
> > > >
> > > > Did you notice that the number of proclaimed meditators on FFL is on
> > > > the rise? Vaj more recently definitively said he was a meditator.
> > > > -Buck
> > > >
> >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote:
>
>
> >
> > >
> > > Nablusoss this is beautiful really. He was on script to the end.
> > >
> > > Did you notice that the number of proclaimed meditators on FFL is on the
> > > rise? Vaj more recently definitively said he was a meditator.
>
> >
> > Nablusoss this is beautiful really. He was on script to the end.
> >
> > Did you notice that the number of proclaimed meditators on FFL is on the
> > rise? Vaj more recently definitively said he was a meditator.
> > -Buck
> >
>
> And CurtisDb too admitted recently here that he h
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote:
>
> Nablusoss this is beautiful really. He was on script to the end.
>
> Did you notice that the number of proclaimed meditators on FFL is on the
> rise? Vaj more recently definitively said he was a meditator.
> -Buck
>
And CurtisDb to
Nablusoss this is beautiful really. He was on script to the end.
Did you notice that the number of proclaimed meditators on FFL is on the rise?
Vaj more recently definitively said he was a meditator.
-Buck
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In Fairfie
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "wgm4u" wrote:
>
> Proof that MMY was primarily concerned with spreading Vedic culture in
> Society in general and not interested in individual enlightenment per se,
> only a personal Guru could/would want to do that!
>
> (that's OK too)
Maharishi's fi
Proof that MMY was primarily concerned with spreading Vedic culture in Society
in general and not interested in individual enlightenment per se, only a
personal Guru could/would want to do that!
(that's OK too)
36 matches
Mail list logo
