--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robert" wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
> > > wrote:
> > >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
> > wrote:
> >> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >>> --- In Fai
> > According to MMY, meditation is based
> > on thinking.
> >
> > Meditation means simply 'to think
> > things over'.
> >
> > If so, then everyone meditates.
> >
emptybill:
> You must have never done TM.
>
Let's review:
If I think, I meditate; everyone thinks;
so, then everyone meditates.
"Medit
You must have never done TM.
This is an idiots definition.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Richard J. Williams"
wrote:
> >
> Or, I guess it all depends on how you
> can define 'meditation'. According to
> MMY, meditation is based on thinking.
>
> Meditation means simply 'to think
> thing
The millions are awake enough for physical labor; but only one in a million is
awake enough for effective intellectual exertion, only one in a hundred
millions to a poetic or divine life. To be awake is to be alive. I have never
yet met a man who was quite awake. How could I have looked him in t
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
>
>
> On Feb 19, 2012, at 3:12 PM, azgrey wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > I think the most I can say at this point is that my "path" is
> > > one of gradually increasing transparency.
>
On Feb 19, 2012, at 3:12 PM, azgrey wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> >
> > I think the most I can say at this point is that my "path" is
> > one of gradually increasing transparency.
>
> Here's to hoping you succeed and completely disappear.
>
> Cheers.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> I think the most I can say at this point is that my "path" is
> one of gradually increasing transparency.
Here's to hoping you succeed and completely disappear.
Cheers.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" wrote:
> Maharishi was all about innocent practice. He didn't want us to get caught up
> in flashy experiences and miss "capturing the fort" (his analogy) because
> we're too busy exploring gold and diamond mines. The "fort" includes all the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
> > wrote:
> >
> > > If you are meditating and think that meditation will take you
> >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
> wrote:
>
> > If you are meditating and think that meditation will take you
> > from A to B, what is A like, and what is B like, and what is
> > on the connexion betwee
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
wrote:
> If you are meditating and think that meditation will take you
> from A to B, what is A like, and what is B like, and what is
> on the connexion between A and B?
I think the most I can say at this point is that my "path" is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
> wrote:
>
>> What do you think or feel the characteristics of your path are?
>
> Boy, I'm sorry, but I don't know what that question
> even means. I do TM and the TM-Sid
On 02/16/2012 08:00 PM, Buck wrote:
> The world could be a better place.
>
Well, okay then Buck, what's your vision of "a better place?"
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
> wrote:
> > What do you think or feel the characteristics of your path
> > are? I am just curious, I do not intend to argue about it,
> > or bring in details of anythin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
> > wrote:
> >> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >>> --- In Fai
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
wrote:
> What do you think or feel the characteristics of your path are?
Boy, I'm sorry, but I don't know what that question
even means. I do TM and the TM-Sidhis, then I go about
my business. You'll have to be more specific if you
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
> wrote:
>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
>>> wrote:
>
I used the t
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
> > wrote:
> > > I used the term 'devotional path' in a general way; being
> > > devot
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
> wrote:
> >
> > Response to Judy.
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> > > As I go back and reread your post, though, I'm a little
> > > c
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
wrote:
>
> Response to Judy.
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
> > wrote:
> >> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wro
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
wrote:
>
> Response to Judy.
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> > As I go back and reread your post, though, I'm a little
> > confused as to whether by "devotion" you mean devotion
> > to MMY or a devotio
Response to Judy.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
> wrote:
>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
>>> wrote:
>>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
You need to get out more Turqo, not just dream about the good old days
:-)
> A few ads from the grand old days of medicine, all touting trademarked
> "cures for what ails ya," all sold "because the science says so."
>
> [Lloyd Cocaine
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Here is an article on enlightenment by vice-president of
> > > MU
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
> wrote:
>
> > Here is an article on enlightenment by vice-president of
> > MUM Craig Pearson:
> >
> > http://issue5.tmmagazine.org/enlightenment-throughout-history.ht
Buck, your message seems to be more and more a call for intolerance. Appeals
using militaristic metaphors carry (to me, at least) subliminal suggestions of
violence. You decry how long time meditators are treated by TMO officials but
call for shunning those whom you believe don't believe and act
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote:
>
> People just should
> come to meditation.
>
> The world should be a better place with
> more meditators.
> All people should have more
> resolve to meditate
> if only because the science says so.
> We would all be better off.
A few ads from t
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
wrote:
> Here is an article on enlightenment by vice-president of
> MUM Craig Pearson:
>
> http://issue5.tmmagazine.org/enlightenment-throughout-history.html
>
> At least this shows that despite the heavy-handed promotion
> of TM
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote:
>
> The world could be a better place.
>
> Look, the need is great for transcending meditators now to do their practice.
> For disciplined transcending meditators within the power and light of the
> Unified Field in their practice. Gather fr
Seriously, we all need to do something
about the none-meditator.
It is time to shun none-meditation
and the person without meditation
for not pulling their own weight.
For spiritual slacking. It's not
just lost opportunity, not meditating.
It's a crime against everyone to not
be a meditator.
P
2-nd Dragoon Regiment General: (by Mikael Aguirre)...
http://www.museumsyndicate.com/images/5/40331.jpg
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote:
>
> The world could be a better place.
>
> Look, the need is great for transcending meditators now to do their practice.
> For disciplined
The world could be a better place.
Look, the need is great for transcending meditators now to do their practice.
For disciplined transcending meditators within the power and light of the
Unified Field in their practice. Gather friends who are meditators. A group
of 100 makes a company. Ten
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
>
> On 02/16/2012 12:25 PM, nablusoss1008 wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
> >
> >
> >> I have also heard that Maharishi when told of teachers who had moved on
> >> to more advanced paths commented that he
On 02/16/2012 12:25 PM, nablusoss1008 wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
>
>
>> I have also heard that Maharishi when told of teachers who had moved on
>> to more advanced paths commented that he thought that was good.
>
> I also heard that in the Great Pyramid in Egy
That website will rot your brain, for sure. Hagelin has no demonstrable
Sidhis. He's promoting demon-infected programs.
...
Here's a better website:
http://www.optoutprescreen.com
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
> I have also heard that Maharishi when told of teachers who had moved on
> to more advanced paths commented that he thought that was good.
I also heard that in the Great Pyramid in Egypt Sidhas are living who were
initiated 5000 years
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
>
>
> On Feb 16, 2012, at 1:03 PM, Xenophaneros Anartaxius wrote:
>
> > Those of us who responded to the initial post by Buck were just
> > riffing off of it, each of us interpreting 'non meditation' as we
> > saw fit. I think Buck may have
On 02/16/2012 10:03 AM, Xenophaneros Anartaxius wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Richard J. Williams"
> wrote:
Non meditation as a term means 'no thought' which
is almost exactly what the term transcendental...
meditation means, 'beyond thought'.
>> Vaj:
>>
On Feb 16, 2012, at 1:03 PM, Xenophaneros Anartaxius wrote:
Those of us who responded to the initial post by Buck were just
riffing off of it, each of us interpreting 'non meditation' as we
saw fit. I think Buck may have meant 'non meditation' to refer to
those who do not meditate, or thos
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Richard J. Williams" wrote:
>
>>> Non meditation as a term means 'no thought' which
>>> is almost exactly what the term transcendental...
>>>
>>> meditation means, 'beyond thought'.
>>>
> Vaj:
>> In the context of these quotes, that is not what is
>> meant
> > Although we are big on asking for objective proof
> > of subjective claims here on FFL, I for one wish
> > to say that I hope neither of your spiritual paths
> > requires you to take the dump truck silence test
> > anytime soon...
> >
Vaj:
> Of course the ultimate "silence test" has to be the
>
> > Non meditation as a term means 'no thought' which
> > is almost exactly what the term transcendental...
> >
> > meditation means, 'beyond thought'.
> >
Vaj:
> In the context of these quotes, that is not what is
> meant by non-meditation. In TM-speak, the closest
> thing I can think of is
> > > However, I recently stumbled upon an example of secular
> > > intransigence...
> > >
> > Buck, what was the example of spiritual intransigence you
> > refer to? Did you mean to include a link or a quote or
> > something?
> >
Buck:
> Dear Authfriend,
> I shan't give pleasure repeating the anti
> > > > However, I recently stumbled upon an example of secular
> > > > intransigence that may give readers a sense of how spiritual
> > > > people feel when their methods as technologies are criticized.
> > > > As you will see but for the rigorous research conducted it
> > > > suggests that it
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robert" wrote:
>
> The samskaras resolve themselves when they are viewed in terms of Self.
> When the witness to thoughts is established then self-referral is a natural
> process and this produces the experience of subtler states of what caused the
> whol
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
>
>
> On Feb 14, 2012, at 10:53 PM, Xenophaneros Anartaxius wrote:
>
> > In the TM system, so I understand, CC is not permanent, it
> > eventually dissolves into other states.
>
> CC is THE end state in yoga-darshana and various tantric syste
When I go to bed at night I prepare myself for the equivalent of a three
feature movie. My dreams are that clear, that long and usually entertaining.
They average about three main themes per night. I can understand why I wake up
just as tired as when I went to bed. That is a lot of work doing al
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
> wrote:
>
> > I woke up this morning, not feeling particularly great (I am
> > under medication on the advice of a physician). I was
> > dreaming. I dreamed I was in so
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
wrote:
> I woke up this morning, not feeling particularly great (I am
> under medication on the advice of a physician). I was
> dreaming. I dreamed I was in some movement facility, which in
> my dreams always seems to resemble being
HEJ DUDE
This title construction noise...you should ask Jemima Pitman for help-
but she was a little busy wasn't she [:D]
here some photos:
Mallorca, Spain
1972 January - March
an island in the Mediterranean off the east coast of Spain
Hotel Bahia del Este, Calla Millor, east side of the islan
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote:
> >
> > Good rap, Xeno. My experience is similar to yours, in that over the
> > years "intellectual knowledge" has become less and less interesting
to
> > me
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
>
>
> On Feb 15, 2012, at 7:43 AM, Robert wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Feb 14, 2012, at 10:40 AM, Xenophaneros Anartaxius wrote:
> > >
> > > > Non meditation as a term means 'no thou
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater wrote:
>
> Hey Barry, what year was that TTC? I think my sister and brother
> in law were on that course.
1972. The first half of what has become known as the
Mallorca-Fiuggi course was there in La Antilla. Inter-
estingly enough, I never foun
Hey Barry, what year was that TTC? I think my sister and brother in law were on
that course.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> >
> > On Feb 15, 2012, at 9:00 AM, turquoiseb wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yaho
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
>
> On Feb 15, 2012, at 9:00 AM, turquoiseb wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> > > >
> > > > No attachment to thoughts as they
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
>
> Good rap, Xeno. My experience is similar to yours, in that over the
> years "intellectual knowledge" has become less and less interesting to
> me, to the point that now I have little tolerance for it. And
> interestingly in my case the "t
On Feb 15, 2012, at 9:00 AM, turquoiseb wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> >
> > No attachment to thoughts as they arise, persist and then
> > disappear is what eventually dissipates the samska
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> >
> > No attachment to thoughts as they arise, persist and then
> > disappear is what eventually dissipates the samskaras.
> > Retreating into silence just causes addi
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
>
>
> On Feb 14, 2012, at 10:53 PM, Xenophaneros Anartaxius wrote:
>
>> In the TM system, so I understand, CC is not permanent, it
>> eventually dissolves into other states.
>
> CC is THE end state in yoga-darshana and various tantric systems.
On Feb 15, 2012, at 7:43 AM, Robert wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
>
>
> On Feb 14, 2012, at 10:40 AM, Xenophaneros Anartaxius wrote:
>
> > Non meditation as a term means 'no thought' which is almost
exactly what the term transcendental meditation means, 'beyond
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
>
>
> On Feb 14, 2012, at 10:40 AM, Xenophaneros Anartaxius wrote:
>
> > Non meditation as a term means 'no thought' which is almost exactly what
> > the term transcendental meditation means, 'beyond thought'.
>
>
> In the context of these qu
On Feb 14, 2012, at 10:53 PM, Xenophaneros Anartaxius wrote:
In the TM system, so I understand, CC is not permanent, it
eventually dissolves into other states.
CC is THE end state in yoga-darshana and various tantric systems.
It's only from the POV of advaita vedanta that sees brahman
co
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
>>
>> On 02/13/2012 06:11 PM, Buck wrote:
>>> Non-meditation
>>>
>>> It seems to me that many non-meditators have forgotten�or never
>>> knew�what it is like to suffer an unhappy co
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
>
>
> On Feb 13, 2012, at 9:11 PM, Buck wrote:
>
> > However, I recently stumbled upon an example of secular
> > intransigence that may give readers a sense of how spiritual people
> > feel when their methods as technologies are criticized.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
>
> On 02/13/2012 06:11 PM, Buck wrote:
> > Non-meditation
> >
> > It seems to me that many non-meditators have forgottenor never knewwhat
> > it is like to suffer an unhappy collision with scientific rationality. We
> > are open to good
Good rap, Xeno. My experience is similar to yours, in that over the
years "intellectual knowledge" has become less and less interesting to
me, to the point that now I have little tolerance for it. And
interestingly in my case the "tipping point" was because of my own
experience -- some of it with R
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
>
> On Feb 14, 2012, at 10:40 AM, Xenophaneros Anartaxius wrote:
>
>> Non meditation as a term means 'no thought' which is almost exactly what the
>> term transcendental meditation means, 'beyond thought'.
>
> In the context of these quotes, tha
Well first off, Non-meditation. It's one Big sin against nature.
Guru Dev was right, "To get a human body is a rare thing -make full use of it.
...
Every second in human life is very valuable. If you don't value this, then you
will have nothing in hand and you will weep in the end."
--- In Fa
Two excellent posts today, Xenophaneros Anartaxius, I enjoyed them -- and much
of what you say mirrors my own experience.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogro
Thanks for your response, Xeno. All I can say is that I was
pretty clear on this...
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
wrote:
> I do believe Maharishi talked about this, but it seems to be
> buried in off-hand comments he has made. It is not directly
> spoken of, an
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
> wrote:
>
>> The reason for meditating using any system is to get
>> beyond conceptual thought and experience not only the
>> context of thought but the relationship o
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote:
> >
> > > However, I recently stumbled upon an example of secular
> > > intransigence that may give readers a sense of h
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote:
>
> > However, I recently stumbled upon an example of secular
> > intransigence that may give readers a sense of how spiritual
> > people feel when their methods as technologies ar
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "John" wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "John" wrote:
> > >
> > > Buck,
> > >
> > > The Red Chinese are more likely non-meditators. Yet in material terms,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "John" wrote:
> >
> > Buck,
> >
> > The Red Chinese are more likely non-meditators. Yet in material terms,
> > they appear to be properous than most countries in Southeast Asia. They'v
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "John" wrote:
>
> Buck,
>
> The Red Chinese are more likely non-meditators. Yet in material terms, they
> appear to be properous than most countries in Southeast Asia. They've bought
> about one trillion dollars in US government bonds. Are you saying t
On 02/13/2012 11:06 PM, nablusoss1008 wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
>> On 02/13/2012 06:11 PM, Buck wrote:
>>> Non-meditation
>>>
>>> It seems to me that many non-meditators have forgotten—or never knew—what
>>> it is like to suffer an unhappy collision with sci
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
wrote:
> The reason for meditating using any system is to get
> beyond conceptual thought and experience not only the
> context of thought but the relationship of thought with
> what it represents, which typically is rather tenuous
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote:
> However, I recently stumbled upon an example of secular
> intransigence that may give readers a sense of how spiritual
> people feel when their methods as technologies are criticized.
> As you will see but for the rigorous research conducted
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
>
> On Feb 13, 2012, at 9:11 PM, Buck wrote:
>
>> However, I recently stumbled upon an example of secular
>> intransigence that may give readers a sense of how spiritual people
>> feel when their methods as technologies are criticized. As you will
>
Buck:
> Certainly a human life is a terrible
> potential to waste in non-meditation.
>
Or, I guess it all depends on how you
can define 'meditation'. According to
MMY, meditation is based on thinking.
Meditation means simply 'to think
things over'.
If so, then everyone meditates.
There'
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
>
> On 02/13/2012 06:11 PM, Buck wrote:
> > Non-meditation
> >
> > It seems to me that many non-meditators have forgottenor never knewwhat
> > it is like to suffer an unhappy collision with scientific rationality. We
> > are open to good
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, azgrey wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote:
> >
> >
> > Non-meditation
> >
> > It seems to me that many non-meditators have forgottenor never knewwhat
> > it is like to suffer an unhappy collision with scientific rationa
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote:
>
>
> Non-meditation
>
> It seems to me that many non-meditators have forgottenor never knewwhat it
> is like to suffer an unhappy collision with scientific rationality. We are
> open to good evidence and sound argument as a matter of pri
There aren't enough active meditators on the planet to make any such
conclusions via cause and effect. There's no evidence for the ME.
...
How ya comin' on the list of Sins?
.
What if somebody ordered some Chinese food at the Olive Garden? Is that a sin
and would the punishment be 10 slashes with
Buck,
The Red Chinese are more likely non-meditators. Yet in material terms, they
appear to be properous than most countries in Southeast Asia. They've bought
about one trillion dollars in US government bonds. Are you saying they are
delusional?
JR
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "
87 matches
Mail list logo
