Let them all eat Petits Fours.
Oh gosh. Did I say that?
It's so hard being real when yer a mayavadin.
Will the most real at man plz appear?
Ann, I don't claim any kind of understanding of search engine rankings, but
Rick took the Curtis situation seriously enough that Richard was kicked off and
banned (meaning, he's blocked from even trying to resubscribe.) After that,
Richard made several attempts to rejoin under new usernames
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, j_alexander_stanley@... wrote :
The banning of Richard from FFL was done by Rick for reasons of Richard's
behavior toward Curtis. With Curtis now effectively banned from FFL, there is
no longer any reason to keep Richard out of FFL. I propose that
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote :
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, j_alexander_stanley@... wrote :
I'm trying to be fair to all parties involved, but as the feared, loved, and
respected Almighty Grand Poobah of FFL2, I reserve the right to
Yeah, maybe we could get some kind of nuclear deal out of this.
From: awoelfleba...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2015 8:35 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Proposal: Curtis in exchange for Richard
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, j_alexander_stanley@... wrote :
Ann, I don't claim any kind of understanding of search engine rankings, but
Rick took the Curtis situation seriously enough that Richard was kicked off and
banned (meaning, he's blocked from even trying to resubscribe.)
: [FairfieldLife] Re: Proposal: Curtis in exchange for Richard
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, j_alexander_stanley@... wrote :
The banning of Richard from FFL was done by Rick for reasons of Richard's
behavior toward Curtis. With Curtis now effectively banned from FFL
I'm trying to be fair to all parties involved, but as the feared, loved, and
respected Almighty Grand Poobah of FFL2, I reserve the right to engineer its
subscriber list as capriciously as I gosh darned please.
In the meantime... tea, Darjeeling, organic, hot.
---In
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, j_alexander_stanley@... wrote :
I'm trying to be fair to all parties involved, but as the feared, loved, and
respected Almighty Grand Poobah of FFL2, I reserve the right to engineer its
subscriber list as capriciously as I gosh darned please.
We're
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, j_alexander_stanley@... wrote :
The banning of Richard from FFL was done by Rick for reasons of Richard's
behavior toward Curtis. With Curtis now effectively banned from FFL, there is
no longer any reason to keep Richard out of FFL. I propose that
I'm sure he'd like to Empty, but Buck has silenced him here.
Richard, I think people get obsessed with persona because of fear. And of
course, fear of dying is at the root of all other fears. Good to have
compassion for the human condition...
On Monday, September 29, 2014 9:37 PM, 'Richard J. Williams'
pundits...@gmail.com [FairfieldLife]
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, dhamiltony2k5@... wrote :
The rule defines consent as an affirmative, conscious and voluntary
agreement.”
Towards a greater clarity in FFL forum discussion I feel we should adopt the
California decorum for discussion and drop away from the Texas
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, dhamiltony2k5@... wrote :
The rule defines consent as an affirmative, conscious and voluntary
agreement.”
Towards a greater clarity in FFL forum discussion I feel we should adopt the
California decorum for discussion and drop away from the Texas
salyavin, I thought Buck was addressing Richard in general. What makes you
think it's about what Rick posts?! I'm confused...
On Monday, September 29, 2014 9:24 AM, salyavin808 no_re...@yahoogroups.com
wrote:
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, dhamiltony2k5@... wrote :
The
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, dhamiltony2k5@... wrote :
The rule defines consent as an affirmative, conscious and voluntary
agreement.”
Towards a greater clarity in FFL forum discussion I feel we should
adopt the California decorum for discussion and drop away from the
Texas
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote :
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
dhamiltony2k5@... mailto:dhamiltony2k5@... wrote :
The rule defines consent as an affirmative, conscious and voluntary
agreement.”
Towards a
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, dhamiltony2k5@... wrote :
The rule defines consent as an affirmative, conscious and voluntary
agreement.”
Towards a greater clarity in FFL forum discussion I feel we should
adopt the California decorum for discussion and drop away from the
Texas norm.
On 9/29/2014 9:27 AM, Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
wrote:
salyavin, I thought Buck was addressing Richard in general. What makes
you think it's about what Rick posts?! I'm confused...
/Welcome to the club! Where is Judy when we need her? How did he get in
here? What!?
Richard, I like your approach, reply to everyone at least once per day. I
exclude people who have said they don't read my posts. Or people who almost
never reply to my posts. Except when I want to set the record straight.
You could write a book about all this. Do you know, there is almost no
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote :
Richard, I like your approach, reply to everyone at least once per day. I
exclude people who have said they don't read my posts. Or people who almost
never reply to my posts. Except when I want to set the record straight.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote :
On 9/29/2014 9:27 AM, Share Long sharelong60@... mailto:sharelong60@...
[FairfieldLife] wrote:
salyavin, I thought Buck was addressing Richard in general. What makes you
think it's about what Rick posts?! I'm confused...
On 9/29/2014 1:07 PM, Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
wrote:
Richard, I like your approach, reply to everyone at least once per
day. I exclude people who have said they don't read my posts.
/We don't really know who is reading our messages - they could say they
don't read
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From now until election day, up the weekly maximum to 100 posts.
The world shouldn't be deprived of my valuable insight.
No, thank you. The resultant increase in heat, devoid of light, would further
aggravate
On Oct 7, 2008, at 3:53 PM, mainstream20016 wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From now until election day, up the weekly maximum to 100 posts.
The world shouldn't be deprived of my valuable insight.
No, thank you. The resultant increase in
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
shempmcgurk wrote:
From now until election day, up the weekly maximum to 100 posts.
The world shouldn't be deprived of my valuable insight.
I was thinking of suggesting the same thing but maybe to 70 posts.
People
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Oct 7, 2008, at 3:53 PM, mainstream20016 wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
shempmcgurk@ wrote:
From now until election day, up the weekly maximum to 100 posts.
The world
---http://video.newsweek.com/#?t=1832200692l=1753282621
In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine salsunshine@
wrote:
On Oct 7, 2008, at 3:53 PM, mainstream20016 wrote:
--- In
From now until election day, up the weekly maximum to 100 posts.
I was thinking of suggesting the same thing but maybe to 70 posts.
People really want to discuss this stuff.
The very reason we should keep the limit to 50.
If people learn to think before posting, the
result will be more
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
From now until election day, up the weekly maximum to 100 posts.
The world shouldn't be deprived of my valuable insight.
I vote curtail Shemp to 25 a week.
Ignorance should be
: off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: PROPOSAL
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, October 7, 2008, 9:47 PM
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From now until election day, up the weekly maximum to 100 posts
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, gullible fool [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
�
I vote everyone limits their typing to one minute. I know it sounds
incredibly stupid, but I
got the idea from Brokaw.
It's the sound-bites, baby.
Lawson
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From now until election day, up the weekly maximum to 100 posts.
The world shouldn't be deprived of my valuable insight.
I vote that 50 remain the limit but that Shemp be given
clemency and not be suspended next
33 matches
Mail list logo
