[FairfieldLife] Re: Queen Elizabeth II to Set a Record?

Re "But the queen will not "retire." Queen of England is not a position that you can retire from. ": What about Edward VIII's abdication (1936) - after his involvement with that woman Wallis Simpson? "Not a position that you can retire from" is what they said about popes, until Benedict

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Queen Elizabeth II to Set a Record?

9, 2015 7:01 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Queen Elizabeth II to Set a Record?   Re "But the queen will not "retire." Queen of England is not a position that you can retire from. ": What about Edward VIII's abdication (1936) - after his involvement with that w

[FairfieldLife] Re: Queen Elizabeth II to Set a Record?

If you read my post, you will see that I mention, in the very next sentence after the one you quote. the example of Edward VIII. Did you fall asleep, s3raphita? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Re "But the queen will not "retire." Queen of England is not a

[FairfieldLife] Re: Queen Elizabeth II to Set a Record?

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Re "But the queen will not "retire." Queen of England is not a position that you can retire from. ": What about Edward VIII's abdication (1936) - after his involvement with that woman Wallis Simpson? Different. He didn't

[FairfieldLife] Re: Queen Elizabeth II to Set a Record?

Did you fall asleep, s3raphita? I plead guilty! I blanked that sentence out. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : If you read my post, you will see that I mention, in the very next sentence after the one you quote. the example of Edward VIII. Did you

[FairfieldLife] Re: Queen Elizabeth II to Set a Record?

I think it's long been an open secret that Prince William rather than Prince Charles will succeed to the throne. I don't think Charles wants to be king, and it would be much more exciting for everyone involved to have a younger man. Charles is already 67 or 68, I believe. But the queen will not