www.kundalinisupport.com if there is further interest, you may want to join the yahoo group, it is active, not for lurkers, participation is required
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "nayakanayaka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Ron! > > As a rare visitor to this group (though very interested, since I spent > 5 yrs in Fairfield), I may have missed something, but would you care > to reveal who your Guru /what your Guru´s background is? > > Thanks! > Manohar > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ron" <sidha7001@> wrote: > > > > Cognitions and revelations are what my guru had prior to > enlightenment and also this > > what s gave my Guru the understanding that enlightenment was there. > As I said, there > > was a time where my guru could know anything about something and > other such things > > > > The point is- who is there to cognize something? > > > > My recolletions are Bevan worships MMY as persona, therefore it is > the greatest Guru in > > 10,000 years, and for example, on some walk MMY was having, all of > the vedas or some > > certain apsects of the vedas were cognized. This has to do with > knowing something, > > where as in Realization, the small self, the me, the identification > of body and mind is > > imploded, merged, it IS only ONE, not one with something > > > > My Guru, speaking from this knowing, informed me a few days ago that > no, ccognitions > > are not there for the enlightened, it also was from experiecne that > with the cogitions and > > revelations, my Guru thought she had arrived, but as long as there > is a me cognizing, > > there is further to go > > > > This is the significance of the Guru being there with the disciple, > otherwise , the disciple > > will go no further and this ends up being a sad thing. > > > > It is most likely the new age thing which people can relate to- it > is there in sai Ma's web > > sight- become a God, develope your full potential, choose > enlightenment, etc. People can > > relate to becoming a better me, gaining a cosmic ego > > > > People can not relate to no me, no ego, no self, only IS- then life > flows > > > > Regarding the Kundalini comment from another post- Maybe it again is > this paradoxal > > thing. My guru explains that where shakti meets shiva, the kundalini > journey is over. IN > > enlightenment, yes, my Guru gives shatipat and shakti is kundalini. > The thing is the > > persona is no longer there so the enlightened experienceing Kundalini? > > > > All 3 enlightened in my path went through the kundalini journey- 2 > of the 3 are gurus- > > the other a sage- and it is an inspirational story for that one > being on the path for only > > one year, with 3 babies ( all under 4) and a housewife. > > > > The 2 gurus had very heavy kundlaini journeys, and having arrived in > realization, are > > extremely qualified to speak about Kundalini. Both independantly > commented on MMY > > comments about Kundalini and said it is one that knows nothing of > the kundalini journey. > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <jflanegi@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ron" <sidha7001@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Response: > > > > > > > > I will ask my Guru to comment, as I have been saying, I am not > > > enlightened. <snip> > > > > > > > Comment: If you or anyone else can explain to me how the Vedas > can be > > > > cognized *before* enlightenment, I owe you a nickel. Such a foolish > > > > statement, which you have apparently swallowed hook, line and > > > > sinker.:-) > > > > > > > I am not calling into question anything else regarding siddhis or > > > other powers prior to enlightenment. All that is said about that, I > > > agree with. Just the remark about the Vedas being able to be > cognized, > > > prior to permanent establishment in the Absolute.:-) > > > > > >
