Summa Wrestling and one more swipe at William of Occam: at_man_and_brahman
poses a question or two for Masked Zebra:
Robin, no one has taken up my suggestion to consider how William of Occam would
treat your story. As you probably know, Occam's Razor says, Pluralitas non est
ponenda sine
Briefly, I'm delighted you've returned. I was feeling guilty, thinking I'd
scared you off. I was writing the post below as you were responding to Curtis,
and yes, there's overlap. Also, for the record, I have Protestant DNA, but I'm
not a practicing Methodist. My family is interesting:
Robin, no one has taken up my suggestion to consider how William of Occam would
treat your story. As you probably know, Occam's Razor says, Pluralitas non est
ponenda sine necessitate; Plurality should not be posited without necessity.
The simplest solution is the one most likely to be correct.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, at_man_and_brahman
at_man_and_brahman@... wrote:
...I look at the early history of Peter's church as one
focused on accumulation of gold, jewels, and relics
largely to the exclusion of simple original teachings,
such as not storing up treasures where
-- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, at_man_and_brahman
at_man_and_brahman@... wrote:
...
If the Vedic gods can bring me a bit of life after the evening
news, they can otherwise kiss *my* butt. Sometimes, they succeed,
sometimes not. A meditating friend of mine once told his children
that, if
Nice post. I have no specific comments about it, but
wanted to reply so I'd have the opportunity to thank
you for the Golda Meir quote. That's approaching Oscar
Wilde territory.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, at_man_and_brahman
at_man_and_brahman@... wrote:
Robin, no one has taken up
