LEnglish5 has put his finger on something around the science replication of
what were preliminary and evidently good results. His point is looking at how
to replicate given the practical and real constraints of such large replication
research. This is extremely important as to the fate and
Always about the money! You don't need big social experiments to prove the
Marshy Effect, sure it would be nice but anything that shows that action at a
distance is possible will wake enough people up to get them interested. Besides
the first experiments didn't convince anyone so why would they
Dear Sal,I just stopped my Yogic 'bouncing' long enough to get up and shut off
the Maharishi Channel playing on flat-screens in every room.
What are you saying about John NOT BEING PRESIDENT?
You must be living in Some Surreal World!
...and anyone who doesn't accept 'action-at-a-distance' is no Scientist. A
Superstitious Materialist, maybe.
Replication, as 'proper' Science process:
LEnglish5 is entirely correct.
“The point is to get 8000+ to gather in one place *every single day*.
That isn't easy to do.”
Anti-science skeptics could say, “..one could just as easily say that Science
is another way we have of kidding ourselves!”
